MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4310127269 · doi:10.1182/blood-2022-169675

Unravelling the Effect of Blood Type on FVIII:C Levels and Response to DDAVP in 20 Males with a Single Genotype (<i>Twillingate</i> Variant) Causing Mild Hemophilia Α

2022· article· en· W4310127269 on OpenAlexaffabout
Caroline Malcolmson, Michael Shu, Vanessa Bouskill, Ann Marie Stain, Cindy Wakefield, Victor S. Blanchette, Manuel Carção

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemophilia Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGenotypeMedicineInternal medicineImmunologyBiologyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Hemophilia A (HA) occurs secondary to >1000 variants in the F8 gene resulting in decreased/absent production of factor (F) VIII. FVIII:C (coagulant) levels in persons with mild/moderate HA are most impacted by their genotype. ABO blood type (BT) may also impact endogenous FVIII:C levels, but this impact is difficult to assess in a genetically heterogenous group of HA subjects. Canada has a population of mild-moderate HA secondary to a unique large single genotype: c.6104T>C, p.Val2035Ala. This variant arose from a founder effect that occurred about 200 years ago in Twillingate, Newfoundland. We hypothesized that subjects with the Twillingate genotype (despite having the same genotype and thus producing similar amounts of FVIII) would show different endogenous FVIII:C levels related to their BT, as BT impacts FVIII (and VWF) clearance. Our study objectives were to understand the impact of BT on endogenous FVIII:C levels whilst controlling for genotype, and to explore the impact of BT on DDAVP responsiveness. Methods: This was a retrospective, single-center cohort study. Males with a confirmed Twillingate genotype treated at our center between 1980-01-01 to 2022-03-01 were eligible. For each subject, ABO BT, VWF antigen (Ag) and activity, and FVIII:C levels were determined by chart review. We recorded the lowest FVIII:C baseline level; for subjects who had >1 FVIII:C level (done in a non-bleeding state) we also determined their mean baseline FVIII:C level. For DDAVP challenges, the age at the challenge, dose, and route of administration were recorded, as well as pre and 1-hr post FVIII:C levels. Based on 1-hr post-DDAVP FVIII:C levels (IU/mL), subjects were classified on their DDAVP response as responders (≥0.50), partial responders (0.30 to 0.49), or non-responders (<0.30). Median, IQR, mean, and SD were calculated for baseline FVIII:C and VWF:Ag levels, stratified by age (<12; ≥12 y) and by BT (O; non-O). T-tests and Mann-Whitney U (MWU) tests were used to compare normally and non-normally distributed data, respectively. The Fisher-Freeman-Halton Exact Test was used to compare responses to DDAVP between O and non-O subjects. Statistical significance was considered as p≤0.05. All analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics Version 28. Results: 20 males were included: 9 were O BT and 11 were non-O BT (10 were A, 1 was B). There were statistically significant differences between the 2 ABO groups in their median lowest FVIII:C levels: 0.05 IU/mL (O BT) vs. 0.08 IU/mL (non-O BT); p=0.05 (MWU) and in mean FVIII:C levels: medians: 0.08 IU/mL (O BT) vs. 0.12 IU/mL (non-O BT); p=0.02 (t-test). Too few subjects had FVIII:C levels reported at ≥12 y of age to perform statistical analyses. Fifteen subjects (8 O BT: 7 non-O BT) underwent a DDAVP challenge; 13 performed at our center and 2 elsewhere. Median 1-hr post-DDAVP FVIII:C levels were 0.32 IU/mL (O BT) and 0.43 IU/mL (non-O BT); p=0.04 (t-test). The absolute FVIII:C increase with DDAVP was not statistically different between the 2 groups: median increase of 0.22 IU/mL (O BT) vs. 0.28 IU/mL (non-O BT); p=0.10 (t-test) nor was the FVIII:C fold increase: median increase 3.3-fold (O BT) vs. 3.3-fold (non-O BT); p=0.51 (t-test). Among O BT subjects, none were responders, 5 were partial responders and 3 were non-responders. In the non-O BT subjects, 2 were responders and 5 were partial responders. The variation in response between the 2 groups failed to achieve statistical significance (p=0.14). Given uncertainties in DDAVP challenges (e.g. dose, route of administration) done elsewhere, we also analyzed the DDAVP challenge results just for the 13 subjects from our center. The median 1-hr post-DDAVP FVIII:C levels were 0.30 IU/mL in 7 O BT subjects and 0.45 IU/mL in 6 non-O BT subjects; p=0.02 (t-test). Conclusions: This study shows that in HA subjects with an identical genotype, BT significantly impacts FVIII:C levels. Although only 1 unique genotype was studied, we believe that other hemophilic variants leading to mild HA will behave similarly. This may explain why in subjects with mild HA, there is an overrepresentation of O BT. Persons with non-O BT and HA variants that only slightly reduce FVIII production may have FVIII:C levels that are not as reduced and thus may never present with bleeding and be diagnosed with HA. In contrast, if such persons have O BT, they are likely to show much lower FVIII:C levels and thus more likely to bleed and be diagnosed with HA. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicHemophilia Treatment and Research→French-language works237,207→