MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4311165255 · doi:10.1182/blood-2022-171751

Consolidation Therapy with Blinatumomab Improves Overall Survival in Newly Diagnosed Adult Patients with B-Lineage Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Measurable Residual Disease Negative Remission: Results from the ECOG-ACRIN E1910 Randomized Phase III National Cooperative Clinical Trials Network Trial

2022· article· en· W4311165255 sur OpenAlexaff
Mark R. Litzow, Zhuoxin Sun, Elisabeth Paietta, Ryan J. Mattison, Hillard M. Lazarus, Jacob M. Rowe, Daniel A. Arber, Charles G. Mullighan, Cheryl L. Willman, Yanming Zhang, Matthew J. Wieduwilt, Michaela Liedtke, Julie Bergeron, Keith W. Pratz, Shira Dinner, Noelle V. Frey, Steven D. Gore, Bhavana Bhatnagar, Ehab Atallah, Geoffrey L. Uy, Deepa Jeyakumar, Tara L. Lin, Richard F. Little, Selina M. Luger, Martin S. Tallman

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
Établissements canadiensHôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineBlinatumomabMinimal residual diseaseInternal medicineInduction chemotherapyChemotherapy regimenChemotherapyRituximabOncologyGastroenterologySurgeryLeukemiaLymphoblastic LeukemiaLymphoma

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction: Adults with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) can achieve a high rate of complete remission (CR) with conventional chemotherapy (CC), but frequently relapse and have suboptimal survival rates even if their measurable residual disease (MRD) status is negative after induction. Blinatumomab (blin) is a bispecific T cell engager molecule that is FDA-approved for patients with relapsed/refractory B-lineage ALL or patients in morphologic CR who are MRD positive (>0.1%). We conducted a phase III trial randomizing patients to CC with or without blin to determine if patients who become MRD negative (<0.01%) after induction chemotherapy (chemo) can have improved outcomes with the addition of blin. Methods: Patients (pts) between the ages of 30 and 70 with newly diagnosed BCR::ABL1 negative B-lineage ALL were enrolled and initially received 2.5 months of combination induction chemo utilizing a BFM-like regimen adapted from the E2993/UKALLXII clinical trial with extended remission induction, addition of pegaspargase for patients <55 years of age and addition of rituximab for CD20 positive patients (figure 1). After remission induction (step 1), if pts were in morphologic complete remission (CR/CRi), they continued on-study and received an intensification course of high dose methotrexate with pegaspargase for CNS prophylaxis (step 2). Subsequently, their remission and MRD status were determined centrally by 6-color flow cytometry with MRD negativity defined as <0.01%. All patients were then randomized to receive an additional four cycles of consolidation chemo or two cycles of blin for 28 days each cycle followed by 3 cycles of consolidation chemo, another 4-week cycle of blinatumomab (3rd cycle of blinatumomab) followed by an additional cycle of chemo and then a 4th cycle of blinatumomab (step 3). Patients in each arm received the same number of cycles and doses of chemo. Following completion of consolidation chemo +/- blin, pts were given 2.5 years of POMP maintenance therapy timed from the start of the intensification cycle (step 4). Patients proceeded to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) at the discretion of the treating physician which was suggested to be done after the first two cycles of blin in the blin arm or at any time following intensification chemo in the control chemo arm. Following the FDA approval of blin for MRD positive disease in March, 2018 pts who were MRD positive after intensification were assigned to the blin arm of the trial and no longer randomized. The primary objective of the trial was to compare the overall survival (OS) in MRD- patients who received blin in conjunction with chemo to that of patients who received chemo alone. With a minimum of 190 MRD negative pts, the study had an 80% power to detect a 45% reduction in hazard rate in the blinatumomab arm relative to the control chemo arm, using one-sided log rank test at the significance level of 0.025 and assuming 2 years of follow-up. Estimates of OS were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Comparison of OS between treatment arms were conducted using the stratified log-rank test and Cox proportional-hazards model with age, CD20 status, rituximab use, and whether pts intend to receive HSCT or not as stratification factors. Results: The study activated on December 17, 2013. 772 pts were screened for the trial and 488 were enrolled on step 1 induction therapy. The study closed to enrollment on October 15, 2019. The median age of the pts was 51 years (range 30-70). 224 MRD negative pts were randomized, 112 pts to each arm. 22 pts in each arm proceeded to allogeneic BMT. The CR/CRi rate after induction chemo was 81%. Among the MRD negative pts, at the third interim efficacy analysis, 56 pts had died, 17 in the blin arm and 39 in the control chemo arm. The upper boundary for efficacy analysis was crossed in favor of blin with a significant improvement in overall survival in favor of the blin arm as shown in figure 2 (median OS: not reached vs. 71.4 months; Hazard ratio 0.42, 95% CI: 0.24 - 0.75; two-sided p=0.003). Median follow-up was 43 months. Conclusion: The addition of blin to consolidation chemo resulted in a significantly better overall survival in pts with newly diagnosed B-lineage ALL who were MRD negative after intensification chemo. No significant safety concerns were noted. The addition of blin to consolidation chem in adult pts aged 30-70 years represents a new standard of care for BCR::ABL1 negative ALL pts. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,011
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,032
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMétarecherche, Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai randomisé · Signal consensuel: Essai randomisé
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,031
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0110,032
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,043
Tête enseignante GPT0,346
Écart entre enseignants0,303 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeEssai randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations75
Publié2022
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia researchTravaux en français237 207