Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In May 1930 the Surrealist writer Philippe Soupault suggested to Samuel Beckett that he team up with the poet Alfred Péron to translate into French a chapter from what was to become James Joyce’s final novel, Finnegans Wake (published in 1939). The collaboration with Péron can be seen as a starting point for Beckett’s development as a translator – a development that is interlaced with that of him as a writer. In a special Surrealist issue of This Quarter published in 1932, over a quarter of the volume’s two hundred texts were ‘rendered into English by Samuel Beckett’. 1 Commissioned by Nancy Cunard, whose Hours Press had awarded Beckett’s poem ‘Whoroscope’ with a prize in 1930, he translated nineteen texts (prose, poetry, essays) for Negro: An Anthology (1934). This groundbreaking collection was conceived by Cunard as ‘no less than a comprehensive history of the cultural, social, political, and artistic achievements of the black people in the world’. 2 Throughout the 1930s Beckett would also translate a great number of Surrealist texts into English for various issues of transition magazine. Clearly, Beckett was a productive translator in this formative decade, and although he himself may have regarded his translations as mere bread-and-butter exercises, their creative originality and the obvious effort he put into them suggest that they are centrally important to his oeuvre. I would argue, in fact, that they are to be considered as source texts in their own right. As Sinéad Mooney suggests, Beckett was interested in ‘broadening [through translation] the expansive possibilities of English’, an ambition he shared with many of his contemporaries. 3 His translations are essential in understanding how his poetics evolved, and helped shape his approach to the self-translations by which he would go on to create, particularly after the Second World War, the famous redoubling of his oeuvre: Beckett’s self-translations are generally considered to be both dependent on and autonomous from their source texts. Similarly, adapting to his own goals the cultural context around him, Beckett in the 1930s produced translations that deserve to be seen in a fresh light: as experiments in transposing – both recreating source texts and creating independent target texts – rather than in merely translating texts.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,011 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,011 | 0,014 |
| Communication savante | 0,011 | 0,008 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,007 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,004 | 0,009 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,045 | 0,012 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».