MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4313550086 · doi:10.1162/pajj_a_00648

Virus as Metaphor in the Age of Catastrophe

2023· article· en· W4313550086 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jacki Apple

Notice bibliographique

RevuePAJ A Journal of Performance and Art · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueLeadership, Courage, and Heroism Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésTheme (computing)ArtMetaphorPerforming artsBoredomLiteratureHistoryVictoryPerformance artVisual artsAestheticsArt historyPsychologyPoliticsPhilosophyLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

it’s alive, IT’S ALIVE!, a theatrical cabaret written and performed by John Fleck, directed by David Schweizer, Odyssey Theatre, Los Angeles, CA, February 19-March 20, 2022.I am writing this on March 8, 2022, in the midst of a war and a planet is in crisis. You will probably read this months from now in a very different reality. I haven’t written a performance review since the very beginning of 2020. During the Covid years, going to live performance was out of the question. Watching the earnest attempts of dancers and theatre performers in the flat, limited, and distanced space of the computer screen became increasingly frustrating to the point of boredom and despair. So I stopped watching. And with my own sense of deprivation came the realization that live performance matters more than ever.This became the core theme of John Fleck’s latest work it’s alive, IT’S ALIVE!, directed by longtime collaborator David Schweizer, in which Fleck constructs a dialectic between the live virus that has taken over our lives and his own performance before a live (but well-masked) audience. It is an act of defiance, but also one of salvation that reiterates why art and theatre matter. Fleck is a master at shifting between personae, and he seamlessly slips in and out of three main characters: the Covid virus and its various mutant offspring, often speaking in a high-pitched falsetto; the uninformed, science-rejecting, angry model of toxic masculinity; and himself, the artist/performer speaking directly to his audience about life, death, art, and the absurdities of our condition. Through these different voices, he expresses our collective fears, assumptions, and prejudices, while questioning our roles and responsibilities as humans living on this planet at this precarious moment. The various anecdotal narratives, rants, raves, and personal revelations were intercut with Broadway musical numbers (with a twist), and a smattering of the latest media headlines mixed with media misinformation, accompanied by two singer/dancers, Kyle G. Fuller and Tomoko Karina, and two musicians, John Snow and Scott Roberts, on bass and keyboards, respectively. Fleck combined campy humor with darker satirical observations, ending with a somber but ironically hopeful conclusion.Fleck enters hobbling on one crutch, singing, “when Johnny comes marching home again … hurrah, hurrah.” The crutch functions as a metaphor: it later turns into a rifle when he wears a fur headdress with horns wielding his weapon at the “enemy.” The phrase that popped into my mind was that we are a wounded species, both hunted and hunter. As Covid, the alien invader, Fleck dons a clear globe-shaped space helmet adorned with spiky red viruses and explains that he is just a “living organism looking for a place to call home” and that he considers Earth to be “that junkyard in the sky.” Or perhaps, I think, we are the virus, both predator and parasite, destroying our home planet.While his backup singers act as janitors sanitizing the stage, Fleck addresses the audience with his characteristic banter, often mirroring our own discomforts and social uncertainties when he comments on how creepy it is to look out at a masked audience and not know if they are smiling or scowling. Such is our condition of isolation and subsequent alienation when we can no longer read each other’s faces, be they masked or watching themselves “perform” on the screen. Fleck leads us into doubt and uncertainty when he poses a series of “what if” questions, each one more absurd: What if the 2020 election was rigged?What if Donald Trump is Jesus?What if the Chinese virus put memory chips on your organs?He sings, “life could be a dream, if I could blow you to smithereens,” and insinuates that “we are embedded inside of you.” The Covid helmet repeatedly goes on and comes off as he sings “Amazing Grace,” mocks religion, rejects a mask, supports the truckers in Canada declaring the “government’s not gonna take away our rights,” and quotes Tucker Carlson in saying that the “pandemic is a homo agenda.”But then there is another point of view, that of the virus as a sentient being that perceives us as pitiful creatures in a troubled dark world. “Why would we want to kill you,” it asks, “when you are our host and our home … We are sensitive sentient beings that mutate and evolve, softer than the dominant variant.” Then, in an ironic aside, Fleck adds, “I feel like Liz Cheney, I don’t recognize my party.” In between are nostalgic cabaret song and dance numbers to make us laugh and cheer us up, and maybe to recall another time.Fleck sums it all up as “himself,” as someone lately preoccupied with death. He has just turned seventy. He has been doing this—live theatre—for four decades, breaking precedents, deconstructing media, connecting with his audiences on a visceral level, reminding us over and over how profound that collective connection can be. He is feeling the full weight of the uncertainty of our times. The Arctic is melting, the midterm elections are near, and democracy hangs on a thread. Life goes away too soon. But through all the madness and challenges of the past two years, Fleck believes in art and the power of theatre not simply as entertainment or distraction, but as a transformative act. And so we go on hoping to make a difference.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,395
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,189

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,054
Tête enseignante GPT0,322
Écart entre enseignants0,269 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePAJ A Journal of Performance and ArtMême sujetLeadership, Courage, and Heroism StudiesTravaux en français237 207