MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313550086 · doi:10.1162/pajj_a_00648

Virus as Metaphor in the Age of Catastrophe

2023· article· en· W4313550086 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jacki Apple

Bibliographic record

VenuePAJ A Journal of Performance and Art · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicLeadership, Courage, and Heroism Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTheme (computing)ArtMetaphorPerforming artsBoredomLiteratureHistoryVictoryPerformance artVisual artsAestheticsArt historyPsychologyPoliticsPhilosophyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

it’s alive, IT’S ALIVE!, a theatrical cabaret written and performed by John Fleck, directed by David Schweizer, Odyssey Theatre, Los Angeles, CA, February 19-March 20, 2022.I am writing this on March 8, 2022, in the midst of a war and a planet is in crisis. You will probably read this months from now in a very different reality. I haven’t written a performance review since the very beginning of 2020. During the Covid years, going to live performance was out of the question. Watching the earnest attempts of dancers and theatre performers in the flat, limited, and distanced space of the computer screen became increasingly frustrating to the point of boredom and despair. So I stopped watching. And with my own sense of deprivation came the realization that live performance matters more than ever.This became the core theme of John Fleck’s latest work it’s alive, IT’S ALIVE!, directed by longtime collaborator David Schweizer, in which Fleck constructs a dialectic between the live virus that has taken over our lives and his own performance before a live (but well-masked) audience. It is an act of defiance, but also one of salvation that reiterates why art and theatre matter. Fleck is a master at shifting between personae, and he seamlessly slips in and out of three main characters: the Covid virus and its various mutant offspring, often speaking in a high-pitched falsetto; the uninformed, science-rejecting, angry model of toxic masculinity; and himself, the artist/performer speaking directly to his audience about life, death, art, and the absurdities of our condition. Through these different voices, he expresses our collective fears, assumptions, and prejudices, while questioning our roles and responsibilities as humans living on this planet at this precarious moment. The various anecdotal narratives, rants, raves, and personal revelations were intercut with Broadway musical numbers (with a twist), and a smattering of the latest media headlines mixed with media misinformation, accompanied by two singer/dancers, Kyle G. Fuller and Tomoko Karina, and two musicians, John Snow and Scott Roberts, on bass and keyboards, respectively. Fleck combined campy humor with darker satirical observations, ending with a somber but ironically hopeful conclusion.Fleck enters hobbling on one crutch, singing, “when Johnny comes marching home again … hurrah, hurrah.” The crutch functions as a metaphor: it later turns into a rifle when he wears a fur headdress with horns wielding his weapon at the “enemy.” The phrase that popped into my mind was that we are a wounded species, both hunted and hunter. As Covid, the alien invader, Fleck dons a clear globe-shaped space helmet adorned with spiky red viruses and explains that he is just a “living organism looking for a place to call home” and that he considers Earth to be “that junkyard in the sky.” Or perhaps, I think, we are the virus, both predator and parasite, destroying our home planet.While his backup singers act as janitors sanitizing the stage, Fleck addresses the audience with his characteristic banter, often mirroring our own discomforts and social uncertainties when he comments on how creepy it is to look out at a masked audience and not know if they are smiling or scowling. Such is our condition of isolation and subsequent alienation when we can no longer read each other’s faces, be they masked or watching themselves “perform” on the screen. Fleck leads us into doubt and uncertainty when he poses a series of “what if” questions, each one more absurd: What if the 2020 election was rigged?What if Donald Trump is Jesus?What if the Chinese virus put memory chips on your organs?He sings, “life could be a dream, if I could blow you to smithereens,” and insinuates that “we are embedded inside of you.” The Covid helmet repeatedly goes on and comes off as he sings “Amazing Grace,” mocks religion, rejects a mask, supports the truckers in Canada declaring the “government’s not gonna take away our rights,” and quotes Tucker Carlson in saying that the “pandemic is a homo agenda.”But then there is another point of view, that of the virus as a sentient being that perceives us as pitiful creatures in a troubled dark world. “Why would we want to kill you,” it asks, “when you are our host and our home … We are sensitive sentient beings that mutate and evolve, softer than the dominant variant.” Then, in an ironic aside, Fleck adds, “I feel like Liz Cheney, I don’t recognize my party.” In between are nostalgic cabaret song and dance numbers to make us laugh and cheer us up, and maybe to recall another time.Fleck sums it all up as “himself,” as someone lately preoccupied with death. He has just turned seventy. He has been doing this—live theatre—for four decades, breaking precedents, deconstructing media, connecting with his audiences on a visceral level, reminding us over and over how profound that collective connection can be. He is feeling the full weight of the uncertainty of our times. The Arctic is melting, the midterm elections are near, and democracy hangs on a thread. Life goes away too soon. But through all the madness and challenges of the past two years, Fleck believes in art and the power of theatre not simply as entertainment or distraction, but as a transformative act. And so we go on hoping to make a difference.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.395
Threshold uncertainty score0.189

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePAJ A Journal of Performance and ArtSame topicLeadership, Courage, and Heroism StudiesFrench-language works237,207