MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4313830980 · doi:10.1016/j.echo.2022.12.025

Assessment of Early Diastolic Intraventricular Pressure Difference in Children by Blood Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography

2023· article· en· W4313830980 sur OpenAlexafffund
Kristian Sørensen, Solveig Fadnes, Luc Mertens, Matthew Henry, Patrick Segers, Lasse Løvstakken, Siri Ann Nyrnes

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of the American Society of Echocardiography · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Établissements canadiensSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesSt. Olavs Hospital Universitetssykehuset i TrondheimHospital for Sick ChildrenHelse Midt-NorgeNorges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelige Universitet
Mots-clésMedicineCardiologyInternal medicineBlood pressureSpeckle tracking echocardiographyDiastoleHeart failureEjection fraction

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

•BST provides angle-independent blood flow velocities in 2 dimensions.•BST can estimate IVPGs in children.•BST can assess LV early diastolic relaxation and suction.•LV early diastolic relaxation is significantly reduced in children with DCM and HCM. BackgroundThe lack of reliable echocardiographic techniques to assess diastolic function in children is a major clinical limitation. Our aim was to develop and validate the intraventricular pressure difference (IVPD) calculation using blood speckle-tracking (BST) and investigate the method’s potential role in the assessment of diastolic function in children.MethodsBlood speckle-tracking allows two-dimensional angle-independent blood flow velocity estimation. Blood speckle-tracking images of left ventricular (LV) inflow from the apical 4-chamber view in 138 controls, 10 patients with dilated cardiomyopathies (DCMs), and 21 patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathies (HCMs) <18 years of age were analyzed to study LV IVPD during early diastole. Reproducibility of the IVPD analysis was assessed, IVPD estimates from BST and color M mode were compared, and the validity of the BST-based IVPD calculations was tested in a computer flow model.ResultsMean IVPD was significantly higher in controls (−2.28 ± 0.62 mm Hg) compared with in DCM (−1.21 ± 0.39 mm Hg, P < .001) and HCM (−1.57 ± 0.47 mm Hg, P < .001) patients. Feasibility was 88.3% in controls, 80% in DCM patients, and 90.4% in HCM patients. The peak relative negative pressure occurred earlier at the apex than at the base and preceded the peak E-wave LV filling velocity, indicating that it represents diastolic suction. Intraclass correlation coefficients for intra- and interobserver variability were 0.908 and 0.702, respectively. There was a nonsignificant mean difference of 0.15 mm Hg between IVPD from BST and color M mode. Estimation from two-dimensional velocities revealed a difference in peak IVPD of 0.12 mm Hg (6.6%) when simulated in a three-dimensional fluid mechanics model.ConclusionsIntraventricular pressure difference calculation from BST is highly feasible and provides information on diastolic suction and early filling in children with heart disease. Intraventricular pressure difference was significantly reduced in children with DCM and HCM compared with controls, indicating reduced early diastolic suction in these patient groups. The lack of reliable echocardiographic techniques to assess diastolic function in children is a major clinical limitation. Our aim was to develop and validate the intraventricular pressure difference (IVPD) calculation using blood speckle-tracking (BST) and investigate the method’s potential role in the assessment of diastolic function in children. Blood speckle-tracking allows two-dimensional angle-independent blood flow velocity estimation. Blood speckle-tracking images of left ventricular (LV) inflow from the apical 4-chamber view in 138 controls, 10 patients with dilated cardiomyopathies (DCMs), and 21 patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathies (HCMs) <18 years of age were analyzed to study LV IVPD during early diastole. Reproducibility of the IVPD analysis was assessed, IVPD estimates from BST and color M mode were compared, and the validity of the BST-based IVPD calculations was tested in a computer flow model. Mean IVPD was significantly higher in controls (−2.28 ± 0.62 mm Hg) compared with in DCM (−1.21 ± 0.39 mm Hg, P < .001) and HCM (−1.57 ± 0.47 mm Hg, P < .001) patients. Feasibility was 88.3% in controls, 80% in DCM patients, and 90.4% in HCM patients. The peak relative negative pressure occurred earlier at the apex than at the base and preceded the peak E-wave LV filling velocity, indicating that it represents diastolic suction. Intraclass correlation coefficients for intra- and interobserver variability were 0.908 and 0.702, respectively. There was a nonsignificant mean difference of 0.15 mm Hg between IVPD from BST and color M mode. Estimation from two-dimensional velocities revealed a difference in peak IVPD of 0.12 mm Hg (6.6%) when simulated in a three-dimensional fluid mechanics model. Intraventricular pressure difference calculation from BST is highly feasible and provides information on diastolic suction and early filling in children with heart disease. Intraventricular pressure difference was significantly reduced in children with DCM and HCM compared with controls, indicating reduced early diastolic suction in these patient groups.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,016
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,777

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,007
Bibliométrie0,0010,005
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,008
Tête enseignante GPT0,254
Écart entre enseignants0,247 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations19
Publié2023
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of the American Society of EchocardiographyMême sujetCardiovascular Function and Risk FactorsTravaux en français237 207