Assessment of Early Diastolic Intraventricular Pressure Difference in Children by Blood Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The lack of reliable echocardiographic techniques to assess diastolic function in children is a major clinical limitation. Our aim was to develop and validate the intraventricular pressure difference (IVPD) calculation using blood speckle-tracking (BST) and investigate the method's potential role in the assessment of diastolic function in children. METHODS: Blood speckle-tracking allows two-dimensional angle-independent blood flow velocity estimation. Blood speckle-tracking images of left ventricular (LV) inflow from the apical 4-chamber view in 138 controls, 10 patients with dilated cardiomyopathies (DCMs), and 21 patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathies (HCMs) <18 years of age were analyzed to study LV IVPD during early diastole. Reproducibility of the IVPD analysis was assessed, IVPD estimates from BST and color M mode were compared, and the validity of the BST-based IVPD calculations was tested in a computer flow model. RESULTS: Mean IVPD was significantly higher in controls (-2.28 ± 0.62 mm Hg) compared with in DCM (-1.21 ± 0.39 mm Hg, P < .001) and HCM (-1.57 ± 0.47 mm Hg, P < .001) patients. Feasibility was 88.3% in controls, 80% in DCM patients, and 90.4% in HCM patients. The peak relative negative pressure occurred earlier at the apex than at the base and preceded the peak E-wave LV filling velocity, indicating that it represents diastolic suction. Intraclass correlation coefficients for intra- and interobserver variability were 0.908 and 0.702, respectively. There was a nonsignificant mean difference of 0.15 mm Hg between IVPD from BST and color M mode. Estimation from two-dimensional velocities revealed a difference in peak IVPD of 0.12 mm Hg (6.6%) when simulated in a three-dimensional fluid mechanics model. CONCLUSIONS: Intraventricular pressure difference calculation from BST is highly feasible and provides information on diastolic suction and early filling in children with heart disease. Intraventricular pressure difference was significantly reduced in children with DCM and HCM compared with controls, indicating reduced early diastolic suction in these patient groups.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".