MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313830980 · doi:10.1016/j.echo.2022.12.025

Assessment of Early Diastolic Intraventricular Pressure Difference in Children by Blood Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography

2023· article· en· W4313830980 on OpenAlexafffund
Kristian Sørensen, Solveig Fadnes, Luc Mertens, Matthew Henry, Patrick Segers, Lasse Løvstakken, Siri Ann Nyrnes

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society of Echocardiography · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
FundersSt. Olavs Hospital Universitetssykehuset i TrondheimHospital for Sick ChildrenHelse Midt-NorgeNorges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelige Universitet
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyInternal medicineBlood pressureSpeckle tracking echocardiographyDiastoleHeart failureEjection fraction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

•BST provides angle-independent blood flow velocities in 2 dimensions.•BST can estimate IVPGs in children.•BST can assess LV early diastolic relaxation and suction.•LV early diastolic relaxation is significantly reduced in children with DCM and HCM. BackgroundThe lack of reliable echocardiographic techniques to assess diastolic function in children is a major clinical limitation. Our aim was to develop and validate the intraventricular pressure difference (IVPD) calculation using blood speckle-tracking (BST) and investigate the method’s potential role in the assessment of diastolic function in children.MethodsBlood speckle-tracking allows two-dimensional angle-independent blood flow velocity estimation. Blood speckle-tracking images of left ventricular (LV) inflow from the apical 4-chamber view in 138 controls, 10 patients with dilated cardiomyopathies (DCMs), and 21 patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathies (HCMs) <18 years of age were analyzed to study LV IVPD during early diastole. Reproducibility of the IVPD analysis was assessed, IVPD estimates from BST and color M mode were compared, and the validity of the BST-based IVPD calculations was tested in a computer flow model.ResultsMean IVPD was significantly higher in controls (−2.28 ± 0.62 mm Hg) compared with in DCM (−1.21 ± 0.39 mm Hg, P < .001) and HCM (−1.57 ± 0.47 mm Hg, P < .001) patients. Feasibility was 88.3% in controls, 80% in DCM patients, and 90.4% in HCM patients. The peak relative negative pressure occurred earlier at the apex than at the base and preceded the peak E-wave LV filling velocity, indicating that it represents diastolic suction. Intraclass correlation coefficients for intra- and interobserver variability were 0.908 and 0.702, respectively. There was a nonsignificant mean difference of 0.15 mm Hg between IVPD from BST and color M mode. Estimation from two-dimensional velocities revealed a difference in peak IVPD of 0.12 mm Hg (6.6%) when simulated in a three-dimensional fluid mechanics model.ConclusionsIntraventricular pressure difference calculation from BST is highly feasible and provides information on diastolic suction and early filling in children with heart disease. Intraventricular pressure difference was significantly reduced in children with DCM and HCM compared with controls, indicating reduced early diastolic suction in these patient groups. The lack of reliable echocardiographic techniques to assess diastolic function in children is a major clinical limitation. Our aim was to develop and validate the intraventricular pressure difference (IVPD) calculation using blood speckle-tracking (BST) and investigate the method’s potential role in the assessment of diastolic function in children. Blood speckle-tracking allows two-dimensional angle-independent blood flow velocity estimation. Blood speckle-tracking images of left ventricular (LV) inflow from the apical 4-chamber view in 138 controls, 10 patients with dilated cardiomyopathies (DCMs), and 21 patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathies (HCMs) <18 years of age were analyzed to study LV IVPD during early diastole. Reproducibility of the IVPD analysis was assessed, IVPD estimates from BST and color M mode were compared, and the validity of the BST-based IVPD calculations was tested in a computer flow model. Mean IVPD was significantly higher in controls (−2.28 ± 0.62 mm Hg) compared with in DCM (−1.21 ± 0.39 mm Hg, P < .001) and HCM (−1.57 ± 0.47 mm Hg, P < .001) patients. Feasibility was 88.3% in controls, 80% in DCM patients, and 90.4% in HCM patients. The peak relative negative pressure occurred earlier at the apex than at the base and preceded the peak E-wave LV filling velocity, indicating that it represents diastolic suction. Intraclass correlation coefficients for intra- and interobserver variability were 0.908 and 0.702, respectively. There was a nonsignificant mean difference of 0.15 mm Hg between IVPD from BST and color M mode. Estimation from two-dimensional velocities revealed a difference in peak IVPD of 0.12 mm Hg (6.6%) when simulated in a three-dimensional fluid mechanics model. Intraventricular pressure difference calculation from BST is highly feasible and provides information on diastolic suction and early filling in children with heart disease. Intraventricular pressure difference was significantly reduced in children with DCM and HCM compared with controls, indicating reduced early diastolic suction in these patient groups.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.777

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.007
Bibliometrics0.0010.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Society of EchocardiographySame topicCardiovascular Function and Risk FactorsFrench-language works237,207