Employees of the Kyiv Central Historical Archives of Ancient Acts (1921–1941) in the Light of Prosopography
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The aim of the study is to reconstruct a collective portrait of employees of the Kyiv Central Archives of Ancient Acts in 1921–1941 based on historiographical works and documents of the Central State Archives of the Supreme Bodies of Power and Government of Ukraine; the methodological basis of the work consists of general scientific (analysis, synthesis, deduction, induction, systematic approach) and special-historical (historical-genetic, historicalcomparative) methods and principles of historicism, subjectivism, optimization of the volume of information. The novelty of the work. In the article, for the first time, we reconstruct the prosopographic portrait of the staff of the archival institution according to educational-scientific, gender, social and ethnic sections in the era of NEP and Stalin’s industrialization. The turning point in the history of the institution of this period was 1934, when, as a result of a total purge of personnel, the entire archive staff changed. Conclusions. It was found out that until 1934 most of the workers were Ukrainians and Russians. However, from the mid-1930s, significant changes in the ethnic composition took place: along with Ukrainians and Russians, Jews began to be a significant segment of the workforce. Their share among the archive employees correlates with the percentage of Jews among the intelligentsia of the Ukrainian SSR in the 1920s and 1930s. It was found that until 1934, the majority of the archive employees had a classical pre-revolutionary education – gymnasium – university, while in the second half of the decade, the majority of positions were held by persons who graduated from Soviet secondary and higher educational institutions. Significant changes also took place in the social structure of the collective of archivists. Until 1934, the lion’s share of workers were people of non-proletarian origin from noble and bourgeois families. After the «cleaning», the majority came from the families of workers, artisans, civil servants, and peasants. It was observed, that over the course of 20 years, a gradual process of feminization of the collective took place, but women worked in less prestigious and lower-paid positions. As a result of purposeful state policy, the social portrait of the archive workers underwent a radical transformation in the direction of proletarianization. References: 1. Korotkyi V. A. & Ulianovskyi V. I. et al (Comps.). (2001). Alma Mater. Universytet sv. Volodymyra naperedodni ta v dobu Ukrainskoi revoliutsii. 1917–1920. Materialy, dokumenty, spohady [Alma Mater. University of St. Volodymyr on the eve and during the Ukrainian Revolution. 1917–1920. Materials, documents, memories]. Vol. 2. Universytet sv. Volodymyra za doby Ukrainskoi Tsentralnoi Rady ta Hetmanatu Pavla Skoropadskoho [University of St. Volodymyr during the days of the Ukrainian Central Council and the Hetmanate of Pavel Skoropadskyi]. Kyiv: Praim. [in Ukrainian].2. Histsova, L. Z. (2002). Kyivskyi Tsentralnyi Arkhiv davnikh aktiv (1917–1941) [Central historical archives in the city of Kyiv. 1852–1943]. Arkhivy Ukrainy, 4–6, 5–45. [in Ukrainian].3. Kasianov, H. (1992). Ukrainska intelihentsiia 1920-kh – 30-kh rr.: sotsialnyi portret ta istorychna dolia [Ukrainian intelligentsia of the 1920s – 30s: social portrait and historical fate]. Kyiv, Edmonton: Kanad. in-t Ukr. Studii Albert. un-tu. [in Ukrainian].4. Muravtseva, L. M., Strashko, V. V. & Sukhykh, L. A. et al (Comps.). (2002). Kyivskyi tsentralnyi arkhiv davnikh aktiv. 1852–1943 [Central historical archives in the city of Kyiv. 1852– 1943]. Vol. 1. 1852–1921. Kyiv. [in Ukrainian].5. Maha, I. (2008). Viktor Romanovskyi – vydatna postat ukrainskoi arkhivistyky [Viktor Romanovskyi is an outstanding figure in Ukrainian archival history]. Arkhivy Ukrainy, 1–2, 125–138. [in Ukrainian].6. Strashko, V. (2013). Arkhivne vidrodzhennia takozh rozstriliuvaly [Archivists were also shot] Pamiatky: arkheohrafichnyi shchorichnyk, 13, 67–74. [in Ukrainian].7. Vermenych, Ya. V., Bondarchuk, P. M., Hrynevych, L. V., Kovalchuk, O. O., Masnenko, V. V. & Chumak, V. M. (Comps.). Smolii V. A. (Ed.). (2003). «Ukrainizatsiia» 1920 –30-kh rr.: peredumovy, zdobutky, uroky [Ukrainization of the 1920s–30s: prerequisites, achievements, lessons]. Kyiv: Institute of History of Ukraine. [in Ukrainian].8. Matiash, I. B., Zvorskyi, S. L., Prykhodko, L. F., Romanovskyi, R. V. & Fedorova L. M. (Comps.). (2007). Ukrainski arkhivisty (XIX–XX st.): Biobibliohrafichnyi dovidnyk [Ukrainian archivists (XIX–XX centuries): Biobibliographic guide]. Kyiv. [in Ukrainian].9. Kolesnyk, V. F., Korotkyi, V. A. & Chyhyryk, I. I. et al (Comps.). Huberskyi L. V. (Ed.) (2014). Universytet sv. Volodymyra: studentske zhyttia 1834–1917 [University of St. Volodymyr,: student life 1834–1917]. Kyiv: VPZ «Kyivskyi universytet». [in Ukrainian].10. Usenko, I. B. (2021). Novytskyi Viktor Izmailovych: sproba naukovoi biohrafii [Viktor Izmaylovych Novytskyi: scientific biography] Pravova derzhava. Shchorichnyk naukovykh prats, 32, 119–131. [in Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.33663/0869-2491-2021-32-119-13111. Verba, I. (1999). Ohloblyn O. P. [Ohloblyn O. P.] Ukrainska biohrafistyka, 2, 112–115. [in Ukrainian].12. Yakobchuk, N. O. (2015). Prosopohrafichnyi portret Ivana Kamanina (1850–1921) [Prosopographic portrait of Ivan Kamanin (1850–1921)]. Arkhivy Ukrainy, 4, 165–174. [in Ukrainian].13. Zvidomlennia za 1922 rik (1925). [Report for 1922]. Praha: Vyd. Ukrainskoi molodi. [in Ukrainian].14. Zvidomlennia za 1923 r. Vseukrainskoi Akademii nauk u Kyievi: z nahodi pityrichchia isnuvannia Akademii 1918–24) (1924). [Report for 1923]. Kyiv: Druk. Vseukr. Akad. Nauk. [in Ukrainian].15. Zvidomlennia za 1924 r. Ukrainskoi Akademii nauk u Kyievi (1925). [Report for 1924]. Kyiv: druk. UAN. [in Ukrainian].16. Zvidomlennia za 1925 r. Ukrainskoi Akademii nauk u Kyievi (1926). [Report for 1925]. Kyiv: druk. UAN. [in Ukrainian].17. Zvidomlennia za 1926 r. Ukrainskoi Akademii nauk u Kyievi (1927). [Report for 1926]. Kyiv: druk. UAN. [in Ukrainian].
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».