Editorial: Frontiers in oral health: Highlights in preventive dentistry 2021/2
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
plaque is a determinant risk factor for the development of oral diseases like caries and periodontal disease. Interventions to reduce dental plaque include chewing sugar-free gum as an adjunct to toothbrushing. The systematic review and meta-analysis conducted by Nasseripour et al. explores the role of sugar-free chewing gum on plaque quantity in the oral cavity, by looking at the difference in the level of plaque quantity in adults and children who chew sugar-free gum (SFG), compared with those who do not chew SFG, who do not chew gum, or who use alternatives such as probiotics or fluoride varnish. The authors conclude that there is some evidence that chewing SFG, in particular xylitol SFG, reduces the quantity of plaque in the oral cavity in comparison to non SFG chewing or no chewing controls while calling for further research on the topic.Another important risk factor for the development of diseases like dental caries and periodontitis, is dry mouth, which is a main symptom of patients with Sjögren's Syndrome (SS). The minireview by Ngo and Thomson provides an update on the impact of this condition on the quality of life of persons with SS. Understanding of this topic from a patient centered point of view, is crucial for the choice and implementation of preventive measures and disease impact interventions that can aid patients with SS and others with dry mouth.The article by Alai-Towfigh et al. shifts into a provider centered perspective, reporting the findings of a survey to assess Canadian dentists' views on the first dental visit for children. A first dental visit by 12 months of age is the official position of many dental organizations, with the aim of identifying children at high-risk to develop Early Childhood Caries, and to establish the appropriate preventive measures. Their finding that the majority of Canadian general dentists do not follow this recommendation is followed by a discussion of the reasons why they don't, and analysis of how provider's characteristics influence their adherence to the recommendation. These results will be the basis for targeted educational campaigns for dentists to increase participation in early visits, as they are instrumental for the prevention of caries in children.Two additional articles in this series address the importance of dental education in the career paths of future dentists. In their review, Jiang et al. report that fresh dental graduates in Japan, Hong Kong and Mainland China are unfamiliar with potential career paths, they discuss possibilities in the many different options that are available to dentists in this region, and stress that besides providing professional training to dental students, it is very important for educators to guide students to explore different career paths. The research report by Amini et al. explores how oral health advocacy education impacts future engagement. Advocacy for oral health is crucial for advancing oral healthrelated policies to decrease the prevalence and burden of oral diseases. However, there is limited exposure to legislative advocacy in predoctoral dental education. Their results point out that dental students with advocacy experience are more likely to report intentions to participate in advocacy as dentists, and they conclude that dental education has a critical role in preparing future dentistadvocates. Effective advocacy to influence government agencies to incorporate prevention into dental benefit funding for all ages is critical worldwide to change the behavior of dentists from a traditional surgical/operative approach to prevention and optimal intervention.The restrictions that the COVID-19 pandemic has placed on the delivery of traditional preventive procedures worldwide, added to all the measures that we have had to establish to prevent the widespread of the virus within the healthcare personnel and in the population, have been an extreme challenge. The last three articles explore how the COVID 19 pandemic has affected the provision of dental care. Jiang et al. describe the changes in oral health policies and guidelines in response to the pandemic in 9 countries. The commentary by Singhal et al. that followed, expands on the policies that took place in additional provinces and territorial jurisdictions in Canada throughout the pandemic.Finally, the research article of Sofi-Mahmudi and Raittio assesses the adherence to transparency practices of shared data from open access COVID 19 related articles published in dental journals indexed in PubMed. The authors conclude that while the majority of the papers had a conflict-ofinterest disclosure, the prevalence of other transparency practices was far from the acceptable level, and a much stronger commitment to open science practices, particularly to preregistration, and data and code sharing, is needed from all stakeholders.In conclusion, this Research Topic collection includes original research and review papers highlighting the many roles of different stakeholders for advancing the science of Prevention of Oral Diseases in different regions of the world. Dentists, oral health care providers at all levels and settings, dental educators, third party payers, researchers and policy makers should find the information useful to establish collaborations that lead to the prevention of disease and maintenance of sustained health of the populations they serve.YC, GC and JCC: conceptualization. YC: writing-original draft preparation. GC and JCC: writing-review and editing. All authors have read, revised, and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,006 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,004 | 0,007 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».