MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4315433353 · doi:10.3389/froh.2022.1105724

Editorial: Frontiers in oral health: Highlights in preventive dentistry 2021/2

2023· editorial· en· W4315433353 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yasmi O. Crystal, Guglielmo Campus, Joana Cunha‐Cruz

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Oral Health · 2023
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldDentistry
TopicOral microbiology and periodontitis research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOral healthDentistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

plaque is a determinant risk factor for the development of oral diseases like caries and periodontal disease. Interventions to reduce dental plaque include chewing sugar-free gum as an adjunct to toothbrushing. The systematic review and meta-analysis conducted by Nasseripour et al. explores the role of sugar-free chewing gum on plaque quantity in the oral cavity, by looking at the difference in the level of plaque quantity in adults and children who chew sugar-free gum (SFG), compared with those who do not chew SFG, who do not chew gum, or who use alternatives such as probiotics or fluoride varnish. The authors conclude that there is some evidence that chewing SFG, in particular xylitol SFG, reduces the quantity of plaque in the oral cavity in comparison to non SFG chewing or no chewing controls while calling for further research on the topic.Another important risk factor for the development of diseases like dental caries and periodontitis, is dry mouth, which is a main symptom of patients with Sjögren's Syndrome (SS). The minireview by Ngo and Thomson provides an update on the impact of this condition on the quality of life of persons with SS. Understanding of this topic from a patient centered point of view, is crucial for the choice and implementation of preventive measures and disease impact interventions that can aid patients with SS and others with dry mouth.The article by Alai-Towfigh et al. shifts into a provider centered perspective, reporting the findings of a survey to assess Canadian dentists' views on the first dental visit for children. A first dental visit by 12 months of age is the official position of many dental organizations, with the aim of identifying children at high-risk to develop Early Childhood Caries, and to establish the appropriate preventive measures. Their finding that the majority of Canadian general dentists do not follow this recommendation is followed by a discussion of the reasons why they don't, and analysis of how provider's characteristics influence their adherence to the recommendation. These results will be the basis for targeted educational campaigns for dentists to increase participation in early visits, as they are instrumental for the prevention of caries in children.Two additional articles in this series address the importance of dental education in the career paths of future dentists. In their review, Jiang et al. report that fresh dental graduates in Japan, Hong Kong and Mainland China are unfamiliar with potential career paths, they discuss possibilities in the many different options that are available to dentists in this region, and stress that besides providing professional training to dental students, it is very important for educators to guide students to explore different career paths. The research report by Amini et al. explores how oral health advocacy education impacts future engagement. Advocacy for oral health is crucial for advancing oral healthrelated policies to decrease the prevalence and burden of oral diseases. However, there is limited exposure to legislative advocacy in predoctoral dental education. Their results point out that dental students with advocacy experience are more likely to report intentions to participate in advocacy as dentists, and they conclude that dental education has a critical role in preparing future dentistadvocates. Effective advocacy to influence government agencies to incorporate prevention into dental benefit funding for all ages is critical worldwide to change the behavior of dentists from a traditional surgical/operative approach to prevention and optimal intervention.The restrictions that the COVID-19 pandemic has placed on the delivery of traditional preventive procedures worldwide, added to all the measures that we have had to establish to prevent the widespread of the virus within the healthcare personnel and in the population, have been an extreme challenge. The last three articles explore how the COVID 19 pandemic has affected the provision of dental care. Jiang et al. describe the changes in oral health policies and guidelines in response to the pandemic in 9 countries. The commentary by Singhal et al. that followed, expands on the policies that took place in additional provinces and territorial jurisdictions in Canada throughout the pandemic.Finally, the research article of Sofi-Mahmudi and Raittio assesses the adherence to transparency practices of shared data from open access COVID 19 related articles published in dental journals indexed in PubMed. The authors conclude that while the majority of the papers had a conflict-ofinterest disclosure, the prevalence of other transparency practices was far from the acceptable level, and a much stronger commitment to open science practices, particularly to preregistration, and data and code sharing, is needed from all stakeholders.In conclusion, this Research Topic collection includes original research and review papers highlighting the many roles of different stakeholders for advancing the science of Prevention of Oral Diseases in different regions of the world. Dentists, oral health care providers at all levels and settings, dental educators, third party payers, researchers and policy makers should find the information useful to establish collaborations that lead to the prevention of disease and maintenance of sustained health of the populations they serve.YC, GC and JCC: conceptualization. YC: writing-original draft preparation. GC and JCC: writing-review and editing. All authors have read, revised, and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.025
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.173

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.025
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.004
Bibliometrics0.0060.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0110.006
Open science0.0050.002
Research integrity0.0190.014
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0520.026

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Oral HealthSame topicOral microbiology and periodontitis researchFrench-language works237,207