MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4316077799 · doi:10.14309/01.ajg.0000902184.86593.fc

S749 Mirikizumab Improves Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire Scores in Moderately-to-Severely Active UC: The LUCENT-1 and LUCENT-2 Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Studies

2022· article· en· W4316077799 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueMicroscopic Colitis
Établissements canadiensWestern University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineAbsenteeismPlaceboRandomizationWork productivityClinical trialPresenteeismInternal medicinePhysical therapySurgeryProductivityPathology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction: This analysis compares mirikizumab (miri) to placebo (PBO) for improvement in the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire Ulcerative Colitis (WPAI:UC) in participants of LUCENT-1 and LUCENT-2, phase 3 clinical trials who had moderately-to-severely active UC and had failed prior conventional or biologic therapies. Methods: 1162 patients (pts) in LUCENT-1 12-week induction study were randomized 3:1 to receive 300mg miri or PBO intravenously once every 4 weeks (Q4W). 544 pts who completed induction and achieved Modified Mayo Score (MMS) Clinical Response with miri were rerandomized 2:1 in LUCENT-2 to a 40W maintenance treatment of miri 200mg or PBO subcutaneously Q4W for a total of 52W treatment. Randomization was stratified by previous biologic therapy failure, baseline (BL) corticosteroid use, and region. Stratification for LUCENT-1 included BL disease activity, and LUCENT-2 included LUCENT-1 clinical remission status. WPAI:UC scores between 0%-100% were calculated from pts-reported measurements, with a higher score indicating greater impairment. Evaluations of the WPAI:UC domain of overall activity impairment included all respondents, while domains of absenteeism, presenteeism, and work productivity loss required employment at the time of the analyses. Changes from W0 BL at W12 (induction) and W40 (maintenance; 52W treatment) were evaluated by analysis of covariance. Stratification factors and BL scores were used as covariates. Results were reported as least squares mean differences (LSM diff) of miri vs PBO. Results: At BL, 60.67% (N=705) of pts reported employment. At W12 of induction, activity impairment, absenteeism, presenteeism, and work productivity loss were significantly reduced from BL in miri treated pts vs PBO (Table). Of the pts who achieved W12 MMS Clinical Response, those who continued receiving miri had sustained improvements in the WPAI:UC change from BL at W40 of maintenance vs those who received PBO, including activity impairment, presenteeism, and work productivity loss. Absenteeism was not significantly different between treatment groups at W40 (52W treatment). Conclusion: Compared to PBO, miri treatment provided statistically significant improvements in work productivity and activity impairment as measured by the WPAI:UC. Improvements were observed during induction and maintenance therapy in pts with moderately-to-severely active UC who had failed prior conventional or biologic therapies. Table 1. - Changes from Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Ulcerative Colitis Scores at Week 12 and Week 40 (52 Weeks of Continuous Treatment) Activity Impairment of All Participants Absenteeism from Work of Employed Participants Presenteeism at Work of Employed Participants Overall Work Impairment of Employed Participants LSM Change from BL (SE) LSM Diff 1 (SE) LSM Change from BL (SE) LSM Diff 1 (SE) LSM Change from BL (SE) LSM Diff 1 (SE) LSM Change from BL (SE) LSM Diff 1 (SE) Induction Period Change from Baseline (Week 12) PBO IV Q4W (N=294) −12.90 (1.41) −3.45 (1.75) −13.94 (1.75) −14.91 (1.99) Miri 300 mg IV Q4W (N=868) −20.90 (0.87) −8.01 (1.57)*** −7.88 (1.03) −4.43 (1.95)* −19.25 (1.03) −5.31 (1.95)** −20.65 (1.16) −5.74 (2.20)** Maintenance Period Change from Induction Baseline of Miri Induction Responders (Week 40; 52 Weeks of Continuous Therapy) PBO SC Q4W (N=179) −22.91 (1.77) −10.78 (1.68) −19.82 (1.98) −22.59 (2.26) Miri 200 mg SC Q4W (N=365) −32.46 (1.35) −9.55 (1.98)*** −12.85 (1.28) −2.07 (1.93) −29.42 (1.51) −9.60 (2.28)*** −31.72 (1.73) −9.13 (2.61)*** Abbreviats: BL=Baseline; IV=intravenous; LSM=least squares mean; LSM Diff=least squares mean difference; Miri=mirikizumab; N=number of participants in the analysis population; PBO=placebo; Q4W=every 4 weeks; SC=subcutaneous; SD=standard deviation; SE=standard error.1The LSM Diff is the least squares mean change from baseline in WPAI:UC scores of participants receiving mirikizumab minus the LSM change from baseline in WPAI:UC scores of participants receiving placebo. *p< 0.05, **p< 0.01, ***p< 0.001.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai randomisé · Signal consensuel: Essai randomisé
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,162
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,695

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,020
Tête enseignante GPT0,321
Écart entre enseignants0,301 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle