MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4316084375 · doi:10.14309/01.ajg.0000857172.24140.48

S133 An Open-Label Study (ECOSPOR IV) to Evaluate the Safety, Efficacy and Durability of SER-109, an Investigational Oral Microbiome Therapeutic, in Adults With Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection (rCDI)

2022· article· en· W4316084375 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sahil Khanna, Paul Feuerstadt, Edward S. Huang, Caterina Oneto, Darrell S. Pardi, Elaine E Wang, Ananya De, Kelly Brady, Aslı Memişoğlu, David A. Lombardi, Brooke Hasson, Barbara McGovern, Lisa Von Moltke

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineInternal medicineAdverse effectClostridium difficileCohortAntibioticsGastroenterologySurgery

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction: Antibiotics are often insufficient to treat patients with rCDI due to persistence of spores and microbiome disruption. Recurrence occurs in 20-36% of patients with 1st recurrence and ≥40% in those with ≥2 recurrences. We reported that SER-109, an investigational, oral microbiome therapeutic comprised of purified Firmicutes spores, was superior to placebo in reducing risk of rCDI at 8 weeks (12% vs 40%, respectively) in patients with ≥2 CDI recurrences (Feuerstadt, P. N Engl J Med 2022). Here, we report the results of ECOSPOR IV, an open-label trial of SER-109. Methods: Subjects with rCDI were enrolled at 72 US/Canadian sites in 2 cohorts: a) rollover subjects with rCDI in ECOSPOR III, diagnosed by toxin EIA) and b) subjects with ≥1 CDI recurrence (diagnosed by PCR or toxin EIA), inclusive of the current episode). After standard-of-care antibiotics, subjects received SER-109 (4 capsules daily x 3 days). Efficacy, including the proportion of subjects with rCDI (toxin+ diarrhea requiring treatment), and safety were evaluated through Week 8; durability of response was assessed through Week 24. Results: Of 351 subjects screened, 263 were enrolled (Cohort 1: N=29; Cohort 2: N=234; 68% female; mean age 64 years). Comorbidities included cardiac disorders (31%), neoplasms (21%), Type 2 diabetes (11%), COPD (10%), chronic kidney disease (9%), and hepatobiliary disorders (9%). Overall, 137 subjects (52.1%) experienced treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) through Week 8. The majority were mild to moderate in intensity and gastrointestinal (Table). There were 6 deaths (2.3%) and 20 subjects (7.6%) with serious TEAEs, none of which were deemed treatment-related. Overall, rCDI occurred in 23 subjects (8.7%) at Week 8 (4/29 in Cohort 1 [13.8%] and 19/234 in Cohort 2 [8.1%]) and rCDI rates remained low through 24 weeks (13.7% [36/263]). CDI recurrence rates at Week 8 in subjects with first recurrence were similarly low (6.5% [5/77]) as those with ≥2 recurrences (9.7% [18/186]; Figure). Conclusion: SER-109, a potential first-in-class investigational microbiome therapeutic, was observed to be safe and well-tolerated in this population of older patients with multiple comorbidities. The rate of rCDI was low and durable, regardless of the number of prior episodes, supporting the potential benefit of microbiome repair following antibiotics for rCDI. Earlier intervention with SER-109 in first recurrence may reduce morbidity associated with rCDI. Table 1. - Summary of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Within 8 Weeks After Treatment, Safety Population Cohort 1 Cohort 2(N=234) n (%) Total(N=263)n (%) Randomized Treatment Arm in ECOSPOR III Total(N=29)n (%) SER-109(N=4)n (%) Placebo(N=25)n (%) Any TEAE 4 (100.0) 15 (60.0) 19 (65.5) 118 (50.4) 137 (52.1) Most Frequently Reported TEAEs by Preferred Term (≥5% in any cohort) Diarrhoea 1 (25.0) 9 (36.0) 10 (34.5) 49 (20.9) 59 (22.4) Flatulence 0 4 (16.0) 4 (13.8) 16 (6.8) 20 (7.6) Nausea 0 3 (12.0) 3 (10.3) 17 (7.3) 20 (7.6) Abdominal pain 1 (25.0) 2 (8.0) 3 (10.3) 15 (6.4) 18 (6.8) Fatigue 0 3 (12.0) 3 (10.3) 9 (3.8) 12 (4.6) Urinary tract infection 0 0 0 12 (5.1) 12 (4.6) Abdominal distension 1 (25.0) 3 (12.0) 4 (13.8) 7 (3.0) 11 (4.2) Related/Possibly Related TEAE 1 (25.0) 4 (16.0) 5 (17.2) 27 (11.5) 32 (12.2) Severe TEAEs 0 1 (4.0) 1 (3.4) 18 (7.7) 19 (7.2) Serious TEAEs 0 0 0 20 (8.5) 20 (7.6) Serious TEAEs Related/Possibly Related to Study Drug 0 0 0 0 0 Treatment-emergent AESIs 0 0 0 10 (4.3) 10 (3.8) TEAEs Leading to Death1 0 0 0 6 (2.6) 6 (2.3) Abbreviations: AESI = adverse event of special interest; TEAE = treatment-emergent adverse event Notes: Data presented are by subject. All TEAEs were collected and summarized from time of enrollment up to Week 8; Note: N is number of subjects in the Safety Population who are in the study at the beginning of the specified time interval. 1 TEAEs leading to death by preferred term included: congestive cardiomyopathy (1 subject), coronavirus infection and intestinal peforation (1 subect), death due to natural causes (1 subject), clostridium difficile infection (1 subject), necrotising fasciitis (1 subject), and pancreatic carcinoma (1 subject). Note: the start date of the fatal SAE of pancreatic carcinoma began prior to Week 8 with fatal outcome occurred after Week 12. No deaths were deemed by the investigator to be related to study drug. Figure 1.: CDI Recurrence Rate at Week 8 in the Overall Population by Number of CDI Recurrences at Study Entry Note: Subjects who are lost to follow-up, terminated the study prematurely, or died without a recorded recurrence before the end of the time interval are assumed to have had a recurrence. Numbers presented within each bar represent the number of subjects with CDI recurrence over the total number of subjects within each grouping.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai non randomisé · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,011
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,022

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,043
Tête enseignante GPT0,349
Écart entre enseignants0,306 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai non randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2022
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe American Journal of GastroenterologyMême sujetClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens researchTravaux en français237 207