MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4316085795 · doi:10.14309/01.ajg.0000860656.63502.70

S1004 Adverse Events and Serological Responses Following SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in Individuals With Inflammatory Bowel Disease

2022· article· en· W4316085795 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Ante Markovinović, Michelle Herauf, Joshua Quan, Lindsay Hracs, Joseph W. Windsor, Nastaran Sharifi, Stephanie Coward, Léa Caplan, Christopher Ma, Remo Panaccione, R Ingram, Jamil N. Kanji, Graham Tipples, Jessalyn K. Holodinsky, Çharles N. Bernstein, Douglas J. Mahoney, Sasha Bernatsky, Eric I. Benchimol, Gilaad G. Kaplan

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueIntramuscular injections and effects
Établissements canadiensUniversity of TorontoMcGill UniversityUniversity of ManitobaUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Calgary
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineAdverse effectChillsVaccinationInflammatory bowel diseaseSerologyCohortInternal medicineImmunologyDiseaseAntibody

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction: The rapid development and distribution of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines has raised concerns surrounding vaccine safety in immunocompromised populations, such as those with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We described adverse events (AEs) following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in those with IBD and to determine any relationship of AEs to post-vaccination antibody titres. Methods: Individuals with IBD from a prospective cohort in Calgary, Canada who received a first, second, third, and/or fourth dose of a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, and/or AstraZeneca) were assessed for serological response and interviewed via telephone for AEs using questions based on the Adverse Events Following Immunization form. Subsequently, we used the Wilcoxon rank-sum test to analyze AEs and geometric mean titers (GMT). Interview and chart review were used to assess a flare of IBD within 30 days of vaccination. Results: Table describes characteristics of individuals with IBD following the first dose (n=331), second dose (n=331), third dose (n=195), and fourth dose (n=100) of a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. AEs were reported in 83.3% of participants after first dose, 79.1% following second dose, 77.4% following third dose, and 67.0% following fourth dose (Table). Injection site reaction (pain, redness, etc.) was the most common AE (50.8% of total AEs), with fatigue and malaise (18.1% of total AEs), headache and migraine (8.6% of total AEs), musculoskeletal discomfort (8.2% of total AEs), and fever and chills (6.5% of total AEs) also commonly reported. Only one participant was diagnosed with a severe AE requiring hospitalization: immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) following their second dose of a Pfizer vaccine. No cases of IBD flare occurred within 30 days of a vaccine. Analysis found elevated GMT levels in those with injection site reactions compared to those without injection site reactions following all four doses, with second dose serological responses being statistically significantly different (8614/mL vs 6841 AU/mL [p< 0.05], respectively) (Figure). Conclusion: AEs following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination are generally mild and become less common with each consecutive dose. Antibody titres may be higher for participants who report injection site reactions compared to those without injections site reactions after second dose. Vaccines did not appear to be associated with a flare of IBD within 30 days of vaccination.Figure 1.: Anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody concentration across four doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine for participants who reported injection site reactions compared to participants who did not. * indicates statistical significant differences. Table 1. - Participant characteristics and adverse events following first, second, third, and fourth dose of a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine Characteristics Dose 1 (/331) Dose 2 (/331) Dose 3 (/195) Dose 4 (/100) Sex, n (%) Male Female 155 (46.8%)176 (53.2%) 155 (46.8%)176 (53.2%) 86 (44.1%)109 (55.9%) 49 (49.0%)51 (51.0%) Mean age (SD) 52.05 (14.52) 52.05 (14.52) 51.81 (15.20) 57.98 (14.01) IBD Type, n (%) Crohn’s Disease Ulcerative Colitis & IBD-U 238 (71.9%)93 (28.1%) 238 (71.9%)93 (28.1%) 150 (76.9%)45 (23.1%) 75 (75.0%)25 (25.0%) Medication, n (%) No immunosuppressives Anti-TNF only† Immunomodulators only Vedolizumab only Ustekinumab only Tofacitinib only Combination therapy‡ Oral Corticosteroids 33 (10.0%)118 (35.7%)7 (2.1%) 37 (11.2%)76 (23.0%)5 (1.5%)49 (14.8%)6 (1.8%) 32 (9.7%)119 (36.0%)7 (2.1%)39 (11.8%)74 (22.4%)5 (1.5%)47 (14.2%)8 (2.4%) 14 (7.2%)74 (38.0%)5 (2.6%)19 (9.7%)42 (21.5%)< 536 (18.5%)< 5 27 (27.0%)20 (20.0%)< 59 (9.0%)16 (16.0%)—18 (18.0%)7 (7.0%) Vaccine Type, n (%) Pfizer Moderna AstraZeneca 271 (81.9%)45 (13.6%)15 (4.5%) 275 (83.1%)49 (14.8%)7 (2.1%) 179 (91.8%)16 (8.2%)— 82 (82.0%)18 (18.0%)— Adverse Events Dose 1 (/331) Dose 2 (/331) Dose 3 (/195) Dose 4 (/100) Injection site, n (%) 250 (75.5%) 231 (70%) 138 (70.8%) 55 (55.0%) Lymph node swelling, n (%) 1 (0.3%) 9 (2.7%) 14 (7.2%) 1 (1.0%) Gastrointestinal, n (%) 17 (5.1%) 16 (4.8%) 6 (3.1%) 2 (2.0%) Fatigue or malaise, n (%) 86 (26.0%) 87 (26.3%) 45 (23.1%) 22 (22.0%) Fever or chills, n (%) 27 (8.2%) 35 (10.6%) 19 (9.7%) 5 (5.0%) Musculoskeletal, n (%) 34 (10.3%) 41 (12.4%) 25 (12.8%) 9 (9.0%) Headache or migraine, n (%) 34 (10.3%) 46 (13.9%) 23 (11.8%) 11 (11.0%) Other, n (%) 16 (4.8%)α 14 (4.2%)β 7 (3.6%)γ 2 (2.0%)δ Any symptoms, n (%) 275 (83.3%) 261 (79.1%) 151 (77.4%) 67 (67.0%) †One of golimumab, adalimumab, or infliximab (originator or biosimilar) ‡Any combination of anti-TNF and one or more of the following therapies: vedolizumab, ustekinumab, tofacitinib, azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine, or methotrexate αParesthesia, chin swelling, dysgeusia, numbness, hot flashes, irritability, ennui, hyperactivity, brain fog, congestion, dry eyes, sleep trouble, testicular swelling, angioedema, sinus swelling, throat swelling βShingles, hot flashes, brain fog, sleep troubles, rapid heartbeat, forced breathing, congestion, angioedema, throat swelling, leg swelling γHot flashes, brain fog, sleep troubles, sore throat, congestion, angioedema, ITP δParesthesia, sleep troubles

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,021
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,274

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,009
Tête enseignante GPT0,272
Écart entre enseignants0,263 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2022
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe American Journal of GastroenterologyMême sujetIntramuscular injections and effectsTravaux en français237 207