S1004 Adverse Events and Serological Responses Following SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in Individuals With Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: The rapid development and distribution of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines has raised concerns surrounding vaccine safety in immunocompromised populations, such as those with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We described adverse events (AEs) following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in those with IBD and to determine any relationship of AEs to post-vaccination antibody titres. Methods: Individuals with IBD from a prospective cohort in Calgary, Canada who received a first, second, third, and/or fourth dose of a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, and/or AstraZeneca) were assessed for serological response and interviewed via telephone for AEs using questions based on the Adverse Events Following Immunization form. Subsequently, we used the Wilcoxon rank-sum test to analyze AEs and geometric mean titers (GMT). Interview and chart review were used to assess a flare of IBD within 30 days of vaccination. Results: Table describes characteristics of individuals with IBD following the first dose (n=331), second dose (n=331), third dose (n=195), and fourth dose (n=100) of a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. AEs were reported in 83.3% of participants after first dose, 79.1% following second dose, 77.4% following third dose, and 67.0% following fourth dose (Table). Injection site reaction (pain, redness, etc.) was the most common AE (50.8% of total AEs), with fatigue and malaise (18.1% of total AEs), headache and migraine (8.6% of total AEs), musculoskeletal discomfort (8.2% of total AEs), and fever and chills (6.5% of total AEs) also commonly reported. Only one participant was diagnosed with a severe AE requiring hospitalization: immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) following their second dose of a Pfizer vaccine. No cases of IBD flare occurred within 30 days of a vaccine. Analysis found elevated GMT levels in those with injection site reactions compared to those without injection site reactions following all four doses, with second dose serological responses being statistically significantly different (8614/mL vs 6841 AU/mL [p< 0.05], respectively) (Figure). Conclusion: AEs following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination are generally mild and become less common with each consecutive dose. Antibody titres may be higher for participants who report injection site reactions compared to those without injections site reactions after second dose. Vaccines did not appear to be associated with a flare of IBD within 30 days of vaccination.Figure 1.: Anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody concentration across four doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine for participants who reported injection site reactions compared to participants who did not. * indicates statistical significant differences. Table 1. - Participant characteristics and adverse events following first, second, third, and fourth dose of a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine Characteristics Dose 1 (/331) Dose 2 (/331) Dose 3 (/195) Dose 4 (/100) Sex, n (%) Male Female 155 (46.8%)176 (53.2%) 155 (46.8%)176 (53.2%) 86 (44.1%)109 (55.9%) 49 (49.0%)51 (51.0%) Mean age (SD) 52.05 (14.52) 52.05 (14.52) 51.81 (15.20) 57.98 (14.01) IBD Type, n (%) Crohn’s Disease Ulcerative Colitis & IBD-U 238 (71.9%)93 (28.1%) 238 (71.9%)93 (28.1%) 150 (76.9%)45 (23.1%) 75 (75.0%)25 (25.0%) Medication, n (%) No immunosuppressives Anti-TNF only† Immunomodulators only Vedolizumab only Ustekinumab only Tofacitinib only Combination therapy‡ Oral Corticosteroids 33 (10.0%)118 (35.7%)7 (2.1%) 37 (11.2%)76 (23.0%)5 (1.5%)49 (14.8%)6 (1.8%) 32 (9.7%)119 (36.0%)7 (2.1%)39 (11.8%)74 (22.4%)5 (1.5%)47 (14.2%)8 (2.4%) 14 (7.2%)74 (38.0%)5 (2.6%)19 (9.7%)42 (21.5%)< 536 (18.5%)< 5 27 (27.0%)20 (20.0%)< 59 (9.0%)16 (16.0%)—18 (18.0%)7 (7.0%) Vaccine Type, n (%) Pfizer Moderna AstraZeneca 271 (81.9%)45 (13.6%)15 (4.5%) 275 (83.1%)49 (14.8%)7 (2.1%) 179 (91.8%)16 (8.2%)— 82 (82.0%)18 (18.0%)— Adverse Events Dose 1 (/331) Dose 2 (/331) Dose 3 (/195) Dose 4 (/100) Injection site, n (%) 250 (75.5%) 231 (70%) 138 (70.8%) 55 (55.0%) Lymph node swelling, n (%) 1 (0.3%) 9 (2.7%) 14 (7.2%) 1 (1.0%) Gastrointestinal, n (%) 17 (5.1%) 16 (4.8%) 6 (3.1%) 2 (2.0%) Fatigue or malaise, n (%) 86 (26.0%) 87 (26.3%) 45 (23.1%) 22 (22.0%) Fever or chills, n (%) 27 (8.2%) 35 (10.6%) 19 (9.7%) 5 (5.0%) Musculoskeletal, n (%) 34 (10.3%) 41 (12.4%) 25 (12.8%) 9 (9.0%) Headache or migraine, n (%) 34 (10.3%) 46 (13.9%) 23 (11.8%) 11 (11.0%) Other, n (%) 16 (4.8%)α 14 (4.2%)β 7 (3.6%)γ 2 (2.0%)δ Any symptoms, n (%) 275 (83.3%) 261 (79.1%) 151 (77.4%) 67 (67.0%) †One of golimumab, adalimumab, or infliximab (originator or biosimilar) ‡Any combination of anti-TNF and one or more of the following therapies: vedolizumab, ustekinumab, tofacitinib, azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine, or methotrexate αParesthesia, chin swelling, dysgeusia, numbness, hot flashes, irritability, ennui, hyperactivity, brain fog, congestion, dry eyes, sleep trouble, testicular swelling, angioedema, sinus swelling, throat swelling βShingles, hot flashes, brain fog, sleep troubles, rapid heartbeat, forced breathing, congestion, angioedema, throat swelling, leg swelling γHot flashes, brain fog, sleep troubles, sore throat, congestion, angioedema, ITP δParesthesia, sleep troubles
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".