MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4316086255 · doi:10.14309/01.ajg.0000859512.98331.3f

S718 One-Year Comparative Effectiveness of Ustekinumab vs Tofacitinib for Ulcerative Colitis After Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Failure

2022· article· en· W4316086255 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rahul S. Dalal, Puza P. Sharma, Kanwal Bains, Jordan C. Pruce, Jessica R. Allegretti

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueInflammatory Bowel Disease
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésTofacitinibMedicineUstekinumabUlcerative colitisInternal medicineGastroenterologyTumor necrosis factor alphaAdalimumabDiseaseRheumatoid arthritis

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction: Tofacitinib (tofa) is an oral small molecule JAK inhibitor for treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). Real-world data comparing effectiveness of ustekinumab (uste) vs tofa are limited. We compared 52 wk outcomes and drug survival of uste vs tofa for UC. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, adults initiated uste or tofa after failure of >1 anti-TNF agent 5/1/18-4/1/21 at a large US academic center. Electronic records were reviewed. The primary outcome was steroid-free clinical remission (SFCR; i.e. simple clinical colitis activity index <2 or provider assessment and no use of oral/IV steroids for >30 days) at 12 and 52 (+/-4) weeks. Other outcomes: drug survival, endoscopic response/remission, biochemical response/remission, improvement in arthralgia, hospitalization, and colectomy within 52 wks. Reasons for discontinuation are reported descriptively. Inverse probability of treatment weighted (IPTW) logistic and Cox regression were used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and hazard ratios (aHRs). Kaplan-Meier drug survival curves were compared using log-rank tests. Results: 97 pts initiated uste and 69 initiated tofa with median follow-up of 62.0 wks (IQR 35.6-97.0 wks) and 88.0 wks (IQR 40.9-153.1 wks), respectively. Baseline characteristics were similar except for immunomodulator use, Mayo endoscopic subscore, and CRP (Table). At 12 wks, 31/96 (32.3%) uste pts and 36/68 (52.9%) tofa pts were in SFCR (p< 0.01). At 52 wks, 44/90 (48.9%) uste pts and 37/66 (56.1%) tofa pts were in SFCR (p=0.38). 38/97 uste pts and 30/69 tofa pts discontinued tofa during follow-up: non-response (includes colectomy; 89.5% uste, 83.3% tofa), dysplasia requiring colectomy (7.9% uste, 6.7% tofa), insurance or adherence (0% uste, 6.6% tofa), and adverse events (2.6% uste, 3.3% tofa). Patients who discontinued for adverse events had nausea with arthralgia (n=1, uste) and elevated liver enzymes (n=1, tofa). Unadjusted outcomes are presented in Figure A. After IPTW, covariate balance was confirmed with < |10%| standardized differences (Figure B). There was no association between tofa vs uste for SFCR 12 wks (aOR 1.94, 95% CI 0.96-3.92) or 52 wks (aOR 1.16, 95% CI 0.58-2.31). Drug survival was similar between groups (aHR 1.26, 95% CI 0.74-2.15) (Figure C). Conclusion: In a real-world, anti-TNF exposed cohort of UC pts, uste and tofa showed similar effectiveness/safety at 52 wks with approximately 50% of pts in SFCR. Due to limited sample size, larger real-world studies are needed to confirm these findings.Figure 1.: A. Unadjusted outcomes. Definitions of other outcomes: endoscopic response (improvement in Mayo endoscopic subscore by >1 point) and remission (Mayo endoscopic subscore=0) within 52 weeks, biochemical response (improvement in elevated C-reactive protein [CRP] or fecal calprotectin [FC] by >25% from baseline) and remission (normalized CRP or FC) within 52 weeks. Denominators for outcomes vary due to differences in available data pre- and post-drug initiation: SFCR 12 wks (n = 96 uste, 68 tofa), SFCR 52 wks (n = 90 uste, 66 tofa), endoscopy (n = 31 uste, 28 tofa), arthralgia (n = 19 uste, 22 tofa), biochemical (n = 35 uste, 28 tofa), hospitalization (n = 66 uste, 45 tofa), colectomy (n = 67 uste, 50 tofa), discontinuation (n = 93 uste, 66 tofa). Hospitalization and colectomy only consider patients who remained on treatment for full duration of 52 weeks unless outcome was met earlier. *P-values comparing uste vs tofa proportions for each outcome were calculated using Fisher’s exact test; only SFCR 12 wks was significant at p<0.05. B. Covariate balance before and after IPTW. These covariates, which were used to calculate propensity scores, were chosen a priori based on clinical significance and data availability. C. Kaplan-Meier analysis stratified by treatment group. Patients were censored at loss to follow-up or when they discontinued treatment for reasons unrelated to efficacy (e.g. adverse event, dysplasia, adherence). Abbreviations: SFCR = steroid-free clinical remission, IPTW = inverse probability of treatment weighting. Table 1. - Baseline Characteristics Baseline Characteristics Ustekinumab (n=97) Tofacitinib (n=69) P-value* Female 49 (51%) 42 (61%) 0.19 Age, y, median (IQR) 35.5 (29.4, 50.4) 41.2 (28.1, 54.0) 0.25 UC duration, y, median (IQR) 9.0 (4.1, 13.5) 9.5 (4.4, 15.5) 0.39 Race Caucasian 85 (88%) 63 (91%) 0.40 Black 4 (4%) 0 (0%) Asian 5 (5%) 4 (6%) Other/Unknown 3 (3%) 2 (3%) Ethnicity Non-Hispanic 89 (92%) 69 (100%) 0.05 Hispanic 4 (4%) 0 (0%) Unknown 4 (4%) 0 (0%) Prior malignancy 5 (5%) 4 (6%) 0.86 Number of prior biologics, median (IQR) 2 (2,3) 2 (2,3) 0.62 Number of prior anti-TNFs, median (IQR) 1 (1,2) 2 (1,2) 0.18 Prior vedolizumab 64 (66%) 51 (74%) 0.27 Prior tofacitinib 25 (26%) 0 (0%) n/a Prior ustekinumab 0 (0%) 8 (12%) n/a Prior 5-ASA 94 (97%) 67 (97%) 0.94 Current 5-ASA 19 (20%) 10 (14%) 0.39 Prior immunomodulator 70 (72%) 54 (78%) 0.37 Current immunomodulator 24 (25%) 6 (9%) 0.008 Current Oral/IV corticosteroids 0.41 Prednisone/Methylprednisolone 51 (53%) 30 (43%) Budesonide 11 (11%) 7 (10%) BMI, kg/m2, median (IQR) 25.1 (21.7, 29.0) 25.79 (21.8, 28.9) 0.97 Arthralgia at time of drug initiation 26 (27%) 26 (38%) 0.14 Last Montreal disease extent >E1 (i.e. >proctitis) 75 (77%) 59 (86%) 0.19 Last Mayo endoscopic subscore (severity) 0.049 0 (None) 10 (10%) 6 (9%) 1 (Mild) 20 (21%) 7 (10%) 2 (Moderate) 32 (33%) 37 (54%) 3 (Severe) 35 (36%) 19 (28%) Smoking 0.31 Never 70 (72%) 56 (81%) Current 2 (2%) 2 (3%) Former 25 (26%) 11 (16%) Current cannabis use 22 (23%) 9 (13%) 0.12 Current opioid use 3 (3%) 6 (9%) 0.12 UC hospitalization within 12 months 21 (22%) 18 (26%) 0.51 Serum albumin, g/dL, median (IQR) 4.1 (3.8, 4.4) 4.1 (3.8, 4.3) 0.47 C-reactive protein, mg/L, median (IQR) 2.8 (1, 7) 5.1 (1.8, 22.8) 0.01 Fecal calprotectin > 120 ug/g 49 (88%) 25 (89%) 0.81 SCCAI, median (IQR) 5 (3, 7) 5 (4, 8) 0.46 Daily bowel movement frequency, median (IQR) 6 (4, 9) 6 (4, 10) 0.57 Abbreviations: IQR = interquartile range, TNF= tumor necrosis factor, ASA = aminosalicylic acid, SCCAI = simple clinical colitis activity index.*Calculated using Pearson’s chi squared and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests Albumin, C-reactive protein, fecal calprotectin, SCCAI, and bowel movements were the most recent values available within 3 month prior to drug initiation. The most recent endoscopic data preceding drug initiation was used. Median time from endoscopic evaluation to drug initiation was 22.4 weeks (IQR 3.9 -44.1 weeks) for ustekinumab and 19.1 weeks (IQR 6.1-46.1 weeks) for tofacitinib.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,005
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,016

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,003
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,009
Tête enseignante GPT0,252
Écart entre enseignants0,242 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2022
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology→Même sujetInflammatory Bowel Disease→Travaux en français237 207→