MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

S718 One-Year Comparative Effectiveness of Ustekinumab vs Tofacitinib for Ulcerative Colitis After Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Failure

2022· article· en· W4316086255 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rahul S. Dalal, Puza P. Sharma, Kanwal Bains, Jordan C. Pruce, Jessica R. Allegretti

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTofacitinibMedicineUstekinumabUlcerative colitisInternal medicineGastroenterologyTumor necrosis factor alphaAdalimumabDiseaseRheumatoid arthritis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Tofacitinib (tofa) is an oral small molecule JAK inhibitor for treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). Real-world data comparing effectiveness of ustekinumab (uste) vs tofa are limited. We compared 52 wk outcomes and drug survival of uste vs tofa for UC. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, adults initiated uste or tofa after failure of >1 anti-TNF agent 5/1/18-4/1/21 at a large US academic center. Electronic records were reviewed. The primary outcome was steroid-free clinical remission (SFCR; i.e. simple clinical colitis activity index <2 or provider assessment and no use of oral/IV steroids for >30 days) at 12 and 52 (+/-4) weeks. Other outcomes: drug survival, endoscopic response/remission, biochemical response/remission, improvement in arthralgia, hospitalization, and colectomy within 52 wks. Reasons for discontinuation are reported descriptively. Inverse probability of treatment weighted (IPTW) logistic and Cox regression were used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and hazard ratios (aHRs). Kaplan-Meier drug survival curves were compared using log-rank tests. Results: 97 pts initiated uste and 69 initiated tofa with median follow-up of 62.0 wks (IQR 35.6-97.0 wks) and 88.0 wks (IQR 40.9-153.1 wks), respectively. Baseline characteristics were similar except for immunomodulator use, Mayo endoscopic subscore, and CRP (Table). At 12 wks, 31/96 (32.3%) uste pts and 36/68 (52.9%) tofa pts were in SFCR (p< 0.01). At 52 wks, 44/90 (48.9%) uste pts and 37/66 (56.1%) tofa pts were in SFCR (p=0.38). 38/97 uste pts and 30/69 tofa pts discontinued tofa during follow-up: non-response (includes colectomy; 89.5% uste, 83.3% tofa), dysplasia requiring colectomy (7.9% uste, 6.7% tofa), insurance or adherence (0% uste, 6.6% tofa), and adverse events (2.6% uste, 3.3% tofa). Patients who discontinued for adverse events had nausea with arthralgia (n=1, uste) and elevated liver enzymes (n=1, tofa). Unadjusted outcomes are presented in Figure A. After IPTW, covariate balance was confirmed with < |10%| standardized differences (Figure B). There was no association between tofa vs uste for SFCR 12 wks (aOR 1.94, 95% CI 0.96-3.92) or 52 wks (aOR 1.16, 95% CI 0.58-2.31). Drug survival was similar between groups (aHR 1.26, 95% CI 0.74-2.15) (Figure C). Conclusion: In a real-world, anti-TNF exposed cohort of UC pts, uste and tofa showed similar effectiveness/safety at 52 wks with approximately 50% of pts in SFCR. Due to limited sample size, larger real-world studies are needed to confirm these findings.Figure 1.: A. Unadjusted outcomes. Definitions of other outcomes: endoscopic response (improvement in Mayo endoscopic subscore by >1 point) and remission (Mayo endoscopic subscore=0) within 52 weeks, biochemical response (improvement in elevated C-reactive protein [CRP] or fecal calprotectin [FC] by >25% from baseline) and remission (normalized CRP or FC) within 52 weeks. Denominators for outcomes vary due to differences in available data pre- and post-drug initiation: SFCR 12 wks (n = 96 uste, 68 tofa), SFCR 52 wks (n = 90 uste, 66 tofa), endoscopy (n = 31 uste, 28 tofa), arthralgia (n = 19 uste, 22 tofa), biochemical (n = 35 uste, 28 tofa), hospitalization (n = 66 uste, 45 tofa), colectomy (n = 67 uste, 50 tofa), discontinuation (n = 93 uste, 66 tofa). Hospitalization and colectomy only consider patients who remained on treatment for full duration of 52 weeks unless outcome was met earlier. *P-values comparing uste vs tofa proportions for each outcome were calculated using Fisher’s exact test; only SFCR 12 wks was significant at p<0.05. B. Covariate balance before and after IPTW. These covariates, which were used to calculate propensity scores, were chosen a priori based on clinical significance and data availability. C. Kaplan-Meier analysis stratified by treatment group. Patients were censored at loss to follow-up or when they discontinued treatment for reasons unrelated to efficacy (e.g. adverse event, dysplasia, adherence). Abbreviations: SFCR = steroid-free clinical remission, IPTW = inverse probability of treatment weighting. Table 1. - Baseline Characteristics Baseline Characteristics Ustekinumab (n=97) Tofacitinib (n=69) P-value* Female 49 (51%) 42 (61%) 0.19 Age, y, median (IQR) 35.5 (29.4, 50.4) 41.2 (28.1, 54.0) 0.25 UC duration, y, median (IQR) 9.0 (4.1, 13.5) 9.5 (4.4, 15.5) 0.39 Race Caucasian 85 (88%) 63 (91%) 0.40 Black 4 (4%) 0 (0%) Asian 5 (5%) 4 (6%) Other/Unknown 3 (3%) 2 (3%) Ethnicity Non-Hispanic 89 (92%) 69 (100%) 0.05 Hispanic 4 (4%) 0 (0%) Unknown 4 (4%) 0 (0%) Prior malignancy 5 (5%) 4 (6%) 0.86 Number of prior biologics, median (IQR) 2 (2,3) 2 (2,3) 0.62 Number of prior anti-TNFs, median (IQR) 1 (1,2) 2 (1,2) 0.18 Prior vedolizumab 64 (66%) 51 (74%) 0.27 Prior tofacitinib 25 (26%) 0 (0%) n/a Prior ustekinumab 0 (0%) 8 (12%) n/a Prior 5-ASA 94 (97%) 67 (97%) 0.94 Current 5-ASA 19 (20%) 10 (14%) 0.39 Prior immunomodulator 70 (72%) 54 (78%) 0.37 Current immunomodulator 24 (25%) 6 (9%) 0.008 Current Oral/IV corticosteroids 0.41 Prednisone/Methylprednisolone 51 (53%) 30 (43%) Budesonide 11 (11%) 7 (10%) BMI, kg/m2, median (IQR) 25.1 (21.7, 29.0) 25.79 (21.8, 28.9) 0.97 Arthralgia at time of drug initiation 26 (27%) 26 (38%) 0.14 Last Montreal disease extent >E1 (i.e. >proctitis) 75 (77%) 59 (86%) 0.19 Last Mayo endoscopic subscore (severity) 0.049 0 (None) 10 (10%) 6 (9%) 1 (Mild) 20 (21%) 7 (10%) 2 (Moderate) 32 (33%) 37 (54%) 3 (Severe) 35 (36%) 19 (28%) Smoking 0.31 Never 70 (72%) 56 (81%) Current 2 (2%) 2 (3%) Former 25 (26%) 11 (16%) Current cannabis use 22 (23%) 9 (13%) 0.12 Current opioid use 3 (3%) 6 (9%) 0.12 UC hospitalization within 12 months 21 (22%) 18 (26%) 0.51 Serum albumin, g/dL, median (IQR) 4.1 (3.8, 4.4) 4.1 (3.8, 4.3) 0.47 C-reactive protein, mg/L, median (IQR) 2.8 (1, 7) 5.1 (1.8, 22.8) 0.01 Fecal calprotectin > 120 ug/g 49 (88%) 25 (89%) 0.81 SCCAI, median (IQR) 5 (3, 7) 5 (4, 8) 0.46 Daily bowel movement frequency, median (IQR) 6 (4, 9) 6 (4, 10) 0.57 Abbreviations: IQR = interquartile range, TNF= tumor necrosis factor, ASA = aminosalicylic acid, SCCAI = simple clinical colitis activity index.*Calculated using Pearson’s chi squared and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests Albumin, C-reactive protein, fecal calprotectin, SCCAI, and bowel movements were the most recent values available within 3 month prior to drug initiation. The most recent endoscopic data preceding drug initiation was used. Median time from endoscopic evaluation to drug initiation was 22.4 weeks (IQR 3.9 -44.1 weeks) for ustekinumab and 19.1 weeks (IQR 6.1-46.1 weeks) for tofacitinib.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→