MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4317613998 · doi:10.1097/01.cot.0000918280.56331.e1

New Trial Results Change Practice for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

2023· article· en· W4317613998 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueOncology Times · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésLymphoblastic LeukemiaMedicineOncologyInternal medicineLeukemia

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

ALL: ALLLate-breaking research reveals a major treatment advance for adults with newly diagnosed B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The randomized Phase III study E1910 evaluated blinatumomab immunotherapy in patients with a good prognosis after an initial round of chemotherapy. After about 3.5 years of follow-up, 83 percent of the patients who went on to receive additional standard consolidation chemotherapy plus experimental blinatumomab were alive versus 65 percent of those who received chemotherapy only. Lead researcher Mark R. Litzow, MD, presented the results at the 2022 American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting (Abstract LBA1). “The addition of blinatumomab to consolidation chemotherapy represents a new standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia, who are in remission and have no measurable residual disease after induction chemotherapy,” said Litzow, Professor of Medicine at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN. Current treatments for newly diagnosed ALL frequently lead to remission. Still, unfortunately, relapses often occur in patients, leading to poor survival rates even in those with no measurable residual disease (MRD) after induction chemotherapy. An MRD test looks for any cancer cells that were not killed by cancer treatments. The goal of the E1910 trial was to further improve overall survival in patients with a better prognosis, defined as in complete remission and MRD-negative (<0.01%), by bringing blinatumomab into the frontline setting. E1910 data will be discussed with regulatory agencies for registrational purposes and blinatumomab label expansion. Blinatumomab is a targeted drug that directs a patient's T cells to recognize malignant B cells and destroy them. It has two FDA approvals for patients with B-lineage ALL: those with relapsed/refractory disease (approved in 2014) and those in first or second complete remission who test positive for MRD at >0.01 percent (approved 2018). “This is the first randomized trial to demonstrate that we are able to improve the survival of ALL patients who are in complete remission, including by sensitive MRD testing, and establishes the addition of blinatumomab immunotherapy to standard consolidation chemotherapy as the new standard of care,” said Selina M. Luger MD, FRCPC, Chair of the ECOG ACRIN Leukemia Committee and Professor of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania's Abramson Cancer Center. Study E1910 was designed and conducted independently from industry with public funding. The ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group (ECOG-ACRIN) led the trial with funding from the National Cancer Institute (NCI). Other NCI-funded network groups participated in the trial. Treatment Overview A total of 77 clinical sites in the U.S., Canada, and Israel enrolled 488 patients with newly diagnosed B-lineage ALL between December 2013 and October 2019. Patients with the BCR::ABL1 gene abnormality were not eligible. The median age was 51 years (range 30-70). The standard treatment of ALL is rather complicated, with multiple cycles of combinations of chemotherapy. The E1910 treatment overview is as follows: Step 1 Induction—All participants received 2.5 months of combination chemotherapy, including pegaspargase for those under age 55. Patients who tested positive for the B-lymphocyte antigen CD20 also received rituximab. At the end of induction, 395 patients (81%) were in remission and 333 moved on to Step 2. The rest went off the study. Step 2 Intensification—Patients received a course of therapy to stop leukemia from developing in the central nervous system, a common site of relapse if not prevented. Then, all patients were tested centrally for MRD. While the primary evaluation was in the MRD- cohort, MRD+ patients continued in the trial. Step 3 Experimental—286 patients (224 MRD- and 62 MRD+) were randomized/assigned to receive 4 cycles of consolidation chemotherapy with or without blinatumomab. Blinatumomab was given by continuous intravenous infusion for 4 weeks for each of the 4 cycles where it was provided. Seventy-two percent of patients received blinatumomab by 72- and 96-hour infusions, which overcame feasibility issues for conducting the trial. Following FDA approval of blinatumomab for MRD+ patients in March 2018, MRD+ participants were assigned to the blinatumomab arm. MRD- patients continued to be randomized. Step 4 Maintenance—Patients received POMP therapy (purinethol + oncovin + methotrexate + prednisone) for about 2 years, commonly given to keep ALL in remission and increase the chance of achieving a cure. Results A planned interim analysis showed that among the 224 MRD- patients, there were 56 deaths: 17 in the chemotherapy plus blinatumomab arm and 39 in the control chemotherapy arm. The median follow-up at the time was 43 months. Median overall survival was not reached in the chemotherapy plus blinatumomab arm versus nearly 6 years (71.4 months) in the control arm. The trial continues to follow participants. The study found no new safety concerns associated with the use of chemotherapy plus blinatumomab, and used 72- and 96-hour infusions in 72 percent of the patients. These infusion times proved necessary to feasibly conduct the trial. The researchers plan to further analyze the data to determine whether particular subgroups of patients are more likely to benefit from blinatumomab than others.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,141
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,319
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: Commentaire
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,141
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,746

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,1410,319
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0050,005
Bibliométrie0,0020,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,004
Communication savante0,0150,015
Science ouverte0,0050,004
Intégrité de la recherche0,0160,021
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0320,012

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,058
Tête enseignante GPT0,397
Écart entre enseignants0,338 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueOncology TimesMême sujetAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia researchTravaux en français237 207