MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

New Trial Results Change Practice for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

2023· article· en· W4317613998 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOncology Times · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLymphoblastic LeukemiaMedicineOncologyInternal medicineLeukemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ALL: ALLLate-breaking research reveals a major treatment advance for adults with newly diagnosed B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The randomized Phase III study E1910 evaluated blinatumomab immunotherapy in patients with a good prognosis after an initial round of chemotherapy. After about 3.5 years of follow-up, 83 percent of the patients who went on to receive additional standard consolidation chemotherapy plus experimental blinatumomab were alive versus 65 percent of those who received chemotherapy only. Lead researcher Mark R. Litzow, MD, presented the results at the 2022 American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting (Abstract LBA1). “The addition of blinatumomab to consolidation chemotherapy represents a new standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia, who are in remission and have no measurable residual disease after induction chemotherapy,” said Litzow, Professor of Medicine at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN. Current treatments for newly diagnosed ALL frequently lead to remission. Still, unfortunately, relapses often occur in patients, leading to poor survival rates even in those with no measurable residual disease (MRD) after induction chemotherapy. An MRD test looks for any cancer cells that were not killed by cancer treatments. The goal of the E1910 trial was to further improve overall survival in patients with a better prognosis, defined as in complete remission and MRD-negative (<0.01%), by bringing blinatumomab into the frontline setting. E1910 data will be discussed with regulatory agencies for registrational purposes and blinatumomab label expansion. Blinatumomab is a targeted drug that directs a patient's T cells to recognize malignant B cells and destroy them. It has two FDA approvals for patients with B-lineage ALL: those with relapsed/refractory disease (approved in 2014) and those in first or second complete remission who test positive for MRD at >0.01 percent (approved 2018). “This is the first randomized trial to demonstrate that we are able to improve the survival of ALL patients who are in complete remission, including by sensitive MRD testing, and establishes the addition of blinatumomab immunotherapy to standard consolidation chemotherapy as the new standard of care,” said Selina M. Luger MD, FRCPC, Chair of the ECOG ACRIN Leukemia Committee and Professor of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania's Abramson Cancer Center. Study E1910 was designed and conducted independently from industry with public funding. The ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group (ECOG-ACRIN) led the trial with funding from the National Cancer Institute (NCI). Other NCI-funded network groups participated in the trial. Treatment Overview A total of 77 clinical sites in the U.S., Canada, and Israel enrolled 488 patients with newly diagnosed B-lineage ALL between December 2013 and October 2019. Patients with the BCR::ABL1 gene abnormality were not eligible. The median age was 51 years (range 30-70). The standard treatment of ALL is rather complicated, with multiple cycles of combinations of chemotherapy. The E1910 treatment overview is as follows: Step 1 Induction—All participants received 2.5 months of combination chemotherapy, including pegaspargase for those under age 55. Patients who tested positive for the B-lymphocyte antigen CD20 also received rituximab. At the end of induction, 395 patients (81%) were in remission and 333 moved on to Step 2. The rest went off the study. Step 2 Intensification—Patients received a course of therapy to stop leukemia from developing in the central nervous system, a common site of relapse if not prevented. Then, all patients were tested centrally for MRD. While the primary evaluation was in the MRD- cohort, MRD+ patients continued in the trial. Step 3 Experimental—286 patients (224 MRD- and 62 MRD+) were randomized/assigned to receive 4 cycles of consolidation chemotherapy with or without blinatumomab. Blinatumomab was given by continuous intravenous infusion for 4 weeks for each of the 4 cycles where it was provided. Seventy-two percent of patients received blinatumomab by 72- and 96-hour infusions, which overcame feasibility issues for conducting the trial. Following FDA approval of blinatumomab for MRD+ patients in March 2018, MRD+ participants were assigned to the blinatumomab arm. MRD- patients continued to be randomized. Step 4 Maintenance—Patients received POMP therapy (purinethol + oncovin + methotrexate + prednisone) for about 2 years, commonly given to keep ALL in remission and increase the chance of achieving a cure. Results A planned interim analysis showed that among the 224 MRD- patients, there were 56 deaths: 17 in the chemotherapy plus blinatumomab arm and 39 in the control chemotherapy arm. The median follow-up at the time was 43 months. Median overall survival was not reached in the chemotherapy plus blinatumomab arm versus nearly 6 years (71.4 months) in the control arm. The trial continues to follow participants. The study found no new safety concerns associated with the use of chemotherapy plus blinatumomab, and used 72- and 96-hour infusions in 72 percent of the patients. These infusion times proved necessary to feasibly conduct the trial. The researchers plan to further analyze the data to determine whether particular subgroups of patients are more likely to benefit from blinatumomab than others.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.297
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.397
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOncology TimesSame topicAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia researchFrench-language works237,207