MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4318444016 · doi:10.1353/rss.2022.0011

Kurt Gödel: Logic, Exile And Insanity

2022· article· en· W4318444016 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Landon D. C. Elkind

Notice bibliographique

RevueRussell the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiquePhilosophy, Science, and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésContext (archaeology)PortraitNarrativeTheme (computing)PoliticsPresentation (obstetrics)Art historyInsanityPhilosophyArtLiteratureHistoryLawComputer sciencePolitical scienceArchaeology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Kurt Gödel: Logic, Exile And Insanity Landon D.C. Elkind Stephen Budiansky. Journey to the Edge of Reason: the Life of Kurt Gödel. New York: Norton, 2021. Pp. xi, 350. isbn: 978-1-324-00544-5; us$30, cdn$40. This is a good book for anyone with interests adjacent to Kurt Gödel (1906–1978). This includes many subscribers to this journal, who have an interest in Russell, Principia Mathematica and the work that it inspired, or the foundations of mathematics generally. Unsurprisingly, there are a few inaccuracies in the presentation of Russell (and Wittgenstein)—more on that below—but Budiansky has drawn a detailed picture of Gödel’s intellectual life and influences. Budiansky has produced an excellent and complete portrait of Gödel. The biography provides a narrative of Gödel’s life from start to finish, and contextualization of Gödel (as a person and not just as a logician or a philosopher) is the unifying theme of Budiansky’s work. This includes a first chapter on the broader historical and political context in which Gödel was raised. The rich cultural and intellectual milieu of Vienna in the 1920s is discussed: during this period there were a cornucopia of circles (discussion groups) around all kinds of topics. Budiansky’s vivid portrait of Gödel’s university life gives the impression that Plato was wrong about geometric objects: perfect circles can exist on Earth, and they roamed the cafés of Vienna. The most perfect of these was of course the Vienna Circle (though this was not Gödel’s opinion). At the Institute for Advanced Studies in Princeton, there was a similarly rich environment. But Vienna and Princeton were quite different places and Budiansky helpfully illustrates both the palatial campus buildings of the former university and the pitfalls of small-town life at the latter. And some nasty interpersonal quarrels probably made life at the Institute for Advanced Studies less happy in many ways for Gödel than before he became a full professor (at least he got a raise). [End Page 177] The various persons that Gödel met are also contextualized—Carnap, Einstein, Hilbert, Russell, Alfred Tarski, Olga Taussky, Hao Wang, and of course Wittgenstein, among many others—and his family relations are woven into the narrative, too. These thinkers’ ideas are explained to the extent necessary to situate Gödel’s reaction to them. Happily, the forest is never lost for the trees: these asides are very succinct, ensuring that the overarching narrative and aims of the book, presenting the life of Gödel, are centered. After Gödel died, his wife, Adele, left his papers to the Institute for Advanced Studies, but only after destroying many of the letters that Gödel received from his brother Rudi and from his mother Marianne—his father died while he was studying in Vienna. Adele also destroyed all the letters between them. These are great losses, but Budiansky seems to have marvellously overcome these gaps in our information about Gödel’s family. The book opens with a prologue based around Gödel’s therapist’s notes. This was entirely appropriate considering that Gödel died of starvation because he could not trust that others, including doctors, would not poison him. The biography is thus bookended by Gödel’s mental maladies. The only person he seemed to trust fully was Adele, who saved Gödel’s life too many times to count. When he checked into a mental institute in 1936 and refused to eat for fear of being poisoned, “Adele patiently sat with him hour by hour, coaxing him to eat by first tasting each spoonful of food that she personally prepared and brought to him every day” (p. 175). When Adele could not prepare his food anymore, Gödel simply could not bring himself to eat anything at all. It is a tragedy that such a clear, deductive thinker was so powerfully mentally afflicted, and poor Adele likely suffered through a great deal that we will probably never know fully. Budiansky’s book is well-written. Even where some Russell specialists might groan about longstanding and long-debunked...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,709
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,998

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,062
Tête enseignante GPT0,258
Écart entre enseignants0,196 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2022
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueRussell the Journal of Bertrand Russell StudiesMême sujetPhilosophy, Science, and HistoryTravaux en français237 207