MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4318444016 · doi:10.1353/rss.2022.0011

Kurt Gödel: Logic, Exile And Insanity

2022· article· en· W4318444016 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Landon D. C. Elkind

Bibliographic record

VenueRussell the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPhilosophy, Science, and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)PortraitNarrativeTheme (computing)PoliticsPresentation (obstetrics)Art historyInsanityPhilosophyArtLiteratureHistoryLawComputer sciencePolitical scienceArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kurt Gödel: Logic, Exile And Insanity Landon D.C. Elkind Stephen Budiansky. Journey to the Edge of Reason: the Life of Kurt Gödel. New York: Norton, 2021. Pp. xi, 350. isbn: 978-1-324-00544-5; us$30, cdn$40. This is a good book for anyone with interests adjacent to Kurt Gödel (1906–1978). This includes many subscribers to this journal, who have an interest in Russell, Principia Mathematica and the work that it inspired, or the foundations of mathematics generally. Unsurprisingly, there are a few inaccuracies in the presentation of Russell (and Wittgenstein)—more on that below—but Budiansky has drawn a detailed picture of Gödel’s intellectual life and influences. Budiansky has produced an excellent and complete portrait of Gödel. The biography provides a narrative of Gödel’s life from start to finish, and contextualization of Gödel (as a person and not just as a logician or a philosopher) is the unifying theme of Budiansky’s work. This includes a first chapter on the broader historical and political context in which Gödel was raised. The rich cultural and intellectual milieu of Vienna in the 1920s is discussed: during this period there were a cornucopia of circles (discussion groups) around all kinds of topics. Budiansky’s vivid portrait of Gödel’s university life gives the impression that Plato was wrong about geometric objects: perfect circles can exist on Earth, and they roamed the cafés of Vienna. The most perfect of these was of course the Vienna Circle (though this was not Gödel’s opinion). At the Institute for Advanced Studies in Princeton, there was a similarly rich environment. But Vienna and Princeton were quite different places and Budiansky helpfully illustrates both the palatial campus buildings of the former university and the pitfalls of small-town life at the latter. And some nasty interpersonal quarrels probably made life at the Institute for Advanced Studies less happy in many ways for Gödel than before he became a full professor (at least he got a raise). [End Page 177] The various persons that Gödel met are also contextualized—Carnap, Einstein, Hilbert, Russell, Alfred Tarski, Olga Taussky, Hao Wang, and of course Wittgenstein, among many others—and his family relations are woven into the narrative, too. These thinkers’ ideas are explained to the extent necessary to situate Gödel’s reaction to them. Happily, the forest is never lost for the trees: these asides are very succinct, ensuring that the overarching narrative and aims of the book, presenting the life of Gödel, are centered. After Gödel died, his wife, Adele, left his papers to the Institute for Advanced Studies, but only after destroying many of the letters that Gödel received from his brother Rudi and from his mother Marianne—his father died while he was studying in Vienna. Adele also destroyed all the letters between them. These are great losses, but Budiansky seems to have marvellously overcome these gaps in our information about Gödel’s family. The book opens with a prologue based around Gödel’s therapist’s notes. This was entirely appropriate considering that Gödel died of starvation because he could not trust that others, including doctors, would not poison him. The biography is thus bookended by Gödel’s mental maladies. The only person he seemed to trust fully was Adele, who saved Gödel’s life too many times to count. When he checked into a mental institute in 1936 and refused to eat for fear of being poisoned, “Adele patiently sat with him hour by hour, coaxing him to eat by first tasting each spoonful of food that she personally prepared and brought to him every day” (p. 175). When Adele could not prepare his food anymore, Gödel simply could not bring himself to eat anything at all. It is a tragedy that such a clear, deductive thinker was so powerfully mentally afflicted, and poor Adele likely suffered through a great deal that we will probably never know fully. Budiansky’s book is well-written. Even where some Russell specialists might groan about longstanding and long-debunked...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.709
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRussell the Journal of Bertrand Russell StudiesSame topicPhilosophy, Science, and HistoryFrench-language works237,207