MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4319262139 · doi:10.5694/mja2.51842

First case of mpox diagnosed in Queensland, Australia: clinical and molecular aspects

2023· article· en· W4319262139 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Adam G. Stewart, Sanmarié Schlebusch, Susan Vlack, Jamie McMahon, Mitchell A. Sullivan, Alyssa T. Pyke, Krispin Hajkowicz

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Medical Journal of Australia · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineImmunology and Microbiology
ThématiquePoxvirus research and outbreaks
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGeographyMedicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

A man in his thirties presented immediately on return from a one-month trip to Europe with widespread pustular lesions, tender lymphadenopathy, fever, and headache. Initial contact was with his general practitioner, who notified the local Public Health Unit and the Infectious Diseases Unit. He identified as a man who has sex with men. He had a background of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, which was well controlled (CD4+ cells, 1190 cells/mm3 [reference interval (RI), 560–1580 cells/mm3]; HIV viral load not detected [limit of quantitation, 20 RNA copies/mL]) with bictegravir 50 mg, emtricitabine 200 mg, and tenofovir alafenamide 25 mg daily. He first noticed a lesion resembling a pimple on the forehead while still overseas, which progressed over the six days before his return (Box 1) followed by a clustering of similar lesions over his right buttock, but no mucosal lesions. More lesions then developed over his thigh and hand. He reported intermittent rectal paraesthesia and spasm, in addition to fever and mild generalised headache. Tender inguinal and cervical lymphadenopathy became established, along with fatigue and malaise. He did not report sore throat, cough, diarrhoea, dysuria, or neck stiffness. He had had sexual contact with known cases of mpox (formerly monkeypox) in Europe. He was admitted to hospital in a single negative pressure room, with contact and airborne precautions. Full blood count and chemistry were normal, and C-reactive protein was 17 mg/L (RI, < 5 mg/L). Testing for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae was negative. Swabs were taken from the perianal lesion and sent for National Association of Testing Authorities (NATA)-accredited in-house Orthopoxvirus group real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test targeting the OPG105 gene. Positive by real-time PCR, monkeypox virus (MPXV) DNA from both the perianal lesion and throat specimens was subsequently confirmed using two additional conventional PCR tests targeting the OPG105 and OPG185 genes. Whole genome sequencing and phylogenetic analyses (Supporting Information) of a genome sequence obtained from the perianal specimen (MPXV_QLD_MX00001_2022, GenBank accession number OP235282) demonstrated placement within the human MPXV (hMPXV) sublineage B.1 of clade IIb and was most closely related to other recent 2022 MPXV sequences from the United States, Europe, Australia and Canada (Box 2). Additional laboratory methods are included in the Supporting Information. * Alignments were trimmed to remove the 5’ inverted terminal repeat (ITR) sequence and mask several repetitive regions. The newly classified MPXV phylogenetic clades I (formally Central African), IIa and IIb (formally West African) are highlighted, and the human MPXV (h) sublineages A, A.1, A.1.1 and B.1 are named at key nodes and are correspondingly denoted with coloured branches. Clade I includes a collapsed grouping of 34 sequences. The recent Queensland 2022 MPXV sequence (MPXV_QLD_OP235282_2022) is highlighted in bold blue font. No antiviral therapy was initiated, and his systemic symptoms improved rapidly over 24 hours, at which time he was discharged home to self-isolate under the care of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) virtual ward. He lived alone and was instructed to stay at home except for essential activities, such as buying groceries or solo outdoor exercise, and to avoid high risk settings and physical and intimate contact with others until all skin lesions had scabbed over. Mpox is caused by MPXV, a double-stranded DNA virus of the genus Orthopoxvirus in the family Poxviridae.1 The incubation period is five to 21 days, and most clinical infections are self-limiting. Symptoms include rash, fever, lethargy and lymphadenopathy, usually lasting two to four weeks.1 By 5 January 2023, in the current global mpox outbreak, 110 countries have reported cases, including 144 laboratory-confirmed cases in Australia.2 An international case series reported that 95% of patients presented with a rash (almost two-thirds having fewer than ten lesions), 62% reported fever, and 56% lymphadenopathy.3 Ninety-eight per cent of infected individuals were found to be gay or bisexual men, 41% had HIV infection, and MPXV was detected in 91% (29/32) of seminal fluid specimens tested. Concomitant sexually transmissible infections were reported in 29% of cases. Although MPXV was thought to be mainly transmitted via respiratory droplets and close contact with skin lesions, the current global outbreak is notable for spreading primarily during sexual contact. Fomites (eg, towels, sex toys) may be also involved in MPXV transmission. Public health interventions including case and close contact management should be provided as per the mpox guidelines from the Communicable Diseases Network Australia (CDNA).4 We were able to repurpose the existing virtual ward and public health capacity developed originally for the COVID-19 pandemic response, demonstrating the legacy of a stronger public health system able to deal with emerging infectious diseases outbreaks. There are no antiviral therapies for mpox approved by the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). However, the antiviral agent tecovirimat, which inhibits the MPXV envelope wrapping protein, is held in the National Medication Stockpile for the treatment of severe disease and for patients at risk of complications, such as severely immunosuppressed individuals and children less than eight years old.5 Vaccinia immune globulin may be an alternative therapy in pregnancy. Management is generally supportive, with careful attention to analgesia for anogenital and oropharyngeal lesions. The replication-incompetent live virus vaccine modified vaccinia Ankara–Bavarian Nordic (MVA-BN, Jynneos [Bavarian Nordic]) prevents mpox infection, although occasional breakthrough cases are described. In these cases, it may reduce the severity of mpox.6 The vaccine is not registered for use in Australia but is available via a special emergency pathway. Genetic classification of MPXV was recently revised, with new naming conventions comprising of clade I (formerly Central African) and clade II (formerly West African, further divided into IIa and IIb).7 The current 2022 human outbreak is caused by the hMPXV sublineage B.1 of clade IIb, which might cause less severe disease. Open access publishing facilitated by The University of Queensland, as part of the Wiley - The University of Queensland agreement via the Council of Australian University Librarians. Krispin Hajkowicz has received speaking fees, honoraria, advisory board fees, and a research grant from Gilead Sciences, and support from Moderna to attend an educational meeting. Adam Stewart has received speaking fees and honoraria from Gilead Sciences, and support from Pfizer for travel and meeting expenses. Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed. Supporting Information. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,531
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,947

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,063
Tête enseignante GPT0,389
Écart entre enseignants0,325 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Medical Journal of AustraliaMême sujetPoxvirus research and outbreaksTravaux en français237 207