MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4320881351 · doi:10.1186/s12916-023-02737-6

Coding long COVID: characterizing a new disease through an ICD-10 lens

2023· article· en· W4320881351 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

fundUn bailleur canadien est enregistré sur le travail.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueBMC Medicine · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueLong-Term Effects of COVID-19
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesYale Center for Clinical Investigation, Yale School of MedicineColorado Clinical and Translational Sciences InstituteNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesNational Institute of Environmental Health SciencesNational Institute of General Medical SciencesNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteClinical and Translational Science Center, University of New MexicoClinical and Translational Science Institute, Boston UniversityCenter for Clinical and Translational Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at HoustonInstitute for Integration of Medicine and ScienceCenter for Clinical and Translational Science, Mayo ClinicUniversity of Colorado DenverLeonard M. Miller School of MedicineUniversity of California, IrvineUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillOregon Clinical and Translational Research InstituteUniversity of California, DavisWeill Cornell Medical CollegeUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignNational Institutes of HealthInstitute for Clinical and Translational Science, University of California, IrvineOchsner HealthUniversity of California, San FranciscoLouisiana Clinical and Translational Science CenterTufts Medical CenterInstitute of Translational Health SciencesChildren's National HospitalUniversity of Arkansas for Medical SciencesVanderbilt University Medical CenterTranslational Research Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical SciencesNorthShore University HealthSystemRutgers, The State University of New JerseyUniversity at BuffaloUniversity of RochesterAurora Health CareInstitute of Clinical and Translational SciencesInstitute for Translational Medicine and TherapeuticsUniversity of California, San DiegoJohns Hopkins UniversityInstitute for Clinical and Translational Research, University of Wisconsin, MadisonPennsylvania State UniversityVanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUniversity of California, Los AngelesBill and Melinda Gates FoundationUniversity of WashingtonFrontiers Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of KansasUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at San AntonioLoyola University ChicagoUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at HoustonWashington University in St. LouisUniversity of MichiganHarvard CatalystUniversity of MinnesotaChildren's Hospital of PhiladelphiaMichigan Institute for Clinical and Health ResearchUniversity of UtahUniversity of PennsylvaniaGeorge Washington UniversityVanderbilt UniversityAccelerated Innovation Research Initiative Turning Top Science and Ideas into High-Impact ValuesUniversity of ChicagoGeorgia Clinical and Translational Science AllianceVirginia Commonwealth UniversityTulane UniversityBrown UniversityRush UniversityCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical CenterYale UniversityUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonOhio State UniversityPenn State Clinical and Translational Science InstituteChildren's Hospital ColoradoYork UniversityUniversity of MiamiCenter for Clinical and Translational ResearchEmory UniversityCarilion Clinic
Mots-clésMedicineMedical diagnosisPopulationPandemicContext (archaeology)DiseaseCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Diagnosis codeCoding (social sciences)Intensive care medicineInfectious disease (medical specialty)PathologyEnvironmental healthStatistics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Naming a newly discovered disease is a difficult process; in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and the existence of post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC), which includes long COVID, it has proven especially challenging. Disease definitions and assignment of a diagnosis code are often asynchronous and iterative. The clinical definition and our understanding of the underlying mechanisms of long COVID are still in flux, and the deployment of an ICD-10-CM code for long COVID in the USA took nearly 2 years after patients had begun to describe their condition. Here, we leverage the largest publicly available HIPAA-limited dataset about patients with COVID-19 in the US to examine the heterogeneity of adoption and use of U09.9, the ICD-10-CM code for "Post COVID-19 condition, unspecified." METHODS: We undertook a number of analyses to characterize the N3C population with a U09.9 diagnosis code (n = 33,782), including assessing person-level demographics and a number of area-level social determinants of health; diagnoses commonly co-occurring with U09.9, clustered using the Louvain algorithm; and quantifying medications and procedures recorded within 60 days of U09.9 diagnosis. We stratified all analyses by age group in order to discern differing patterns of care across the lifespan. RESULTS: We established the diagnoses most commonly co-occurring with U09.9 and algorithmically clustered them into four major categories: cardiopulmonary, neurological, gastrointestinal, and comorbid conditions. Importantly, we discovered that the population of patients diagnosed with U09.9 is demographically skewed toward female, White, non-Hispanic individuals, as well as individuals living in areas with low poverty and low unemployment. Our results also include a characterization of common procedures and medications associated with U09.9-coded patients. CONCLUSIONS: This work offers insight into potential subtypes and current practice patterns around long COVID and speaks to the existence of disparities in the diagnosis of patients with long COVID. This latter finding in particular requires further research and urgent remediation.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,187
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,005
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,073
Tête enseignante GPT0,369
Écart entre enseignants0,296 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle