MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4321354187 · doi:10.1353/nin.2023.0022

Whispers of the Gods: Tales from Baseball’s Golden Age, Told by the Men Who Played It by Peter Golenbock

2023· article· en· W4321354187 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
R. Zachary Sanzone

Notice bibliographique

RevueNine · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueAmerican Sports and Literature
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGloryStyle (visual arts)Art historyArtClassicsHistoryLiterature

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Whispers of the Gods: Tales from Baseball’s Golden Age, Told by the Men Who Played It by Peter Golenbock R. Zachary Sanzone Peter Golenbock. Whispers of the Gods: Tales from Baseball’s Golden Age, Told by the Men Who Played It. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2022. 216 pp. $24.95. Whispers of the Gods details hundreds of hours of interviews Golenbock conducted with former major leaguers such as Roy Campanella, Roger Maris, Ted [End Page 139] Williams, Monte Irving, and Rex Barney. These interviews, which Golenbock collected over the course of a few decades, give baseball fans new insight into the lives and opinions of their heroes. Golenbock’s new book closely resembles the style of writing and research seen in Lawrence Ritter’s classic The Glory of Their Times: The Story of the Early Days of Baseball Told by the Men Who Played It, which has emerged as a classic baseball book since its publication. Golenbock acknowledges just as much in the preface where he writes, “To this day I think of The Glory of Their Times as the bible of baseball” (xi). While it’s clear that Ritter’s book had a strong influence, Golenbock, a master of the oral tradition, manages to give baseball fans new information about their heroes without repeating what other writers and scholars have already written. Golenbock, the author of several dozen baseball books, including Bums and The Bronx Zoo (coauthored with Sparky Lyle), recounts discussions with famous players like Ted Williams, who boisterously expresses his support for Shoeless Joe Jackson’s induction into the Baseball Hall of Fame. What I appreciate about this chapter is that Golenbock doesn’t really take a side in the debate. He includes details Williams recounted that both support and reject the call for Jackson’s induction. Williams recognizes that while Jackson did have the highest batting average of the 1919 World Series, he also took the gamblers’ money. While I personally don’t have a vested interest in the debate— I could take or leave Jackson— it’s worth pointing out that Golenbock doesn’t allow any bias of his own to sway readers one way or the other. This is particularly important in this day and age where current events have driven people to develop stronger than normal opinions about almost everything. Perhaps more importantly though, the consideration regarding whether Shoeless Joe Jackson belongs in the Hall of Fame or not is one of the most contentious and hotly debated discussions in baseball today. Despite the combative debate, Golenbock manages to keep any personal views of his own in check— not an easy thing to do when Shoeless Joe is the topic of discussion—and allows his subjects to speak for themselves, a sign of true, objective reporting. While Golenbock includes Hall of Famers like Ted Williams, Stan Musial, and Roy Campanella, he also includes lesser-known players like Rex Barney, who pitched for the Brooklyn Dodgers from 1943 to 1950. Despite a better- than- average major league career— he won fifteen games in 1948, including a no- hitter against the New York Giants— control issues led to an early departure from baseball. Despite a somewhat premature end to his pitching career, Barney enjoyed a second career as PA announcer for the Baltimore Orioles from 1969 until his death in 1997. Barney’s name isn’t often mentioned in the debates over who the best pitcher was of the 1940s, but that doesn’t mean he [End Page 140] didn’t play a significant role in baseball history— Barney witnessed Jackie Robinson break Major League Baseball’s color barrier in 1947. Baseball writers should appreciate these little snippets of history told by those who are all but forgotten. While figures like Red Barber, Branch Rickey, Pee Wee Reese, and Roy Campanella have discussed Robinson in great detail through their own autobiographies, in my opinion, many of those stories grow repetitive, often recounting the same details about Robinson’s integration (though that’s not to say they aren’t important). Barney was on hand to see Robinson not only integrate the game but give firsthand details about Robinson’s experiences in the minors...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,035
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,096

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0100,002
Communication savante0,0060,004
Science ouverte0,0010,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,005
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0290,006

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,208
Écart entre enseignants0,197 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueNineMême sujetAmerican Sports and LiteratureTravaux en français237 207