Whispers of the Gods: Tales from Baseball’s Golden Age, Told by the Men Who Played It by Peter Golenbock
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reviewed by: Whispers of the Gods: Tales from Baseball’s Golden Age, Told by the Men Who Played It by Peter Golenbock R. Zachary Sanzone Peter Golenbock. Whispers of the Gods: Tales from Baseball’s Golden Age, Told by the Men Who Played It. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2022. 216 pp. $24.95. Whispers of the Gods details hundreds of hours of interviews Golenbock conducted with former major leaguers such as Roy Campanella, Roger Maris, Ted [End Page 139] Williams, Monte Irving, and Rex Barney. These interviews, which Golenbock collected over the course of a few decades, give baseball fans new insight into the lives and opinions of their heroes. Golenbock’s new book closely resembles the style of writing and research seen in Lawrence Ritter’s classic The Glory of Their Times: The Story of the Early Days of Baseball Told by the Men Who Played It, which has emerged as a classic baseball book since its publication. Golenbock acknowledges just as much in the preface where he writes, “To this day I think of The Glory of Their Times as the bible of baseball” (xi). While it’s clear that Ritter’s book had a strong influence, Golenbock, a master of the oral tradition, manages to give baseball fans new information about their heroes without repeating what other writers and scholars have already written. Golenbock, the author of several dozen baseball books, including Bums and The Bronx Zoo (coauthored with Sparky Lyle), recounts discussions with famous players like Ted Williams, who boisterously expresses his support for Shoeless Joe Jackson’s induction into the Baseball Hall of Fame. What I appreciate about this chapter is that Golenbock doesn’t really take a side in the debate. He includes details Williams recounted that both support and reject the call for Jackson’s induction. Williams recognizes that while Jackson did have the highest batting average of the 1919 World Series, he also took the gamblers’ money. While I personally don’t have a vested interest in the debate— I could take or leave Jackson— it’s worth pointing out that Golenbock doesn’t allow any bias of his own to sway readers one way or the other. This is particularly important in this day and age where current events have driven people to develop stronger than normal opinions about almost everything. Perhaps more importantly though, the consideration regarding whether Shoeless Joe Jackson belongs in the Hall of Fame or not is one of the most contentious and hotly debated discussions in baseball today. Despite the combative debate, Golenbock manages to keep any personal views of his own in check— not an easy thing to do when Shoeless Joe is the topic of discussion—and allows his subjects to speak for themselves, a sign of true, objective reporting. While Golenbock includes Hall of Famers like Ted Williams, Stan Musial, and Roy Campanella, he also includes lesser-known players like Rex Barney, who pitched for the Brooklyn Dodgers from 1943 to 1950. Despite a better- than- average major league career— he won fifteen games in 1948, including a no- hitter against the New York Giants— control issues led to an early departure from baseball. Despite a somewhat premature end to his pitching career, Barney enjoyed a second career as PA announcer for the Baltimore Orioles from 1969 until his death in 1997. Barney’s name isn’t often mentioned in the debates over who the best pitcher was of the 1940s, but that doesn’t mean he [End Page 140] didn’t play a significant role in baseball history— Barney witnessed Jackie Robinson break Major League Baseball’s color barrier in 1947. Baseball writers should appreciate these little snippets of history told by those who are all but forgotten. While figures like Red Barber, Branch Rickey, Pee Wee Reese, and Roy Campanella have discussed Robinson in great detail through their own autobiographies, in my opinion, many of those stories grow repetitive, often recounting the same details about Robinson’s integration (though that’s not to say they aren’t important). Barney was on hand to see Robinson not only integrate the game but give firsthand details about Robinson’s experiences in the minors...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".