MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4321367351 · doi:10.1097/01.cot.0000920816.64648.fd

Formula-Fed Preterm Infants More Likely to Have Iron Deficiency

2023· article· en· W4321367351 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mark L. Fuerst

Notice bibliographique

RevueOncology Times · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueIron Metabolism and Disorders
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineFormula feedingPediatricsBreast milkInfant formulaIron deficiencyIron supplementationIron statusBreast feedingAnemiaPsychiatry

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

infant: infantFormula-fed very preterm infants are more likely to have iron deficiency even though they have higher iron intake than breastfed infants, according to a new Canadian study. Preterm infants are at increased risk of developing iron deficiency, which is associated with developmental and behavioral problems later in life. Breastfed infants, in particular, are considered at increased risk of iron deficiency because breast milk has a low iron content, compared with standard infant formula. “Just because infants are on iron-rich formula, we should not assume all of their iron needs are being met, since iron from the formula may not have the same absorption as iron from breast milk,” said Grace Power, a third-year medical student at Dalhousie University in Nova Scotia, Canada. “These findings suggest we might need to rethink some of the guidelines for iron supplementation.” Iron supplementation is consistently recommended for breastfed preterm infants. Canadian Pediatric Society guidelines issued in 2019 recommend that breastfed preterm infants receive iron supplementation of 2-3 mg/kg/day. Formula-fed preterm infants tend to receive that amount and, therefore, the guidelines do not suggest they need iron supplementation. But “the guidelines lack strong scientific evidence and are based on clinical opinion,” said Power at a press briefing during the 2022 American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting (Abstract 3663s). She noted that the American Academy of Pediatrics provides no recommendations on iron supplementation in formula-fed preterm infants. “Recommendations for iron supplementation for formula-fed preterm infants are not very clear. There is very little research looking at how feeding type relates to iron deficiency in preterm infants,” said Power. Study Details Abstract 3663 Power and colleagues set out to investigate how the type of feeding influences the iron status of very preterm infants at 4-6 months corrected age. They conducted a retrospective population-based cohort study to analyze health records from 392 very preterm infants, born before 31 weeks gestation, in Nova Scotia from 2005 to 2018. All preterm infants born in the province are followed through a single medical center, therefore the dataset is considered to be representative of the general Canadian population in terms of patient demographics and health care protocols. Of the 392 infants, 285 infants were exclusively fed iron-rich formula and 107 infants were partially or exclusively breastfed. Researchers extracted data on feeding practices, iron intake from formula and iron supplements, and iron levels in the blood taken at 4 and 6 months of age, with ages corrected for prematurity by subtracting the number of weeks early each infant was born from the actual age. The results show that formula-fed infants had a significantly higher daily iron intake than breastfed infants, but 36.8 percent of formula-fed infants and 20.6 percent of breastfed infants were iron-deficient, suggesting that higher iron intake in formula does not always translate into higher iron stores in the blood. Formula-fed infants who were born earlier, those who were born smaller, and those who had received blood transfusions were found to be at greater risk for iron deficiency than other formula-fed infants. Power noted that 80 percent of formula-fed infants failed to receive at least 2 mg/kg/day from formula alone. One likely explanation is the different chemical composition of breast milk. Breast milk contains lactoferrin, which aids iron absorption. Therefore, iron from breast milk may be better absorbed than iron from formula. “Most of formula-fed very preterm infants failed to receive at least 2 mg/kg/day from formula alone, contradicting the supposition of the Canadian Pediatric Society guidelines,” Power stated. “Despite higher iron intake overall, iron deficiency was more prevalent in formula-fed infants than in breastfed infants. This suggests a need to revisit recommendations on iron supplementation in formula-fed very preterm infants.” Clinically, physicians should consider the individual risk for iron deficiency when deciding whether and how to supplement these infants with iron. “We should not assume a one-size-fits-all approach to iron supplementation,” said Power. She suggested that preterm babies could benefit from closer monitoring, especially those who are exclusively fed formula. “If iron stores are checked in time and infants are regularly supplemented with iron as needed, we can still prevent iron deficiency,” Power concluded. Mark L. Fuerst is a contributing writer.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,055
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,110

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0110,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,018
Tête enseignante GPT0,325
Écart entre enseignants0,307 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueOncology TimesMême sujetIron Metabolism and DisordersTravaux en français237 207