MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Formula-Fed Preterm Infants More Likely to Have Iron Deficiency

2023· article· en· W4321367351 on OpenAlex
Mark L. Fuerst

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOncology Times · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIron Metabolism and Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFormula feedingPediatricsBreast milkInfant formulaIron deficiencyIron supplementationIron statusBreast feedingAnemiaPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

infant: infantFormula-fed very preterm infants are more likely to have iron deficiency even though they have higher iron intake than breastfed infants, according to a new Canadian study. Preterm infants are at increased risk of developing iron deficiency, which is associated with developmental and behavioral problems later in life. Breastfed infants, in particular, are considered at increased risk of iron deficiency because breast milk has a low iron content, compared with standard infant formula. “Just because infants are on iron-rich formula, we should not assume all of their iron needs are being met, since iron from the formula may not have the same absorption as iron from breast milk,” said Grace Power, a third-year medical student at Dalhousie University in Nova Scotia, Canada. “These findings suggest we might need to rethink some of the guidelines for iron supplementation.” Iron supplementation is consistently recommended for breastfed preterm infants. Canadian Pediatric Society guidelines issued in 2019 recommend that breastfed preterm infants receive iron supplementation of 2-3 mg/kg/day. Formula-fed preterm infants tend to receive that amount and, therefore, the guidelines do not suggest they need iron supplementation. But “the guidelines lack strong scientific evidence and are based on clinical opinion,” said Power at a press briefing during the 2022 American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting (Abstract 3663s). She noted that the American Academy of Pediatrics provides no recommendations on iron supplementation in formula-fed preterm infants. “Recommendations for iron supplementation for formula-fed preterm infants are not very clear. There is very little research looking at how feeding type relates to iron deficiency in preterm infants,” said Power. Study Details Abstract 3663 Power and colleagues set out to investigate how the type of feeding influences the iron status of very preterm infants at 4-6 months corrected age. They conducted a retrospective population-based cohort study to analyze health records from 392 very preterm infants, born before 31 weeks gestation, in Nova Scotia from 2005 to 2018. All preterm infants born in the province are followed through a single medical center, therefore the dataset is considered to be representative of the general Canadian population in terms of patient demographics and health care protocols. Of the 392 infants, 285 infants were exclusively fed iron-rich formula and 107 infants were partially or exclusively breastfed. Researchers extracted data on feeding practices, iron intake from formula and iron supplements, and iron levels in the blood taken at 4 and 6 months of age, with ages corrected for prematurity by subtracting the number of weeks early each infant was born from the actual age. The results show that formula-fed infants had a significantly higher daily iron intake than breastfed infants, but 36.8 percent of formula-fed infants and 20.6 percent of breastfed infants were iron-deficient, suggesting that higher iron intake in formula does not always translate into higher iron stores in the blood. Formula-fed infants who were born earlier, those who were born smaller, and those who had received blood transfusions were found to be at greater risk for iron deficiency than other formula-fed infants. Power noted that 80 percent of formula-fed infants failed to receive at least 2 mg/kg/day from formula alone. One likely explanation is the different chemical composition of breast milk. Breast milk contains lactoferrin, which aids iron absorption. Therefore, iron from breast milk may be better absorbed than iron from formula. “Most of formula-fed very preterm infants failed to receive at least 2 mg/kg/day from formula alone, contradicting the supposition of the Canadian Pediatric Society guidelines,” Power stated. “Despite higher iron intake overall, iron deficiency was more prevalent in formula-fed infants than in breastfed infants. This suggests a need to revisit recommendations on iron supplementation in formula-fed very preterm infants.” Clinically, physicians should consider the individual risk for iron deficiency when deciding whether and how to supplement these infants with iron. “We should not assume a one-size-fits-all approach to iron supplementation,” said Power. She suggested that preterm babies could benefit from closer monitoring, especially those who are exclusively fed formula. “If iron stores are checked in time and infants are regularly supplemented with iron as needed, we can still prevent iron deficiency,” Power concluded. Mark L. Fuerst is a contributing writer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.488
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it