New York's War of 1812: Politics, Society, and Combat by Richard V. Barbuto
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: New York's War of 1812: Politics, Society, and Combat by Richard V. Barbuto Harvey Strum (bio) New York's War of 1812: Politics, Society, and Combat By Richard V. Barbuto. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 2021. 364 pages, 6" × 9", 10 b&w illus., 6 maps, 1 table. $39.95 cloth, $24.95 paperback, $32.95 e-book. Richard Barbuto's New York's War of 1812 presents a fascinating account of the military history of New York during the War of 1812 and can be considered the definitive work on the war. We needed a full-length account since we previously had only several regional studies, like Harry Landon's Bugles on the Border: The Story of the War of 1812 in Northern New York, Allan Everest's The War of 1812 in the Champlain Valley, or David Fitz-Enz's Final Invasion: Plattsburgh, the War of 1812's Most Decisive Battle. Richard V. Barbuto fills the need for a comprehensive analysis of the war's military events that has not been provided by any other historians. While the War of 1812, as Barbuto emphasizes, was New York's war, the state's government, unlike Maryland's, has done virtually nothing to commemorate these important historical events. Governor Daniel Tompkins emerges during the war as the best wartime executive. Tompkins succeeded in mobilizing the manpower and resources of the state. He did his best to arm, equip, feed, and shelter the militia called up for service. Tompkins's leadership led to the successful fortification of the approaches to New York City, preventing a repeat of the British occupation of the city during the Revolution. Throughout the war, Tompkins marshaled the resources to send to the frontiers of the state. Barbuto criticizes President Madison and War Department leaders for repeatedly failing to adequately supply and provide effective leadership for the regulars and the militia. In addition, Barbuto blames the Federalists in 1812 and 1813 for their unwillingness to support the governor in his efforts to provide the necessary financial resources to sustain the war effort. An important point raised in this study is the need for cooperation between the state and federal governments to wage the war, and Barbuto gives Governor Tompkins high marks for his consistent actions to foster state-federal cooperation, which President Madison eventually recognized. Tompkins took the initiative because the federal government failed to do its part, crippling the ability of the governor to fully mobilize the state's resources. One of the strengths of [End Page 389] Barbuto's analysis is his emphasis of the relationship between the federal government and state leadership, an issue not necessarily stressed in other military histories of the war. Barbuto evaluates the barriers to military success. Citing Lt. Joseph Hawley Dwight, Barbuto highlights one of the ongoing internal problems—the willingness of younger officers to fight and go on the offensive and the reluctance of senior officers "who appeared cautious to a fault" (135). This occurred during the failed 1812 Niagara campaign and in 1813, too; but this division within the ranks of both the regulars and the militia reappeared throughout the war. The reluctance of senior officers to lead demoralized troops contributed to the unwillingness of the soldiers to risk their lives when they had no faith in their senior officers, like General Smyth. Some of the officers of the regulars, like Smyth, detested the militia, and this prevented effective military cohesion in both offensive and defensive operations. If effective and heroic militia officers, like Jacob Brown and Peter Porter, led their men, the militia performed well. At the opposite end of the spectrum was Brig. Gen. George McClure, who "entered the annals of infamy" (177) by ordering the destruction of Newark, Canada, which led to the British retaliation along the Niagara Frontier. Barbuto also explores the problems of logistics, offering a careful and sophisticated analysis of the difficulties faced by the militia and the regulars, issues often underemphasized in other studies. Divided into eighteen chapters covering every significant battle, raid, and military operation in the state, this study addresses every military campaign and all significant failures and successes. Six chapters concentrate on the Niagara...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».