Saving the Oregon Trail: Ezra Meeker's Last Grand Quest by Dennis M. Larsen
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: Saving the Oregon Trail: Ezra Meeker's Last Grand Quest by Dennis M. Larsen B. J. Hollars Saving the Oregon Trail: Ezra Meeker's Last Grand Quest. By Dennis M. Larsen. Pullman: Washington State University Press, 2020. 278 pages. Illustrations, maps, notes, bibliography, index. $28.95 paper. In his fourth and final installment of Ezra Meeker's biography, retired history teacher and trail scholar Dennis M. Larsen provides a meticulously researched account of Meeker's final decades—an era in which the Oregon Trail's most enthusiastic advocate stopped at nothing to memorialize the trail for future generations. Beginning with Meeker's 1901 return to Puyallup, Washington, following a stint in the Yukon, Larsen traces Meeker's various attempts to preserve the trail's legacy, most notably by the emigrant's retracing the same trail that he had first traveled half a century prior. While Meeker's unflagging commitment to trail preservation served as one motivation for his later-in-life trips, paying off his creditors was another. Meeker's entrepreneurial spirit was admirable, though not always successful. His many failed ventures all but demanded that he embark upon his perpetual roadshow of lecturing, peddling postcards, and continually raising funds for both trail monuments and his own preservation. Meeker's many ill-fated business dealings relied upon a revolving door of financiers, some of whom lost confidence in Meeker as the years passed. But Meeker never lost faith in himself and, in the end, his near-megalomaniacal attempts to preserve the legacy of the Oregon Trail proved successful. Though the book occasionally veers into minutiae—providing pages of details when a footnote might do—it could be argued that every detail helps shape Meeker's story, which [End Page 271] is nuanced, complex, and well told in Larsen's capable hands. The result is an evenhanded account of a man neither heroized nor vilified. And a man who, in his later years, appeared to be caught between two eras: simultaneously holding fast to a fading past while propelling the Oregon Trail's story into the future by way of monuments and motion pictures. As Larsen makes clear, Ezra Meeker was many things: eccentric, charismatic, stubborn, spirited, savvy, persuasive, and indefatigable most of all. The man wore many hats, even if some fit better than others. In his final assessment, Larsen lauds Meeker for his "willingness to take risks and embrace the new," as well as his "boundless capacity for work," and his "unrelenting competitive drive . . . strict moral compass, and . . . unerring vision of the future." Indeed, Meeker was all these and more. For a man who so dutifully preserved Oregon Trail history for the rest of us, it is only fitting we preserve Meeker's memory, too. B. J. Hollars Department of English University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire Copyright © 2023 Center for Great Plains Studies, University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,008 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».