MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4322393063 · doi:10.1353/gpq.2022.0031

Saving the Oregon Trail: Ezra Meeker's Last Grand Quest by Dennis M. Larsen

2022· article· en· W4322393063 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
B. J. Hollars

Bibliographic record

VenueGreat plains quarterly · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicVietnamese History and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNothingFaithBiographyArt historyHistoryClassicsTheologyPhilosophyEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Saving the Oregon Trail: Ezra Meeker's Last Grand Quest by Dennis M. Larsen B. J. Hollars Saving the Oregon Trail: Ezra Meeker's Last Grand Quest. By Dennis M. Larsen. Pullman: Washington State University Press, 2020. 278 pages. Illustrations, maps, notes, bibliography, index. $28.95 paper. In his fourth and final installment of Ezra Meeker's biography, retired history teacher and trail scholar Dennis M. Larsen provides a meticulously researched account of Meeker's final decades—an era in which the Oregon Trail's most enthusiastic advocate stopped at nothing to memorialize the trail for future generations. Beginning with Meeker's 1901 return to Puyallup, Washington, following a stint in the Yukon, Larsen traces Meeker's various attempts to preserve the trail's legacy, most notably by the emigrant's retracing the same trail that he had first traveled half a century prior. While Meeker's unflagging commitment to trail preservation served as one motivation for his later-in-life trips, paying off his creditors was another. Meeker's entrepreneurial spirit was admirable, though not always successful. His many failed ventures all but demanded that he embark upon his perpetual roadshow of lecturing, peddling postcards, and continually raising funds for both trail monuments and his own preservation. Meeker's many ill-fated business dealings relied upon a revolving door of financiers, some of whom lost confidence in Meeker as the years passed. But Meeker never lost faith in himself and, in the end, his near-megalomaniacal attempts to preserve the legacy of the Oregon Trail proved successful. Though the book occasionally veers into minutiae—providing pages of details when a footnote might do—it could be argued that every detail helps shape Meeker's story, which [End Page 271] is nuanced, complex, and well told in Larsen's capable hands. The result is an evenhanded account of a man neither heroized nor vilified. And a man who, in his later years, appeared to be caught between two eras: simultaneously holding fast to a fading past while propelling the Oregon Trail's story into the future by way of monuments and motion pictures. As Larsen makes clear, Ezra Meeker was many things: eccentric, charismatic, stubborn, spirited, savvy, persuasive, and indefatigable most of all. The man wore many hats, even if some fit better than others. In his final assessment, Larsen lauds Meeker for his "willingness to take risks and embrace the new," as well as his "boundless capacity for work," and his "unrelenting competitive drive . . . strict moral compass, and . . . unerring vision of the future." Indeed, Meeker was all these and more. For a man who so dutifully preserved Oregon Trail history for the rest of us, it is only fitting we preserve Meeker's memory, too. B. J. Hollars Department of English University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire Copyright © 2023 Center for Great Plains Studies, University of Nebraska–Lincoln

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.558
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0080.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGreat plains quarterlySame topicVietnamese History and Culture StudiesFrench-language works237,207