MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4322719265 · doi:10.1094/pdis-10-22-2315-pdn

First Report of <i>Puccinia glechomatis</i>, a Rust Fungus of Creeping Charlie, in Minnesota

2023· article· en· W4322719265 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nicholas Greatens, Nick Klejeski, Les J. Szabo, Yue Jin, Pablo Daniel Olivera Firpo

Notice bibliographique

RevuePlant Disease · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueYeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesMinnesota Invasive Terrestrial Plants and Pests Center, University of Minnesota
Mots-clésBiologyRust (programming language)DewInoculationBotanySmutHorticultureWeedFungusSpore

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

In 2020 and 2021, at four locations around the Twin Cities, Minnesota (Sep. 2021: 44.980, -93.319; Aug 2021: 44.989, -93.186; Sep 2020: 45.000, -93.138; Sep. 2020: 44.870, -92.779), a rust fungus was observed infecting creeping charlie (Glechoma hederacea), a weed of Eurasian origin (Hutchings and Price, 1999). Within stands, severity ranged from 1 to 30 % leaf loss. Telia were reddish-brown when young, starting small (0.1 to 0.5 mm), and growing into round but irregular sori measuring 1 to 5 mm, sometimes coalescing to form larger sori (Fig 1A). Sori are primarily abaxial, forming depressions on the adaxial surface, and sometimes occurring along stems and leaf petioles. Partial leaf necrosis occurs with high foliar infection and leaf dieback with high infection of petioles. Thin-walled, colorless leptosporic teliospores, or leptospores, (Fig 1B) were present in samples. Dark, thick-walled teliospores were not noted. Leaves bearing leptospores were soaked in water for four hours and suspended over young plants in a dew chamber at 20 °C for 16 hours. Plants were maintained in a greenhouse at 20-22 °C. After three weeks, nascent telia were observed on inoculated plants. The ITS region and a segment of EF1-α were selected for sequencing for the samples from the first two listed locations. For the ITS, the primers ITS1rustF10d (Barnes and Szabo, 2007) and ITSRu1 (Rioux et al., 2015) were used, and for EF1-α, a reaction was conducted following van der Merwe (2007). Amplicons were barcoded and sequenced on an Oxford Nanopore MinIon following manufacturer instructions (kits EXP-PBC001 and SQK-LSK109 with R9 flow cells). Reads (PRJNA802185) were filtered for quality (> Q16), sorted and separated by length, and aligned. A consensus sequence was generated for each amplicon with >50x coverage. BLAST searches of the EF1-α sequences OM489402 and OM489403 from the first two locations respectively showed 99.3 % (643/647) and 99.7 % (645/647) similarity with Puccinia glechomatis (EF560587). ITS sequences had not been reported for P. glechomatis, and there are no matches with >96 % homology in GenBank for the sequences OM470970 or OM470969, from the same samples. Morphological and life cycle traits are consistent with this identification. Creeping charlie is a common weed of turf, gardens, orchards, forests, and meadows. It is present in 46 of the lower 48 United States but is most common east of the Great Plains, in the Pacific Northwest, and in neighboring regions of southern Canada (Böllman and Scholler, 2004). P. glechomatis was recorded for the first time in 1992 in north-central Pennsylvania (Böllmann and Scholler, 2006). Examination of herbarium specimens and surveys established its distribution across the eastern U.S. and in a small area in the Pacific Northwest by the early 2000s, and in 2001 its presence was recorded in southern Wisconsin (Böllmann and Scholler, 2006). The basidiospores likely do not travel far, but the fungus may move long distances through plant matter and establish in new locations (Böllmann and Scholler, 2006). P. glechomatis is not known to affect native plants and may have a positive ecological effect, reducing the vigor of its undesirable host. To our knowledge, this is the first report of P. glechomatis in Minnesota. It is evidence of the continued westward spread of this rust in North America (Böllmann and Scholler, 2006). Sequenced samples were submitted to the Arthur Fungarium at Purdue University (PUR N24012 and PUR N24013, respectively).

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,182
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,391

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,011
Tête enseignante GPT0,234
Écart entre enseignants0,222 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePlant DiseaseMême sujetYeasts and Rust Fungi StudiesTravaux en français237 207