MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4322719265 · doi:10.1094/pdis-10-22-2315-pdn

First Report of <i>Puccinia glechomatis</i>, a Rust Fungus of Creeping Charlie, in Minnesota

2023· article· en· W4322719265 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nicholas Greatens, Nick Klejeski, Les J. Szabo, Yue Jin, Pablo Daniel Olivera Firpo

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Disease · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicYeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinnesota Invasive Terrestrial Plants and Pests Center, University of Minnesota
KeywordsBiologyRust (programming language)DewInoculationBotanySmutHorticultureWeedFungusSpore

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 2020 and 2021, at four locations around the Twin Cities, Minnesota (Sep. 2021: 44.980, -93.319; Aug 2021: 44.989, -93.186; Sep 2020: 45.000, -93.138; Sep. 2020: 44.870, -92.779), a rust fungus was observed infecting creeping charlie (Glechoma hederacea), a weed of Eurasian origin (Hutchings and Price, 1999). Within stands, severity ranged from 1 to 30 % leaf loss. Telia were reddish-brown when young, starting small (0.1 to 0.5 mm), and growing into round but irregular sori measuring 1 to 5 mm, sometimes coalescing to form larger sori (Fig 1A). Sori are primarily abaxial, forming depressions on the adaxial surface, and sometimes occurring along stems and leaf petioles. Partial leaf necrosis occurs with high foliar infection and leaf dieback with high infection of petioles. Thin-walled, colorless leptosporic teliospores, or leptospores, (Fig 1B) were present in samples. Dark, thick-walled teliospores were not noted. Leaves bearing leptospores were soaked in water for four hours and suspended over young plants in a dew chamber at 20 °C for 16 hours. Plants were maintained in a greenhouse at 20-22 °C. After three weeks, nascent telia were observed on inoculated plants. The ITS region and a segment of EF1-α were selected for sequencing for the samples from the first two listed locations. For the ITS, the primers ITS1rustF10d (Barnes and Szabo, 2007) and ITSRu1 (Rioux et al., 2015) were used, and for EF1-α, a reaction was conducted following van der Merwe (2007). Amplicons were barcoded and sequenced on an Oxford Nanopore MinIon following manufacturer instructions (kits EXP-PBC001 and SQK-LSK109 with R9 flow cells). Reads (PRJNA802185) were filtered for quality (> Q16), sorted and separated by length, and aligned. A consensus sequence was generated for each amplicon with >50x coverage. BLAST searches of the EF1-α sequences OM489402 and OM489403 from the first two locations respectively showed 99.3 % (643/647) and 99.7 % (645/647) similarity with Puccinia glechomatis (EF560587). ITS sequences had not been reported for P. glechomatis, and there are no matches with >96 % homology in GenBank for the sequences OM470970 or OM470969, from the same samples. Morphological and life cycle traits are consistent with this identification. Creeping charlie is a common weed of turf, gardens, orchards, forests, and meadows. It is present in 46 of the lower 48 United States but is most common east of the Great Plains, in the Pacific Northwest, and in neighboring regions of southern Canada (Böllman and Scholler, 2004). P. glechomatis was recorded for the first time in 1992 in north-central Pennsylvania (Böllmann and Scholler, 2006). Examination of herbarium specimens and surveys established its distribution across the eastern U.S. and in a small area in the Pacific Northwest by the early 2000s, and in 2001 its presence was recorded in southern Wisconsin (Böllmann and Scholler, 2006). The basidiospores likely do not travel far, but the fungus may move long distances through plant matter and establish in new locations (Böllmann and Scholler, 2006). P. glechomatis is not known to affect native plants and may have a positive ecological effect, reducing the vigor of its undesirable host. To our knowledge, this is the first report of P. glechomatis in Minnesota. It is evidence of the continued westward spread of this rust in North America (Böllmann and Scholler, 2006). Sequenced samples were submitted to the Arthur Fungarium at Purdue University (PUR N24012 and PUR N24013, respectively).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.182
Threshold uncertainty score0.391

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant DiseaseSame topicYeasts and Rust Fungi StudiesFrench-language works237,207