Italians Swindled to New York: False Promises at the Dawn of Immigration
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
As Italian authorities on migration studies Lorenzo Prencipe and Matteo Sanfilippo have recently remarked, the history of early Italian migrations to the Americas in the 1870s and 1880s is still a largely uncharted territory (Studi emigrazione. 2019. “Per una storia dell'emigrazione italiana ai tempi di Scalabrini,” LVI:355–79). Thus, this book is a particularly welcome addition to the literature. Tucciarone, an illustrator and the author of astronomical animations that have appeared in dozens of TV documentaries, and Lariccia, a retired teacher and writer, are regular contributors to La Gazzetta Italiana. Their previous book, Coal War in the Mahoning Valley: The Origins of Greater Youngstown's Italians (2019), laid the groundwork for this one. While researching, they came across a series of frauds committed against thousands of Italians in the waning months of 1872 and into the following year. The “swindle” referred to in the title concerns nearly three thousand Italians who entered New York between November 1872 and January 1873 who were defrauded through the fabrications of freelance speculators, ticket brokers, and aggressive steamship lines. Also to blame are the administrative failures of the Italian and American governments, local and national, which were not to be remedied for another quarter of a century (see Sebastiano Marco Cicciò, Il porto di imbarco di Messina: L'ispettorato e i servizi di emigrazione [1904–1929]; rev. in Italian Americana 2017, 35n2:248–52). Long neglected, this story is now rescued from oblivion thanks to painstaking research conducted mostly on obscure and forgotten contemporary local newspapers on both sides of the ocean.Tucciarone and Lariccia present a succinct “Prelude” to the main story through a quick overview of the push (privatization of commons and other feudal properties, heavy taxation, and overpopulation) and pull (the attraction exerted by booming U.S. cities) factors that help explain mass migrations across the Atlantic. The second chapter, comprising almost half the book, provides great detail about the swindle, its perpetrators, and its victims. The latter include about 280 peasants from Campania and Basilicata who in 1872, after being persuaded by unscrupulous shipping dealers from Naples and Turin to leave for Buenos Aires where they had been assured gainful employment in a land of milk and honey, found themselves utterly stranded in New York, with neither money nor assistance and the prospect of being deported due to lack of documentation. The third chapter shows how the techniques of exploitation by which the swindlers carried on their “experiments” in the 1870s were applied on a larger scale in the following decade to meet the American businesses’ desperate search for cheap labor.The rich anecdotal narrative provided by Tucciarone and Lariccia is unfortunately not matched by an adequate command of the vast literature on the larger picture of migration and of the relations between Italy and the United States in the nineteenth century. This serious limitation affects the book, whose bibliography does not exceed a dozen monographs, in terms of context and interpretations. Yet the authors are to be commended for unearthing and putting at our disposal such a treasure trove of materials, which should be further explored in a more scholarly manner.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».