MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4322728180 · doi:10.5406/2327753x.40.2.26

Italians Swindled to New York: False Promises at the Dawn of Immigration

2022· article· en· W4322728180 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ferdinando Fasce

Bibliographic record

VenueItalian Americana · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicItalian Fascism and Post-war Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNewspaperImmigrationBlameQuarter (Canadian coin)HistoryTicketEconomic historyArt historyPolitical scienceHumanitiesArtLawArchaeologyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As Italian authorities on migration studies Lorenzo Prencipe and Matteo Sanfilippo have recently remarked, the history of early Italian migrations to the Americas in the 1870s and 1880s is still a largely uncharted territory (Studi emigrazione. 2019. “Per una storia dell'emigrazione italiana ai tempi di Scalabrini,” LVI:355–79). Thus, this book is a particularly welcome addition to the literature. Tucciarone, an illustrator and the author of astronomical animations that have appeared in dozens of TV documentaries, and Lariccia, a retired teacher and writer, are regular contributors to La Gazzetta Italiana. Their previous book, Coal War in the Mahoning Valley: The Origins of Greater Youngstown's Italians (2019), laid the groundwork for this one. While researching, they came across a series of frauds committed against thousands of Italians in the waning months of 1872 and into the following year. The “swindle” referred to in the title concerns nearly three thousand Italians who entered New York between November 1872 and January 1873 who were defrauded through the fabrications of freelance speculators, ticket brokers, and aggressive steamship lines. Also to blame are the administrative failures of the Italian and American governments, local and national, which were not to be remedied for another quarter of a century (see Sebastiano Marco Cicciò, Il porto di imbarco di Messina: L'ispettorato e i servizi di emigrazione [1904–1929]; rev. in Italian Americana 2017, 35n2:248–52). Long neglected, this story is now rescued from oblivion thanks to painstaking research conducted mostly on obscure and forgotten contemporary local newspapers on both sides of the ocean.Tucciarone and Lariccia present a succinct “Prelude” to the main story through a quick overview of the push (privatization of commons and other feudal properties, heavy taxation, and overpopulation) and pull (the attraction exerted by booming U.S. cities) factors that help explain mass migrations across the Atlantic. The second chapter, comprising almost half the book, provides great detail about the swindle, its perpetrators, and its victims. The latter include about 280 peasants from Campania and Basilicata who in 1872, after being persuaded by unscrupulous shipping dealers from Naples and Turin to leave for Buenos Aires where they had been assured gainful employment in a land of milk and honey, found themselves utterly stranded in New York, with neither money nor assistance and the prospect of being deported due to lack of documentation. The third chapter shows how the techniques of exploitation by which the swindlers carried on their “experiments” in the 1870s were applied on a larger scale in the following decade to meet the American businesses’ desperate search for cheap labor.The rich anecdotal narrative provided by Tucciarone and Lariccia is unfortunately not matched by an adequate command of the vast literature on the larger picture of migration and of the relations between Italy and the United States in the nineteenth century. This serious limitation affects the book, whose bibliography does not exceed a dozen monographs, in terms of context and interpretations. Yet the authors are to be commended for unearthing and putting at our disposal such a treasure trove of materials, which should be further explored in a more scholarly manner.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.217
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0220.016
Scholarly communication0.0120.008
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0030.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueItalian AmericanaSame topicItalian Fascism and Post-war SocietyFrench-language works237,207