MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4322775281 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-p6-10-13

Abstract P6-10-13: An update to a Phase I trial of CFI-402257, an oral TTK inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors with HER2-negative breast cancer expansion cohorts

2023· article· en· W4322775281 sur OpenAlexaff
John Hilton, Daniel J. Renouf, David W. Cescon, Aaron R. Hansen, Alibiruni Abdul Razak, Lee-Anne Stayner, Trisha A. Denny, Emily Roberts-Thomson, Dih-Yih Chen, Mark Bray, Philippe L. Bédard

Notice bibliographique

RevueCancer Research · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueCancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Établissements canadiensPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreBC Cancer AgencyOttawa Hospital
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineTolerabilityBreast cancerCancerInternal medicineOncologyResponse Evaluation Criteria in Solid TumorsDiscontinuationFulvestrantProgressive diseaseChemotherapyAdverse effectEstrogen receptor

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background: TTK (also known as MPS1), a dual-specificity serine-threonine kinase, is critical for the spindle assembly checkpoint, chromosome alignment, and error correction in mitosis. Inhibition of TTK causes premature mitotic exit with unattached chromosomes, to result in chromosomal missegregation, aneuploidy, and cell death. CFI-402257 is a potent and highly selective inhibitor of TTK. Robust suppression of tumor growth was achieved upon oral dosing of single agent CFI-402257 in ER+/HER2- cell line and patient derived xenograft models. CFI-402257 demonstrated enhanced cytotoxicity in CDK4/6 inhibitor resistant ER+ breast cancer cell line models compared to parental cell lines, including those with RB1 loss. CFI-402257 has previously exhibited monotherapy and combination efficacy with a tolerable safety profile in ER+/Her2- Breast cancer patients in an ongoing clinical study which is updated here. Methods: This is an ongoing phase I, multi-center, dose escalation study (3+3 design) to determine the safety, tolerability, and maximum tolerated dose of CFI-402257 and to evaluate anti-tumor activity at the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). CFI-402257 was dosed once daily on a continuous schedule in 28-day cycles at a starting dose of 5 mg. Dose escalation included patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors. Dose expansion at the RP2D included pts with advanced solid tumors (Cohort A), advanced Her2-negative (ER+ or TNBC) with 1-4 prior lines of chemotherapy for metastatic disease (Cohort B), and ER+/Her2- breast cancer in combination with Fulvestrant (500 mg IM Day 1, 15 and 29 and then every 28 days) who have had prior treatment with an aromatase inhibitor in combination with a CDK4/6 inhibitor (≥ 3 months) and ≤1 prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease (Cohort C). Results: At data cutoff of May 2, 2022, 87 pts were enrolled. 86 pts (66 pts receiving monotherapy and 20 patients receiving combination therapy received ≥1 dose of study therapy and were analyzed for safety. One pt was not dosed due to elevated liver enzymes prior to first dose. The median age for mono was 61 years (range, 35-81) and for combo was 54 (range, 31-70). The median number of prior regimens mono and combo was 5 (range, 0-17; and 1-9, respectively). Tumor types in mono were breast cancer (27 pts), ovarian cancer (7 pts), GI cancer (3 pts), pancreatic cancer (3 pts), and other (30 pts). 20 breast cancer pts were enrolled in the combo. To date, 11 dose levels have been studied (range: 5 to 294 mg) in mono. There were 4 dose limiting toxicities (neutropenia >7days at 168mg/day, febrile neutropenia at 210mg/day, and neutropenia and colitis at 294mg/day, all grade 3). The RP2D of 168 mg was established. 3 pts in mono (biliary obstruction, febrile neutropenia, and pancytopenia) and 0 pts in combo discontinued study due to adverse events (AEs).Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAE’s) occurring in ≥30% of pts were fatigue (31 pts; 47%), nausea (30 pts; 46%), decreased appetite (22 pts; 33%), and diarrhea (21 pts; 32%) in mono; and nausea (11 pts; 55%) and diarrhea (7 pts; 35%) in combo. 35% of mono and 39% of combo AEs were considered related to CFI-402257 by the investigators. Grade ≥3 AEs and serious AEs were reported in 25 pts (38%) and 17 pts (26%), respectively in mono; and 5 pts (25%) and 3 pts (15%) in combo. The investigator assessed best overall response rate (partial response [PR] or better within the efficacy population) of 6% (PR; hepatocellular carcinoma n=1, breast cancer n=2 from n=47) in mono and 18% (PR; n=2 breast cancer) in combo (n=11), with additional patients still to be assessed. Conclusion: CFI-402257 is well tolerated as mono and combination with fulvestrant. Efficacy signals are emerging with pts in the combo cohort demonstrating anti-tumor activity. Additional efficacy will be updated at the time of the presentation. Citation Format: John Hilton, Daniel Renouf, David W. Cescon, Aaron Hansen, Alibiruni Abdul Razak, Lee-Anne Stayner, Trisha A. Denny, Emily Roberts-Thomson, Dih-Yih Chen, Mark Bray, Philippe Bedard. An update to a Phase I trial of CFI-402257, an oral TTK inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors with HER2-negative breast cancer expansion cohorts [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-10-13.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai non randomisé · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,005
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,017

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,025
Tête enseignante GPT0,383
Écart entre enseignants0,358 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai non randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCancer ResearchMême sujetCancer Genomics and DiagnosticsTravaux en français237 207