MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4323350794 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwac036.223

A223 UNMASKED OR INDUCED COLITIS: COULD IT BE SECUKINUMAB?

2023· article· en· W4323350794 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueMicroscopic Colitis
Établissements canadiensUniversity of British Columbia
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineSecukinumabColonoscopyGastroenterologyInflammatory bowel diseaseDiarrheaInternal medicineInfliximabAdalimumabAnkylosing spondylitisAnemiaAscending colonMicroscopic colitisCollagenous colitisColitisArthritisDiseasePsoriatic arthritisColorectal cancer

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background Spondyloarthropathies (SpA), such as Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) are inflammatory disorders which have coheritability with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Secukinumab is a monoclonal antibody inhibitor of IL-17A used to treat SpA, but has also been reported to cause de novo and exacerbations of known IBD. Rare reports of Secukinumab induced microscopic colitis have also been documented. Purpose To present and discuss the diagnostic challenges in a case of undifferentiated colitis in a patient with AS treated with Secukinumab. Method Case report and literature review. Result(s) Case Report: A 62-year-old male with a history of AS was admitted to hospital with acute on chronic diarrhea. The patient’s AS was unresponsive to Infliximab, Methotrexate, and Adalimumab, although the latter improved his diarrhea at the time. A Colonoscopy completed 14 years earlier for chronic diarrhea was endoscopically normal with biopsies of the left colon notable for mild patchy inflammation and fibrosis. A subsequent Colonoscopy with random biopsies 8 years later showed normal mucosa while he was treated with Adalimumab. He was started on Secukinumab 4 months prior to hospitalization noting progressive watery diarrhea and weight loss of 15kg. Investigations were notable for microcytic anemia (Hemoglobin 120 g/L, MCV 78 fL), elevated CRP (33 mg/L), and a creatinine of 508 µmol/L. Negative tTg antibodies and normal IgA levels ruled out celiac disease. Stool studies were unremarkable. Colonoscopy showed several linear ulcerations in the descending colon and rectum with a normal terminal ileum, transverse, and ascending colon. Biopsies from the endoscopically normal mucosa showed thickened subepithelial collagen band suggestive of microscopic colitis while the ulcerated regions showed cryptic rupture with associated granuloma representing possible Crohn’s colitis versus drug-induced injury. Stains were negative for CMV. Secukinumab was stopped and he was started on Budesonide with significant improvement in symptoms. Literature Review Almost half of all patients with SpA have microscopic intestinal inflammation and of these, 7% eventually develop IBD. Shorter symptom duration, higher SpA activity and male sex are known risk factors for underlying intestinal involvement. However, the exact role of microscopic intestinal inflammation in SpA has yet to be determined. Secukinumab is an inhibitor of IL-17A with significant efficacy in the treatment of SpA but has been associated with exacerbations of Crohn’s disease and de novo cases of IBD. Thus, the role of IL-17 in IBD remains uncertain and may suggest a protective effect rather than an inflammatory one seen in SpA. The long half-life of Secukinumab (24-31 days) presents challenges when considering treatment with other biologics, such as anti-TNFs, which may cause excessive immunosuppression. Image Conclusion(s) New onset colitis is a described but rare entity in patients treated with Secukinumab presenting several diagnostic and treatment challenges. Please acknowledge all funding agencies by checking the applicable boxes below None Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,616
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,027
Tête enseignante GPT0,288
Écart entre enseignants0,262 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle