MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323350794 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwac036.223

A223 UNMASKED OR INDUCED COLITIS: COULD IT BE SECUKINUMAB?

2023· article· en· W4323350794 on OpenAlexaff
S Nassiri, G Ou

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMicroscopic Colitis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSecukinumabColonoscopyGastroenterologyInflammatory bowel diseaseDiarrheaInternal medicineInfliximabAdalimumabAnkylosing spondylitisAnemiaAscending colonMicroscopic colitisCollagenous colitisColitisArthritisDiseasePsoriatic arthritisColorectal cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Spondyloarthropathies (SpA), such as Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) are inflammatory disorders which have coheritability with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Secukinumab is a monoclonal antibody inhibitor of IL-17A used to treat SpA, but has also been reported to cause de novo and exacerbations of known IBD. Rare reports of Secukinumab induced microscopic colitis have also been documented. Purpose To present and discuss the diagnostic challenges in a case of undifferentiated colitis in a patient with AS treated with Secukinumab. Method Case report and literature review. Result(s) Case Report: A 62-year-old male with a history of AS was admitted to hospital with acute on chronic diarrhea. The patient’s AS was unresponsive to Infliximab, Methotrexate, and Adalimumab, although the latter improved his diarrhea at the time. A Colonoscopy completed 14 years earlier for chronic diarrhea was endoscopically normal with biopsies of the left colon notable for mild patchy inflammation and fibrosis. A subsequent Colonoscopy with random biopsies 8 years later showed normal mucosa while he was treated with Adalimumab. He was started on Secukinumab 4 months prior to hospitalization noting progressive watery diarrhea and weight loss of 15kg. Investigations were notable for microcytic anemia (Hemoglobin 120 g/L, MCV 78 fL), elevated CRP (33 mg/L), and a creatinine of 508 µmol/L. Negative tTg antibodies and normal IgA levels ruled out celiac disease. Stool studies were unremarkable. Colonoscopy showed several linear ulcerations in the descending colon and rectum with a normal terminal ileum, transverse, and ascending colon. Biopsies from the endoscopically normal mucosa showed thickened subepithelial collagen band suggestive of microscopic colitis while the ulcerated regions showed cryptic rupture with associated granuloma representing possible Crohn’s colitis versus drug-induced injury. Stains were negative for CMV. Secukinumab was stopped and he was started on Budesonide with significant improvement in symptoms. Literature Review Almost half of all patients with SpA have microscopic intestinal inflammation and of these, 7% eventually develop IBD. Shorter symptom duration, higher SpA activity and male sex are known risk factors for underlying intestinal involvement. However, the exact role of microscopic intestinal inflammation in SpA has yet to be determined. Secukinumab is an inhibitor of IL-17A with significant efficacy in the treatment of SpA but has been associated with exacerbations of Crohn’s disease and de novo cases of IBD. Thus, the role of IL-17 in IBD remains uncertain and may suggest a protective effect rather than an inflammatory one seen in SpA. The long half-life of Secukinumab (24-31 days) presents challenges when considering treatment with other biologics, such as anti-TNFs, which may cause excessive immunosuppression. Image Conclusion(s) New onset colitis is a described but rare entity in patients treated with Secukinumab presenting several diagnostic and treatment challenges. Please acknowledge all funding agencies by checking the applicable boxes below None Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicMicroscopic ColitisFrench-language works237,207