A16 UNMET HEALTHCARE NEEDS AMONG PEOPLE WITH INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE: A NATIONAL CROSS-SECTIONAL POPULATION-REPRESENTATIVE STUDY
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic inflammatory disease primarily affecting the gastrointestinal tract. Despite treatment with the current standards of care, many IBD patients experience relapsing, remitting, and disabling bowel symptoms and significant disease complications. Ensuring patients have adequate access to high quality multidisciplinary healthcare is vital for the short- and long-term wellbeing of IBD patients. Purpose (1) Compare unmet healthcare needs of people with and without IBD. (2) Determine whether accessing regular medical care mediates the association between IBD and unmet healthcare needs. (3) Describe the reasons for unmet healthcare needs among people with and without IBD. Method We used the 2014 Canadian Community Health Survey, a population-representative national cross-sectional survey conducted by Statistics Canada. Respondents with a non-IBD bowel disorder or aged 18 or younger were excluded. Survey weights were used for descriptive statistics. We used multilevel logistic regression to compare perceived unmet healthcare needs among individuals with and without IBD, clustering by health region and controlling for age, immigration status, race, home ownership, marital status, annual household income, education level, and number of chronic conditions (0, 1, 2+). In a second model, we additionally controlled for having a regular family doctor, having consulted a specialist, and having consulted a psychologist to assess if regularly accessing medical care mediated the association between IBD and unmet healthcare needs. Individuals reporting unmet healthcare needs were asked about the reasons for their unmet healthcare needs. Responses are summarized with weighted percentages, plotted in a bar graph. Result(s) Among the 690 IBD and 62,832 non-IBD eligible survey respondents, 16.7% of people with IBD had an unmet healthcare need within the past 12 months, compared with 10.3% of those without IBD (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.74). Additionally adjusting for regular access to medical care slightly attenuated the association between IBD and unmet healthcare needs (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.62). Reasons for unmet healthcare needs differed among those with and without IBD (Figure). Specifically, doctors believing that care was unnecessary and the cost of care were more likely to be the reason people with IBD had an unmet healthcare need. Image Conclusion(s) People with IBD are more likely to have an unmet healthcare need that was partially mediated by access to healthcare professionals. Our work highlights the need for further research into the types of unmet healthcare needs experienced by people living with IBD. This underscores the need for multidisciplinary healthcare teams to address the increased burden of unmet healthcare needs in the IBD population. Please acknowledge all funding agencies by checking the applicable boxes below None Disclosure of Interest G. Postill: None Declared, E. Benchimol Consultant of: Hoffman La-Roche Limited and Peabody & Arnold LLP for matters unrelated to medications used to treat inflammatory bowel disease. Dr. Benchimol has also acted as a consultant for McKesson Canada and the Dairy Farmers of Ontario for matters unrelated to medications used to treat inflammatory bowel disease., J. Im: None Declared, A. Tang: None Declared, E. Kuenzig: None Declared
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».