A16 UNMET HEALTHCARE NEEDS AMONG PEOPLE WITH INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE: A NATIONAL CROSS-SECTIONAL POPULATION-REPRESENTATIVE STUDY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic inflammatory disease primarily affecting the gastrointestinal tract. Despite treatment with the current standards of care, many IBD patients experience relapsing, remitting, and disabling bowel symptoms and significant disease complications. Ensuring patients have adequate access to high quality multidisciplinary healthcare is vital for the short- and long-term wellbeing of IBD patients. Purpose (1) Compare unmet healthcare needs of people with and without IBD. (2) Determine whether accessing regular medical care mediates the association between IBD and unmet healthcare needs. (3) Describe the reasons for unmet healthcare needs among people with and without IBD. Method We used the 2014 Canadian Community Health Survey, a population-representative national cross-sectional survey conducted by Statistics Canada. Respondents with a non-IBD bowel disorder or aged 18 or younger were excluded. Survey weights were used for descriptive statistics. We used multilevel logistic regression to compare perceived unmet healthcare needs among individuals with and without IBD, clustering by health region and controlling for age, immigration status, race, home ownership, marital status, annual household income, education level, and number of chronic conditions (0, 1, 2+). In a second model, we additionally controlled for having a regular family doctor, having consulted a specialist, and having consulted a psychologist to assess if regularly accessing medical care mediated the association between IBD and unmet healthcare needs. Individuals reporting unmet healthcare needs were asked about the reasons for their unmet healthcare needs. Responses are summarized with weighted percentages, plotted in a bar graph. Result(s) Among the 690 IBD and 62,832 non-IBD eligible survey respondents, 16.7% of people with IBD had an unmet healthcare need within the past 12 months, compared with 10.3% of those without IBD (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.74). Additionally adjusting for regular access to medical care slightly attenuated the association between IBD and unmet healthcare needs (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.62). Reasons for unmet healthcare needs differed among those with and without IBD (Figure). Specifically, doctors believing that care was unnecessary and the cost of care were more likely to be the reason people with IBD had an unmet healthcare need. Image Conclusion(s) People with IBD are more likely to have an unmet healthcare need that was partially mediated by access to healthcare professionals. Our work highlights the need for further research into the types of unmet healthcare needs experienced by people living with IBD. This underscores the need for multidisciplinary healthcare teams to address the increased burden of unmet healthcare needs in the IBD population. Please acknowledge all funding agencies by checking the applicable boxes below None Disclosure of Interest G. Postill: None Declared, E. Benchimol Consultant of: Hoffman La-Roche Limited and Peabody & Arnold LLP for matters unrelated to medications used to treat inflammatory bowel disease. Dr. Benchimol has also acted as a consultant for McKesson Canada and the Dairy Farmers of Ontario for matters unrelated to medications used to treat inflammatory bowel disease., J. Im: None Declared, A. Tang: None Declared, E. Kuenzig: None Declared
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".