Across Global Souths: Asian Migrations through the U.S. South and the Circum-Caribbean
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Across Global Souths:Asian Migrations through the U.S. South and the Circum-Caribbean Joo Ok Kim (bio) and Giselle Liza Anatol (bio) A Special Issue of the American Studies Journal Across Global Souths: Asian Migrations through the U.S. South and the Circum-Caribbean investigates Asian/American cultures, politics, and relationships across multiple Souths, with an emphasis on the U.S. South and the Caribbean. Edward Said's foundational Orientalism (1978) has been expanded and extrapolated to multiple frameworks that situate Asian peoples and populations in terms of the East versus the West; this concept continues to circulate in the United States, where "Asian America" is largely envisioned as only populating the East and West coasts. The Across Global Souths project reframes the conversation with an emphasis on journeys to and from multiple Souths. The guest editors consider the broader geopolitical designation of "South" in the United States, including Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, Tennessee, and Texas, and the U.S. Gulf Coast as a region in and of itself. Asian Americans in Dixie provides a critical reference point, defining the South as "a region of the United States and a space connected to and part of other transnational spaces" (Joshi and Desai, 2013, 4). Grounded within recent scholarly developments in the field of American Studies, we have invited further reflections on the diasporic condition of the category "Asian," as well as the diasporic condition of the category "Southerner," simultaneously challenging notions of an exclusively white, Euro-American U.S. [End Page 7] citizenry. A more inclusive, diverse conceptualization of what it means to be "American" subverts common racial identifications, which frequently fail to address the critical role that adopted cultural and ethnic traditions have played in the development of the U.S. national landscape; it also undermines notions of an unchanging, fixed identity. Furthermore, "American" is used expansively to consider migrations to and from different locations across the Americas. Framed this way, Brazil—the home to the largest population of Japanese people outside of Japan—and Cuba's Havana Chinatown emerge as rich sites for exploration. What distinguishes this special issue, firmly ensconced within both American Studies and current Global South frameworks, is the comparative focus on Asians in the U.S. South and the Caribbean and Caribbean diasporas. Although Global South Studies has raised important questions on "south/south" and hemispheric discourses, and Caribbean Studies has long foregrounded archipelagic and transnational critiques of colonialism, an interdisciplinary examination of Asian migrations within two locations that share centuries of overlapping histories has been understudied. For instance, the troubling "John Chinaman" stereotype of the nineteenth century, which depicted Chinese immigrants to the United States, Canada, the Caribbean, and Australia as "sinister, crafty, dirty, diseased, inscrutable, economically threatening, and, of course, strangely inassimilable," is commonly framed as "widespread in the West" (Lee Loy 1, 2010, emphasis added), resulting from migratory routes that traversed longitudinal, rather than latitudinal, lines. But even as we, the editors and contributors to Across Global Souths, foreground the geographical spaces of the U.S. South and the Caribbean in this special issue, we are inspired by broader theorizations of "south" that assemble other underexamined geographies and a range of methodologies, such as ethnographies that allow inquiry within unexpected sites of cultural formations, like restaurants, motels, and fishing-folk circles. This project thus convenes scholars working "across" different fields, disciplinary approaches, and research methods to foster greater understanding of the U.S. South–circum-Caribbean network. We feel compelled by stories like that of writer Cristina García, whose novel Monkey Hunting (2003) was partially inspired by a visit to a Chinese Cuban restaurant on the Upper West Side of Manhattan and a plate of black beans and pork fried rice. The novel's publication and circulation animate histories of Asian migration to the Americas, and it implicitly critiques the loss of these histories; it also illuminates the scores of lost narratives about North–South crossings, including recipes, and patterns of movement engendered by the Vietnam War. In other words, even as it activates chronicles of the "coolie" trade, García's narrative engages texts that conventionally have been elided from constructions of historical archives (e.g., family...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,017 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».