MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4362467381 · doi:10.3389/fsufs.2023.1179222

Editorial: Plant growth-promoting microorganisms for sustainable agricultural production, volume II

2023· editorial· en· W4362467381 sur OpenAlexaff
Everlon Cid Rigobelo, Saveetha Kandasamy, Duraisamy Saravanakumar

Notice bibliographique

RevueFrontiers in Sustainable Food Systems · 2023
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiquePlant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
Établissements canadiensA&L Canada Laboratories (Canada)
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSustainabilityCrop productionVolume (thermodynamics)AgricultureSustainable agricultureProduction (economics)CropPlant productionAgricultural productivitySustainable productionEnvironmental scienceAgricultural economicsAgricultural scienceBiologyAgronomyEcologyEconomicsPhysics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria are a group of bacteria that are initially rhizospheric; some colonize the plant surface (phyllospheric), and some colonize the plant tissue (endophytic) with several abilities related to plant growth. These abilities are classified as direct when their effect acts on the plant directly or indirect when their effect acts on the pathogen that attacks the plant. Direct effects on plants are the ability to fix atmospheric nitrogen. Some bacteria have an enzyme named nitrogenase that can transform atmospheric nitrogen into ammonia, making it available for plants and microorganisms.Another direct ability that acts on the plant directly is the ability to solubilize phosphorus. Usually, there is a significant amount of phosphorus in the soil, but it is unavailable because phosphorus is adsorbed in the clay. The microorganisms that can solubilize phosphorus produce enzymes such as phytase or phosphatase or organic acids that solubilize phosphorus, making it available for plants and other microorganisms. Some microorganisms can produce phytohormones, usually indole 3 acetic acid. This phytohormone promotes root development, increasing its efficiency in exploring the soil and its capacity to absorb nutrients and water. It also makes the plant more tolerant to abiotic stress, especially drought. In addition, the phytohormone promotes areal development and increases the chlorophyll content in the leaves. This action promotes an increase in photosynthesis efficiency. Some microorganisms induce plant growth indirectly. Several microorganisms contain molecules named elicitors. Plants recognize these elicitors, promoting the expression of many genes related to defense mechanisms. This phenomenon is called induced systemic resistance; the plant stays in a state of defense, becoming more resistant to several diseases. Another indirect effect on the plant that promotes plant growth is the capacity of some microorganisms to kill phytopathogenic microorganisms. Some beneficial microorganisms can use some nutrients more efficiently as iron than others, killing these microorganisms for competition. Another strategy is competition for a colonization niche where the beneficial microorganisms colonize the place first, and then pathogenic microbes damage their colonization.As described, there are many abilities that beneficial microbes of plant growth-promoting microorganisms can promote plant growth, and these microorganisms can be used in crop production as an excellent strategy to face many challenges in the current scenario. As these microorganisms can promote root development, they can be used to reduce the amount of chemical fertilizers. As these microorganisms can reduce the phytopathogenic microbes and promote induced systemic resistance in the plant, they can be used to reduce the amount of fungicides and pesticides.Many biotic and abiotic factors influence the efficiency of the mode of action of these beneficial microorganisms on the plant. The challenge is now to improve our understanding of these microorganisms and use them better. Many factors related to plant-microbemicrobe interactions need to be improved. Nevertheless, there are many possibilities to use these microorganisms to improve crop production, reducing production costs and environmental impact without reducing productivity.In this research topic, four studies demonstrated the potential use of microorganisms.Betran-Medina et al. reported the potential of a Rhizobium strain in a nonlegume crop to improve P management.Gaspar et al. showed a new composter, and the addition of inoculants contributed significantly to the efficiency of the process of composting organic waste. Gaspar et al. showed that the yeasts Pichia kudriavzevii, Pichia farinosa, and Issatchenkia orientalis and the filamentous fungi of the genus Aspergillus spp. proven to have high biotechnological value and could be used as starter cultures to accelerate the composting process.Volkogon et al. showed that presowing seed inoculation had no significant effect on the vertical migration of nutrients in the soil on the background of cattle manure due to the highly competitive environment created by introducing microorganisms from organic fertilizer, preventing the establishment of close interactions between PGPR and plants.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies, Intégrité de la recherche
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,121
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,005
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,007
Tête enseignante GPT0,200
Écart entre enseignants0,192 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueFrontiers in Sustainable Food SystemsMême sujetPlant-Microbe Interactions and ImmunityTravaux en français237 207