MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4362467381 · doi:10.3389/fsufs.2023.1179222

Editorial: Plant growth-promoting microorganisms for sustainable agricultural production, volume II

2023· editorial· en· W4362467381 on OpenAlexaff
Everlon Cid Rigobelo, Saveetha Kandasamy, Duraisamy Saravanakumar

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Sustainable Food Systems · 2023
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
Canadian institutionsA&L Canada Laboratories (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSustainabilityCrop productionVolume (thermodynamics)AgricultureSustainable agricultureProduction (economics)CropPlant productionAgricultural productivitySustainable productionEnvironmental scienceAgricultural economicsAgricultural scienceBiologyAgronomyEcologyEconomicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria are a group of bacteria that are initially rhizospheric; some colonize the plant surface (phyllospheric), and some colonize the plant tissue (endophytic) with several abilities related to plant growth. These abilities are classified as direct when their effect acts on the plant directly or indirect when their effect acts on the pathogen that attacks the plant. Direct effects on plants are the ability to fix atmospheric nitrogen. Some bacteria have an enzyme named nitrogenase that can transform atmospheric nitrogen into ammonia, making it available for plants and microorganisms.Another direct ability that acts on the plant directly is the ability to solubilize phosphorus. Usually, there is a significant amount of phosphorus in the soil, but it is unavailable because phosphorus is adsorbed in the clay. The microorganisms that can solubilize phosphorus produce enzymes such as phytase or phosphatase or organic acids that solubilize phosphorus, making it available for plants and other microorganisms. Some microorganisms can produce phytohormones, usually indole 3 acetic acid. This phytohormone promotes root development, increasing its efficiency in exploring the soil and its capacity to absorb nutrients and water. It also makes the plant more tolerant to abiotic stress, especially drought. In addition, the phytohormone promotes areal development and increases the chlorophyll content in the leaves. This action promotes an increase in photosynthesis efficiency. Some microorganisms induce plant growth indirectly. Several microorganisms contain molecules named elicitors. Plants recognize these elicitors, promoting the expression of many genes related to defense mechanisms. This phenomenon is called induced systemic resistance; the plant stays in a state of defense, becoming more resistant to several diseases. Another indirect effect on the plant that promotes plant growth is the capacity of some microorganisms to kill phytopathogenic microorganisms. Some beneficial microorganisms can use some nutrients more efficiently as iron than others, killing these microorganisms for competition. Another strategy is competition for a colonization niche where the beneficial microorganisms colonize the place first, and then pathogenic microbes damage their colonization.As described, there are many abilities that beneficial microbes of plant growth-promoting microorganisms can promote plant growth, and these microorganisms can be used in crop production as an excellent strategy to face many challenges in the current scenario. As these microorganisms can promote root development, they can be used to reduce the amount of chemical fertilizers. As these microorganisms can reduce the phytopathogenic microbes and promote induced systemic resistance in the plant, they can be used to reduce the amount of fungicides and pesticides.Many biotic and abiotic factors influence the efficiency of the mode of action of these beneficial microorganisms on the plant. The challenge is now to improve our understanding of these microorganisms and use them better. Many factors related to plant-microbemicrobe interactions need to be improved. Nevertheless, there are many possibilities to use these microorganisms to improve crop production, reducing production costs and environmental impact without reducing productivity.In this research topic, four studies demonstrated the potential use of microorganisms.Betran-Medina et al. reported the potential of a Rhizobium strain in a nonlegume crop to improve P management.Gaspar et al. showed a new composter, and the addition of inoculants contributed significantly to the efficiency of the process of composting organic waste. Gaspar et al. showed that the yeasts Pichia kudriavzevii, Pichia farinosa, and Issatchenkia orientalis and the filamentous fungi of the genus Aspergillus spp. proven to have high biotechnological value and could be used as starter cultures to accelerate the composting process.Volkogon et al. showed that presowing seed inoculation had no significant effect on the vertical migration of nutrients in the soil on the background of cattle manure due to the highly competitive environment created by introducing microorganisms from organic fertilizer, preventing the establishment of close interactions between PGPR and plants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.121
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Sustainable Food SystemsSame topicPlant-Microbe Interactions and ImmunityFrench-language works237,207