MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4362510785 · doi:10.1353/ohq.2023.0011

The York Factory Express: Fort Vancouver To Hudson Bay, 1826–1849 by Nancy Marguerite Anderson

2023· article· en· W4362510785 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kenneth Favrholdt

Notice bibliographique

RevueOregon Historical Quarterly · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Identity and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBayGeorge (robot)HistoryArt historyFactory (object-oriented programming)ScotsIndex (typography)NarrativeArchaeologyArt

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The York Factory Express: Fort Vancouver To Hudson Bay, 1826–1849 by Nancy Marguerite Anderson Kenneth Favrholdt THE YORK FACTORY EXPRESS: FORT VANCOUVER TO HUDSON BAY, 1826–1849 by Nancy Marguerite Anderson Ronsdale Press, Vancouver, B.C., 2020. Illustrations, maps, notes, bibliography, index. 300 pages. $24.95, paper. The York Factory Express is British Columbian author Nancy Marguerite Anderson’s second book. She writes from her family connection to the fur trade history of the West, a story that extended across the 49th parallel before the U.S.-Canada boundary was established. Anderson recounts many of the stories penned by the Hudson’s Bay Company’s “gentlemen” traders, clerks, and administrators, usually Scots, and laments the absence of the narratives of the Canadiens, Iroquois, and their mixed-blood descendants, whose job it was to power every mile of these monumental journeys, between 1826 and 1854. Anderson’s account covers up to 1849. The author has woven a detailed tapestry of geography that spans half the continent from Fort Vancouver (now Vancouver, Washington) to York Factory on Hudson Bay (present Manitoba, Canada), a distance of roughly 2,400 miles, the express averaging fifty to sixty days outbound and inbound. Varied were the number of boats (three to five) and men (upwards of forty to seventy-five). The work is rich with description about the route, interspersed with passages from the relevant journals and diaries of such gentlemen as John McLeod (1826), Aemilius Simpson (1826), Edward Ermatinger (1827–1828), James Douglas (1835), George Traill Allan (1841), and Thomas Lowe (1847–1848) — all Scots — except for métis John Charles (1849). The book takes readers traveling as the voyageurs did, down dangerous rapids, through swamps, and across arduous portages, including Athabasca Pass through the Rocky Mountains. Although Anderson uses the gentlemen’s journals to provide the description of the trips, it is the virtually nameless voyageurs whose exertions move the story along. Anderson touches on every aspect of the express voyages, describing the food of the voyageurs, the songs they sang, passengers including women and children, conveyances such as “cassettes” that held journals and correspondence, canoes and horses as well as tracking the clinker-built twenty-eight-foot-long York boats used by the Saskatchewan brigades. No furs or trade goods in bulk were transported on these trips. Halfway through the book, Anderson describes the return trip, known then as the Columbia Express. She mentions six of the gentlemen — Ermatinger, Allan, Douglas, Simpson, Lowe, and Charles — who recount the journey back to Fort Vancouver. There were many new and inexperienced men on this inbound voyage, largely Canadiens and métis, and Orkney men who originally came to York Factory on ships from London. The excellent maps by cartographer Eric Leinberger, however, do not show all the places along the express route, so it is easy for armchair travelers to get lost. The essential ninety-mile Athabasca Portage between Fort Assiniboine and Edmonton House, which Anderson mentions, is not shown on the relevant maps. An appendix of all the placenames along the route would have been useful. There are twenty-eight pages of comprehensive notes, a list of general works consulted, and an index. Many photographs and drawings illustrate the [End Page 107] difficult biannual trip each way. There are some typos in this edition, along with the omitted figure numbers to the eleven maps. A general complaint is that Anderson uses the recent Canadian term “First Nations” with reference to Indigenous people both north and south of the present border. It would have been appropriate to use the actual names of the Indigenous groups where possible. While we do not know many names of the voyageurs, whose tradition was oral, the book’s epilogue is an homage to the “invisible” voyageurs. Anderson concludes by stating: “This was a huge accomplishment and was largely due to the character of the Canadien and Iroquois men who rowed the boats in the early years, and the Métis and First Nations men who later replaced them” (p. 252). The book is a labor of love, which Anderson attributes to her personal connection to the fur traders — her great-grandfather Alexander Caulfield Anderson and her...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,600
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,015
Tête enseignante GPT0,230
Écart entre enseignants0,215 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueOregon Historical QuarterlyMême sujetCanadian Identity and HistoryTravaux en français237 207