MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4362510785 · doi:10.1353/ohq.2023.0011

The York Factory Express: Fort Vancouver To Hudson Bay, 1826–1849 by Nancy Marguerite Anderson

2023· article· en· W4362510785 on OpenAlex
Kenneth Favrholdt

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOregon Historical Quarterly · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBayGeorge (robot)HistoryArt historyFactory (object-oriented programming)ScotsIndex (typography)NarrativeArchaeologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The York Factory Express: Fort Vancouver To Hudson Bay, 1826–1849 by Nancy Marguerite Anderson Kenneth Favrholdt THE YORK FACTORY EXPRESS: FORT VANCOUVER TO HUDSON BAY, 1826–1849 by Nancy Marguerite Anderson Ronsdale Press, Vancouver, B.C., 2020. Illustrations, maps, notes, bibliography, index. 300 pages. $24.95, paper. The York Factory Express is British Columbian author Nancy Marguerite Anderson’s second book. She writes from her family connection to the fur trade history of the West, a story that extended across the 49th parallel before the U.S.-Canada boundary was established. Anderson recounts many of the stories penned by the Hudson’s Bay Company’s “gentlemen” traders, clerks, and administrators, usually Scots, and laments the absence of the narratives of the Canadiens, Iroquois, and their mixed-blood descendants, whose job it was to power every mile of these monumental journeys, between 1826 and 1854. Anderson’s account covers up to 1849. The author has woven a detailed tapestry of geography that spans half the continent from Fort Vancouver (now Vancouver, Washington) to York Factory on Hudson Bay (present Manitoba, Canada), a distance of roughly 2,400 miles, the express averaging fifty to sixty days outbound and inbound. Varied were the number of boats (three to five) and men (upwards of forty to seventy-five). The work is rich with description about the route, interspersed with passages from the relevant journals and diaries of such gentlemen as John McLeod (1826), Aemilius Simpson (1826), Edward Ermatinger (1827–1828), James Douglas (1835), George Traill Allan (1841), and Thomas Lowe (1847–1848) — all Scots — except for métis John Charles (1849). The book takes readers traveling as the voyageurs did, down dangerous rapids, through swamps, and across arduous portages, including Athabasca Pass through the Rocky Mountains. Although Anderson uses the gentlemen’s journals to provide the description of the trips, it is the virtually nameless voyageurs whose exertions move the story along. Anderson touches on every aspect of the express voyages, describing the food of the voyageurs, the songs they sang, passengers including women and children, conveyances such as “cassettes” that held journals and correspondence, canoes and horses as well as tracking the clinker-built twenty-eight-foot-long York boats used by the Saskatchewan brigades. No furs or trade goods in bulk were transported on these trips. Halfway through the book, Anderson describes the return trip, known then as the Columbia Express. She mentions six of the gentlemen — Ermatinger, Allan, Douglas, Simpson, Lowe, and Charles — who recount the journey back to Fort Vancouver. There were many new and inexperienced men on this inbound voyage, largely Canadiens and métis, and Orkney men who originally came to York Factory on ships from London. The excellent maps by cartographer Eric Leinberger, however, do not show all the places along the express route, so it is easy for armchair travelers to get lost. The essential ninety-mile Athabasca Portage between Fort Assiniboine and Edmonton House, which Anderson mentions, is not shown on the relevant maps. An appendix of all the placenames along the route would have been useful. There are twenty-eight pages of comprehensive notes, a list of general works consulted, and an index. Many photographs and drawings illustrate the [End Page 107] difficult biannual trip each way. There are some typos in this edition, along with the omitted figure numbers to the eleven maps. A general complaint is that Anderson uses the recent Canadian term “First Nations” with reference to Indigenous people both north and south of the present border. It would have been appropriate to use the actual names of the Indigenous groups where possible. While we do not know many names of the voyageurs, whose tradition was oral, the book’s epilogue is an homage to the “invisible” voyageurs. Anderson concludes by stating: “This was a huge accomplishment and was largely due to the character of the Canadien and Iroquois men who rowed the boats in the early years, and the Métis and First Nations men who later replaced them” (p. 252). The book is a labor of love, which Anderson attributes to her personal connection to the fur traders — her great-grandfather Alexander Caulfield Anderson and her...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.600
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it