Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: South African Cinema 1896–2010 by Martin Botha's Anna-Marie Jansen van Vuuren (bio) Martin Botha's South African Cinema 1896–2010 Bristol: Intellect Books, 2012 Within South African Cinema 1896–2010, Martin P. Botha outlines the historical periods, movies, and filmmakers whose names graced the end credits of South African films throughout more than a century. The book consists of twelve chapters, ranging from the advent of the industry in 1895 (chapter 1) to "themes and aesthetics of post-Apartheid cinema" (chapter 12). Though Botha's latest publication follows in the footsteps of earlier books such as Keyan Tomaselli's The Cinema of Apartheid (1989, Routledge) and Encountering Modernity: Twentieth Century South African Cinema (2006, Rozenberg Publishers) and Jacqueline Maingard's South African National Cinema (2007, Routledge), it differs substantially from the approaches followed by Tomaselli and Maingard. Similarly to Maingard, Botha discusses the different time periods of South African cinema within separate chapters. However, he is more descriptive and less prescriptive than Maingard, giving readers the opportunity to make up their own minds about aspects of it. Yet, I would propose that an instructor or professor of film history or African studies use these latter two sources in tandem, because while I found Botha's chapter "B Scheme Films" somewhat short and disappointing, in a university or college curriculum one could easily combine it with readings from sections of Maingard's chapters that deal comprehensively with the subject. Similarly, Botha's first chapter, "Early South African Cinema: 1895–1948," should be combined with readings from Thelma Gutsche's authoritative The History and Social Significance of Motion Pictures in South Africa, 1895–1940 (1972, Howard Timmins) and the recently published Black and White Bioscope: Making Movies in Africa: 1899 to 1925, by Neil Parsons (2018, Intellect Books). I argue that therein lies one of the strengths of Botha's publication: he knows and understands the oeuvre and does not seek to redo or rewrite the work of those scholars who came before him. Instead he opts to focus on his field of speciality, namely auteur studies. No stranger to historical accounts of his native country's film industry, Botha has written and edited several books on the topic. This includes 1992's Images of South Africa: The Rise of the Alternative Film (with Adri van [End Page 256] Aswegen, Human Sciences Research Council of South Africa) and Movies, Moguls, Mavericks: South African Cinema, 1979–1991 (edited by Johan Blignaut and Botha, Showdata) as well as the 2007 anthology, Marginal Lives and Painful Pasts: South African Cinema After Apartheid (Genugtig!). Botha continued this preference of auteur studies with books devoted to Manie van Rensburg (with Hubert Dethier, 1997, Vubpress) and Jans Rautenbach (2006, Genugtig!). Since these books were published in Dutch and Afrikaans respectively, one can understand why he aimed to summarize some of the content from the latter two publications in this book's chapter 4 and 5. In his own words Botha writes in the introduction of South African Cinema 1896–2010 that with this publication he aimed to spotlight the oeuvres of significant directors that Maingard as well as Isabel Balseiro and Ntongela Masilela (To Change Reels: Film and Film Culture in South Africa; 2003, Wayne State University Press) ignored. Therefore, apart from his chapters on Rautenbach and Van Rensburg, he focuses on South African directors of the 1980s and honors Ross Devenish with a chapter discussing this director's oeuvre in terms of themes and aesthetics. South African Cinema 1896–2010's seemingly objective title (without a subtitle indicating a specific focus) suggests an attempt by Botha to steer away from clear slant in terms of paradigm or ideology and to give an unbiased (if one can divorce oneself from history), descriptive account of films produced both within South Africa and by South Africans in exile. Botha's approach reminds me of Robert Ross's A Concise History of South Africa (1999, Cambridge University Press), which provides a short history of the country for university readers and general interest readers. Precisely therein lies the distinguishing factor of Botha's recent publication: he synthesizes the history of the country's film industry in a...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».