MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4365807574 · doi:10.2979/blackcamera.11.2.12

Martin Botha, South African Cinema 1896-2010

2020· article· en· W4365807574 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Anna-Marie Jansen van Vuuren

Bibliographic record

VenueBlack Camera · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAfrican history and culture studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMovie theaterSubject (documents)Art historyModernityArtHistoryMedia studiesSociologyPolitical scienceLawLibrary science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: South African Cinema 1896–2010 by Martin Botha's Anna-Marie Jansen van Vuuren (bio) Martin Botha's South African Cinema 1896–2010 Bristol: Intellect Books, 2012 Within South African Cinema 1896–2010, Martin P. Botha outlines the historical periods, movies, and filmmakers whose names graced the end credits of South African films throughout more than a century. The book consists of twelve chapters, ranging from the advent of the industry in 1895 (chapter 1) to "themes and aesthetics of post-Apartheid cinema" (chapter 12). Though Botha's latest publication follows in the footsteps of earlier books such as Keyan Tomaselli's The Cinema of Apartheid (1989, Routledge) and Encountering Modernity: Twentieth Century South African Cinema (2006, Rozenberg Publishers) and Jacqueline Maingard's South African National Cinema (2007, Routledge), it differs substantially from the approaches followed by Tomaselli and Maingard. Similarly to Maingard, Botha discusses the different time periods of South African cinema within separate chapters. However, he is more descriptive and less prescriptive than Maingard, giving readers the opportunity to make up their own minds about aspects of it. Yet, I would propose that an instructor or professor of film history or African studies use these latter two sources in tandem, because while I found Botha's chapter "B Scheme Films" somewhat short and disappointing, in a university or college curriculum one could easily combine it with readings from sections of Maingard's chapters that deal comprehensively with the subject. Similarly, Botha's first chapter, "Early South African Cinema: 1895–1948," should be combined with readings from Thelma Gutsche's authoritative The History and Social Significance of Motion Pictures in South Africa, 1895–1940 (1972, Howard Timmins) and the recently published Black and White Bioscope: Making Movies in Africa: 1899 to 1925, by Neil Parsons (2018, Intellect Books). I argue that therein lies one of the strengths of Botha's publication: he knows and understands the oeuvre and does not seek to redo or rewrite the work of those scholars who came before him. Instead he opts to focus on his field of speciality, namely auteur studies. No stranger to historical accounts of his native country's film industry, Botha has written and edited several books on the topic. This includes 1992's Images of South Africa: The Rise of the Alternative Film (with Adri van [End Page 256] Aswegen, Human Sciences Research Council of South Africa) and Movies, Moguls, Mavericks: South African Cinema, 1979–1991 (edited by Johan Blignaut and Botha, Showdata) as well as the 2007 anthology, Marginal Lives and Painful Pasts: South African Cinema After Apartheid (Genugtig!). Botha continued this preference of auteur studies with books devoted to Manie van Rensburg (with Hubert Dethier, 1997, Vubpress) and Jans Rautenbach (2006, Genugtig!). Since these books were published in Dutch and Afrikaans respectively, one can understand why he aimed to summarize some of the content from the latter two publications in this book's chapter 4 and 5. In his own words Botha writes in the introduction of South African Cinema 1896–2010 that with this publication he aimed to spotlight the oeuvres of significant directors that Maingard as well as Isabel Balseiro and Ntongela Masilela (To Change Reels: Film and Film Culture in South Africa; 2003, Wayne State University Press) ignored. Therefore, apart from his chapters on Rautenbach and Van Rensburg, he focuses on South African directors of the 1980s and honors Ross Devenish with a chapter discussing this director's oeuvre in terms of themes and aesthetics. South African Cinema 1896–2010's seemingly objective title (without a subtitle indicating a specific focus) suggests an attempt by Botha to steer away from clear slant in terms of paradigm or ideology and to give an unbiased (if one can divorce oneself from history), descriptive account of films produced both within South Africa and by South Africans in exile. Botha's approach reminds me of Robert Ross's A Concise History of South Africa (1999, Cambridge University Press), which provides a short history of the country for university readers and general interest readers. Precisely therein lies the distinguishing factor of Botha's recent publication: he synthesizes the history of the country's film industry in a...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.897
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlack CameraSame topicAfrican history and culture studiesFrench-language works237,207