An Academic Review on How Important the Socio -Economic Criteria of Countries in Granting Citizenship
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Naturalization rates among established immigrants throughout Europe remain low and vary greatly (OECD/EU 2018), even though citizenship regulations are a vital indication of a country's overall approach to the incorporation of immigrants (Huddleston and Vink 2015). The average for the European Union is 59%, which is lower than the norms for the United States (62%) and Australia (81%), as well as Canada (90%). When politicians and scholars attempt to explain variances in the naturalization process from one nation to another, they often allude to variations in citizenship legislation and the make-up of the immigrant population (Brubaker 1992; Joppke 2007; Goodman 2010). In debates on naturalization, the major focus is on the well-researched grounds and laws for citizenship. Frequently, an emphasis is placed on the legal requirements for naturalization via the usual procedure. In spite of this, there seems to be an "implementation gap" throughout Europe when one considers the citizenship laws, naturalization procedures, and the number of persons who have been naturalized. If the requirements, sensitivities, and standards that we have stated above are adhered to, citizenship based on money or investment may also be helpful. It is recommended that, as an alternative to outright turning down the application, the application be reviewed to determine how it should be managed. In recent times, some new regulations have been made in the provisions regarding the acquisition of citizenship by exceptional means in the Turkish Citizenship Law, which is the main regulation regarding the acquisition of Turkish citizenship, and the Regulation on the implementation of this Law. In addition, the regime regarding the acquisition of Turkish citizenship through exceptional means has undergone a fundamental change within the framework of these regulations. For more information, see the Turkish Citizenship Law and the Regulation on the implementation of this Law. [The Law Governing Citizenship in Turkey]. In this context, the nature and scope of the regulations regarding the exceptional acquisition of citizenship in Turkish law should be managed from the perspective of historical research. Additionally, the nature and scope of the regulations in other laws regarding the exceptional acquisition of citizenship should be investigated in detail. The pertinent regulation of Turkish Citizenship Law No. 5901, which contains the regulation addressing the acquisition of Turkish citizenship as an exception in Turkish law, is essential in terms of the scope both before to and after the modification made with Law No. 6735. This is because the relevant regulation includes the regulation regarding the acquisition of Turkish citizenship as an exception in Turkish law.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,012 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,007 | 0,010 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,012 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».