MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4366809204 · doi:10.1353/leg.2022.0006

Screen Secrets: The Unpublished Hollywood Novels of Winnifred Eaton

2022· article· en· W4366809204 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tom Allen

Notice bibliographique

RevueLegacy A Journal of American Women Writers · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
ThématiqueCinema and Media Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHollywoodMovie theaterNovellaLiteratureHistoryEntertainmentPopular cultureFilm industryFilm genreSubject (documents)ArtArt historyVisual arts

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Screen Secrets:The Unpublished Hollywood Novels of Winnifred Eaton Thomas Allen Winnifred Eaton's late novels "Movie Madness" and "Hollywood Melody" take up subject matter that might surprise readers who know this author primarily through the romances set in Japan which she wrote years earlier under the pen name Onoto Watanna. Composed during the period in the 1920s and early 1930s when Eaton worked as a writer and editor for Universal Pictures, Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, and Fox Films, these novels voice powerful criticisms of the exploitation of women in the film industry. In addition, their interest in questions of identity in relation to the culture of images and mass media epitomized by cinema places these novels near the beginning of a critical appraisal of twentieth-century modern culture that would continue in now-canonical works such as Nathanael West's novella The Day of the Locust (1939). However, unlike many better-known Hollywood novels, Eaton's fiction celebrates the creative and aesthetic value of popular entertainment, even while recounting the struggles of their women protagonists against the film industry's corrosive patriarchal culture. Perhaps because of their feminist themes, these novels were never published in full (although "Movie Madness" did appear as a shortened and altered serialization in a Hollywood fan magazine). Fortunately, several manuscripts representing different stages of Eaton's work on the two novels have been preserved at the University of Calgary Archives and Special Collections. These novels not only add to our understanding of Eaton's range as an author but also illuminate the beginnings of a fictional genre that would become central to our understanding of the role of cinema in twentieth-century modern mass culture. During her tumultuous five-year career in the film industry, Eaton moved between positions and employers relatively quickly. Letters and memoranda preserved in the Calgary archive reveal a string of disputes over credit for collaborative writing projects and complaints that she was paid less than her male [End Page 54] peers doing similar work. Eaton entered the industry in December 1924 in a position of authority when, thanks to connections she had made as a best-selling novelist, she was hired as the head of the Scenario Department at the New York offices of Universal Pictures.1 Her early novel A Japanese Nightingale (1900) had been adapted into a film of the same name starring Fannie Ward and released in 1918. She met Universal's legendary founder Carl Laemmle Sr. when she contributed title-card dialogue and story development for a 1921 Universal film called False Kisses (Birchall 135–36). 2 As biographer Diana Birchall recounts, Laemmle "was to become a mentor to Winnifred" (135). Film historian Vito Adriaensens points out that Eaton's role, not uncommon at the time, was to serve as a conduit between the studio and the fiction writers in her "large network of personal contacts" who produced usable source material for cinematic adaptation. Eaton joined a succession of literary writers who not only lent cultural prestige to the film companies that hired them but also helped those companies acquire new material for adaptation. She received a salary of $200 per week, and, as Birchall notes, she had "a staff, assistants, secretaries, and an important, prestigious title and position" (Birchall 155; Universal Pictures contract, 12 Dec. 1924).3 In 1925 her contract was extended an additional six months at a salary of $300 per week, and she moved to Universal's West Coast offices (Reeve, Universal Pictures contract, 22 Oct. 1925). In early December 1926, however, Eaton wrote a passionate letter of resignation to Laemmle. Although she assured him of her continued "love and respect," she complained that the credit for her work on the adaptation of Show Boat (released in 1929) had gone to a male writer who had done little work on the project, and that she was a victim of workplace gossip: "From the day I arrived I was a marked woman. Stories without the slightest basis in fact were circulated about me to the effect that I was impossible to get on with" (Reeve to Carl Laemmle Sr.). She informed Laemmle that she was taking a job offer from rival studio MGM...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,574
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,545

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,016
Tête enseignante GPT0,214
Écart entre enseignants0,197 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2022
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueLegacy A Journal of American Women WritersMême sujetCinema and Media StudiesTravaux en français237 207