MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4366809204 · doi:10.1353/leg.2022.0006

Screen Secrets: The Unpublished Hollywood Novels of Winnifred Eaton

2022· article· en· W4366809204 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tom Allen

Bibliographic record

VenueLegacy A Journal of American Women Writers · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicCinema and Media Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHollywoodMovie theaterNovellaLiteratureHistoryEntertainmentPopular cultureFilm industryFilm genreSubject (documents)ArtArt historyVisual arts

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Screen Secrets:The Unpublished Hollywood Novels of Winnifred Eaton Thomas Allen Winnifred Eaton's late novels "Movie Madness" and "Hollywood Melody" take up subject matter that might surprise readers who know this author primarily through the romances set in Japan which she wrote years earlier under the pen name Onoto Watanna. Composed during the period in the 1920s and early 1930s when Eaton worked as a writer and editor for Universal Pictures, Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, and Fox Films, these novels voice powerful criticisms of the exploitation of women in the film industry. In addition, their interest in questions of identity in relation to the culture of images and mass media epitomized by cinema places these novels near the beginning of a critical appraisal of twentieth-century modern culture that would continue in now-canonical works such as Nathanael West's novella The Day of the Locust (1939). However, unlike many better-known Hollywood novels, Eaton's fiction celebrates the creative and aesthetic value of popular entertainment, even while recounting the struggles of their women protagonists against the film industry's corrosive patriarchal culture. Perhaps because of their feminist themes, these novels were never published in full (although "Movie Madness" did appear as a shortened and altered serialization in a Hollywood fan magazine). Fortunately, several manuscripts representing different stages of Eaton's work on the two novels have been preserved at the University of Calgary Archives and Special Collections. These novels not only add to our understanding of Eaton's range as an author but also illuminate the beginnings of a fictional genre that would become central to our understanding of the role of cinema in twentieth-century modern mass culture. During her tumultuous five-year career in the film industry, Eaton moved between positions and employers relatively quickly. Letters and memoranda preserved in the Calgary archive reveal a string of disputes over credit for collaborative writing projects and complaints that she was paid less than her male [End Page 54] peers doing similar work. Eaton entered the industry in December 1924 in a position of authority when, thanks to connections she had made as a best-selling novelist, she was hired as the head of the Scenario Department at the New York offices of Universal Pictures.1 Her early novel A Japanese Nightingale (1900) had been adapted into a film of the same name starring Fannie Ward and released in 1918. She met Universal's legendary founder Carl Laemmle Sr. when she contributed title-card dialogue and story development for a 1921 Universal film called False Kisses (Birchall 135–36). 2 As biographer Diana Birchall recounts, Laemmle "was to become a mentor to Winnifred" (135). Film historian Vito Adriaensens points out that Eaton's role, not uncommon at the time, was to serve as a conduit between the studio and the fiction writers in her "large network of personal contacts" who produced usable source material for cinematic adaptation. Eaton joined a succession of literary writers who not only lent cultural prestige to the film companies that hired them but also helped those companies acquire new material for adaptation. She received a salary of $200 per week, and, as Birchall notes, she had "a staff, assistants, secretaries, and an important, prestigious title and position" (Birchall 155; Universal Pictures contract, 12 Dec. 1924).3 In 1925 her contract was extended an additional six months at a salary of $300 per week, and she moved to Universal's West Coast offices (Reeve, Universal Pictures contract, 22 Oct. 1925). In early December 1926, however, Eaton wrote a passionate letter of resignation to Laemmle. Although she assured him of her continued "love and respect," she complained that the credit for her work on the adaptation of Show Boat (released in 1929) had gone to a male writer who had done little work on the project, and that she was a victim of workplace gossip: "From the day I arrived I was a marked woman. Stories without the slightest basis in fact were circulated about me to the effect that I was impossible to get on with" (Reeve to Carl Laemmle Sr.). She informed Laemmle that she was taking a job offer from rival studio MGM...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.574
Threshold uncertainty score0.545

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLegacy A Journal of American Women WritersSame topicCinema and Media StudiesFrench-language works237,207