MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4366809264 · doi:10.1353/rss.2020.0011

A History of Brixton Prison

2020· article· en· W4366809264 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Sheila Turcon

Notice bibliographique

RevueRussell the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Identity and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPrisonROWEImprisonmentPower (physics)CriminologyHistoryLawSociologyPolitical scienceManagement

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviews  c:\users\ken\documents\rj\type\red\rj   red.docx -- : A HISTORY OF BRIXTON PRISON Sheila Turcon Bertrand Russell Research Centre Hamilton, on, Canada l8s 4l6 turcon@mcmaster.ca Christopher Impey. The House on the Hill:Brixton:London’s Oldest Prison. Foreword by Raphael Rowe. London: Tangerine P., . Pp. . £.. isbn: ----. mpey is a Senior Producer of the Intelligence Podcast under the auspices of The Economist and the Managing Editor of National Prison Radio. He has written a popular book on Brixton Prison to draw attention to the many issues of imprisonment. He wants to attract as many readers as possible. His chapters are short and snappy with intriguing titles like “The Oyster Eater” and “A Kiss byWaterloo Bridge”. Raphael Rowe, who was wrongly imprisoned in Brixton for twelve years for a crime he did not commit, introduces the book. Let out in July , he now serves as a bbc investigative journalist and the host of a Netflix series on prisons. The book is arranged chronologically in five sections covering the period  to . He takes the reader through the various lives of the prison. First it held men and was notorious for its introduction and use of the treadmill upon which prisoners toiled all day, creating power to grind wheat (Part ). Scheduled to close, it was saved by becoming a women’s prison in  and was actually run by a woman, Emma Martin. It changed again in , reopening as a men’s prison. It was now a public works prison holding men who were unfit for heavy labour. Instead they manufactured and repaired items like uniforms and mail bags. In  it was turned into a military prison for those with sentences two years and under (Part ). It was closed in  but then reopened in  as a remand prison; that is, one holding men awaiting trial. It had been rebuilt and expanded with new land acquired. In addition to those on remand, it also housed a few debtors, juveniles, and convicts (Part ). Impey does not stint on providing details of crowding as well as the wet and cold conditions prisoners had to endure. By  well-furnished private cells could be rented. Other inmates could be hired as cleaners and food could be sent in. An outside barber cost threepence. One letter could be written every day on prison letterhead (pp. –).The quota on letters is far higher than what Russell was allowed in . Russell’s first imprisonment is covered in the chapter “Spies and Paci- fists”. He shares this chapter with Anton Kuepferle who was a spy and committed suicide. Another spy was taken from Brixton to the Tower of London I  Reviews c:\users\ken\documents\rj\type\red\rj   red.docx -- : and executed three years before Russell arrived (p. ). Impey provides several Russell quotations about his time in Brixton. None of them are footnoted (this is not an academic book). His only Russell source is Ray Monk, but most of the quotations are from the Autobiography. Also, in Part  Impey writes that smoking was banned in , but before that it had been allowed in the cells. A  experiment had even allowed it in the exercise yard (p. ). This treatment of tobacco conflicts with the smoking-ban Russell faced in  and which Impey notes (p. ). Russell’s return in  is covered in the chapter “The Sixties”. Mick Jagger also features in this chapter. Again, Impey provides a few quotations from Russell.They are not from Monk, who barely mentions this imprisonment,1 nor are they from the Autobiography. Brixton remains a remand prison but the “threat of closure still looms” (p. ).Why Impey calls this a threat is not clear as he is working toward reducing the population in prisons (p. ). One of his aims in writing this book was to engender more empathy in the public at large towards the imprisoned. works cited Monk, Ray. Bertrand Russell: the Spirit of Solitude. London: Cape, . —. Bertrand Russell, –: the Ghost of Madness. London: Cape, . Russell, Bertrand. Auto. , . 1 Monk, Bertrand Russell, –, p. . ...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,135
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,452

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0030,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0050,003
Communication savante0,0070,005
Science ouverte0,0010,004
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,1350,035

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,045
Tête enseignante GPT0,267
Écart entre enseignants0,222 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2020
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueRussell the Journal of Bertrand Russell StudiesMême sujetCanadian Identity and HistoryTravaux en français237 207