Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reviews c:\users\ken\documents\rj\type\red\rj red.docx -- : A HISTORY OF BRIXTON PRISON Sheila Turcon Bertrand Russell Research Centre Hamilton, on, Canada l8s 4l6 turcon@mcmaster.ca Christopher Impey. The House on the Hill:Brixton:London’s Oldest Prison. Foreword by Raphael Rowe. London: Tangerine P., . Pp. . £.. isbn: ----. mpey is a Senior Producer of the Intelligence Podcast under the auspices of The Economist and the Managing Editor of National Prison Radio. He has written a popular book on Brixton Prison to draw attention to the many issues of imprisonment. He wants to attract as many readers as possible. His chapters are short and snappy with intriguing titles like “The Oyster Eater” and “A Kiss byWaterloo Bridge”. Raphael Rowe, who was wrongly imprisoned in Brixton for twelve years for a crime he did not commit, introduces the book. Let out in July , he now serves as a bbc investigative journalist and the host of a Netflix series on prisons. The book is arranged chronologically in five sections covering the period to . He takes the reader through the various lives of the prison. First it held men and was notorious for its introduction and use of the treadmill upon which prisoners toiled all day, creating power to grind wheat (Part ). Scheduled to close, it was saved by becoming a women’s prison in and was actually run by a woman, Emma Martin. It changed again in , reopening as a men’s prison. It was now a public works prison holding men who were unfit for heavy labour. Instead they manufactured and repaired items like uniforms and mail bags. In it was turned into a military prison for those with sentences two years and under (Part ). It was closed in but then reopened in as a remand prison; that is, one holding men awaiting trial. It had been rebuilt and expanded with new land acquired. In addition to those on remand, it also housed a few debtors, juveniles, and convicts (Part ). Impey does not stint on providing details of crowding as well as the wet and cold conditions prisoners had to endure. By well-furnished private cells could be rented. Other inmates could be hired as cleaners and food could be sent in. An outside barber cost threepence. One letter could be written every day on prison letterhead (pp. –).The quota on letters is far higher than what Russell was allowed in . Russell’s first imprisonment is covered in the chapter “Spies and Paci- fists”. He shares this chapter with Anton Kuepferle who was a spy and committed suicide. Another spy was taken from Brixton to the Tower of London I Reviews c:\users\ken\documents\rj\type\red\rj red.docx -- : and executed three years before Russell arrived (p. ). Impey provides several Russell quotations about his time in Brixton. None of them are footnoted (this is not an academic book). His only Russell source is Ray Monk, but most of the quotations are from the Autobiography. Also, in Part Impey writes that smoking was banned in , but before that it had been allowed in the cells. A experiment had even allowed it in the exercise yard (p. ). This treatment of tobacco conflicts with the smoking-ban Russell faced in and which Impey notes (p. ). Russell’s return in is covered in the chapter “The Sixties”. Mick Jagger also features in this chapter. Again, Impey provides a few quotations from Russell.They are not from Monk, who barely mentions this imprisonment,1 nor are they from the Autobiography. Brixton remains a remand prison but the “threat of closure still looms” (p. ).Why Impey calls this a threat is not clear as he is working toward reducing the population in prisons (p. ). One of his aims in writing this book was to engender more empathy in the public at large towards the imprisoned. works cited Monk, Ray. Bertrand Russell: the Spirit of Solitude. London: Cape, . —. Bertrand Russell, –: the Ghost of Madness. London: Cape, . Russell, Bertrand. Auto. , . 1 Monk, Bertrand Russell, –, p. . ...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.135 | 0.035 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".